ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01349322

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)Whole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost (Arm 1)2.095% Confidence Interval 1.4 to 2.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With In-breast Recurrence (Local Failure)Hypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost (Arm 2)1.995% Confidence Interval 1.3 to 2.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants AliveWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost95.795% Confidence Interval 94.4 to 96.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants AliveHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost95.195% Confidence Interval 93.8 to 96.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without DiseaseWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost90.295% Confidence Interval 88.5 to 92.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without DiseaseHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost88.595% Confidence Interval 86.7 to 90.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Distant DiseaseWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost91.595% Confidence Interval 89.9 to 93.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Alive Without Distant DiseaseHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost90.295% Confidence Interval 88.4 to 91.9percentage of participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 1427Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 1554Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 2379Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 2290Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 334Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 335Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 42Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 44Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential BoostGrade 50Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event Reported as Definitely, Probably, or Possibly Related to Protocol TreatmentHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent BoostGrade 50Participants
Change in Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) Cosmesis Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 YearsWhole Breast Irradiation + Sequential Boost (Arm 1)0.1695% Confidence Interval 0.08 to 0.24score on a scale
Change in Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS) Cosmesis Subscale Score From Baseline to 3 YearsHypofractionated Whole Breast Irradiation + Concurrent Boost (Arm 2)0.1895% Confidence Interval 0.11 to 0.25score on a scale

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01349322/results