ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01441102

Dextromethorphan for Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT01441102, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, National Eye Institute (NEI); results first posted 2015-06-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dextromethorphan for Diabetic Macular Edema. Trials, record NCT01441102. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01441102

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dextromethorphan for Diabetic Macular Edema
NCT number
NCT01441102
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
7 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Conditions
Diabetic Macular Edema
Interventions
Dextromethorphan hydrobromide
First posted
2011-09-27
Last updated
2020-07-28
Results first posted
2015-06-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 months
Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. The participant's eye that met the study eye eligibility criteria was selected as the study eye. For cases in which both eyes met the study eye eligibility criteria, the study eye was selected according to the "choice of study eye in cases of bilateral disease" selection criteria outlined in the eligibility criteria. The eye not chosen as the study eye is referred to as the "fellow eye."
SecondaryPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 Months
Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.
SecondaryPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 18 Months
Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.
SecondaryPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 24 Months
Retinal thickness was assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), a non-invasive imaging technique that uses long-wavelength light to capture micrometer-resolution cross-sectional images from biological tissue. Changes in OCT will be calculated using the ETDRS grid. Attention will be directed to changes in retinal thickness as measured by OCT in each of the 9 subfields of the grid.
SecondaryChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 Months
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
SecondaryChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 Months
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
SecondaryChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 18 Months
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
SecondaryChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 24 Months
Visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Acuity is measured as letters read on an ETDRS eye chart and the letters read equate to Snellen measurements. For example, if a participant reads between 84 and 88 letters, the equivalent Snellen measurement is 20/20.
SecondaryNumber of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 Months
Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).
SecondaryNumber of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 Months
Fluorescein angiography (FA) images were obtained via a standard digital imaging system (OIS, Sacramento, CA) at baseline and at Month 6, Month 12, Month 18, and Month 24. Three retinal specialists independently graded the area of late fluorescein leakage (at approximately 10 minutes) using a region-of-interest tool in an image analysis software package (NIH ImageJ, Bethesda, MD).

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 monthsTwo participants withdrew from the study prior to the 6-month visit.percentage change in retinal thicknessMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 Monthspercentage change in retinal thicknessMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 18 Monthspercentage change in retinal thicknessMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 24 Monthspercentage change in retinal thicknessMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 MonthsTwo participants withdrew from the study prior to the 6-month visit.ETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 MonthsETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 18 MonthsETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 24 MonthsETDRS lettersMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 6 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 6 MonthseyesNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 12 Months Compared to BaselineBaseline and 12 MonthseyesNUMBER

Results by group17

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide-7.89Standard Deviation 15.18percentage change in retinal thickness
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide6.54Standard Deviation 26.96percentage change in retinal thickness
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide-0.99Standard Deviation 19.11percentage change in retinal thickness
Percentage Change in Retinal Thickness in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide-7.44Standard Deviation 18.33percentage change in retinal thickness
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide0.60Standard Deviation 11.44ETDRS letters
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide1.50Standard Deviation 15.02ETDRS letters
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 18 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide4.00Standard Deviation 10.74ETDRS letters
Change in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye at 24 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide5.50Standard Deviation 12.58ETDRS letters
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 6 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide4eyes
Number of Study Eyes Demonstrating a Decrease in the Area of Late Leakage, as Measured by Fluorescein Angiography (FA), at 12 Months Compared to BaselineDextromethorphan Hydrobromide3eyes

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDextromethorphan Hydrobromide7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDextromethorphan Hydrobromide4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDextromethorphan Hydrobromide3

Adverse events33

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVitreous haemorrhageEye disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide272
otherMalaiseGeneral disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171
otherFatigueGeneral disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide373
otherNephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171
otherPhotophobiaEye disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide172
otherCoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide172
otherBlisterSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171
otherMyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disordersDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171
otherLacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171
otherTooth infectionInfections and infestationsDextromethorphan Hydrobromide171

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDextromethorphan Hydrobromide
Total, other adverse eventsDextromethorphan Hydrobromide67
Total, serious adverse eventsDextromethorphan Hydrobromide17

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
6521986BACKGROUNDPubMed
6623578BACKGROUNDPubMed
15078674BACKGROUNDPubMed
30584490RESULTPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01441102

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01441102/events?page=2