ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01515787

PROSPECT: Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Surgery

NCT01515787, Phase 2, Phase 3, Unknown, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology; results first posted 2024-02-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. PROSPECT: Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Surgery. Trials, record NCT01515787. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01515787

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
PROSPECT: Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Undergoing Surgery
NCT number
NCT01515787
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
1,194 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Conditions
Colorectal Cancer
Interventions
FOLFOX (chemotherapy), 5 FUCMT (chemoradiation), surgery, magnetic resonance imaging or endorectal ultrasound
First posted
2012-01-24
Last updated
2024-02-02
Results first posted
2024-02-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPelvic R0 Resection RateUp to 5 yearsNumber of Participants with Pelvic R0 Resection
PrimaryDFSUp to 5 years
Disease-free Survival (DFS): The distribution of DFS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. 5 year disease free rates by treatment group with confidence intervals based on Kaplan-Meier curves will be reported. Log-rank test will be used to compare DFS between two treatment groups. Hazard ratio with confidence interval will be estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. The Cox proportional hazard model will be used for multivariate analysis.
SecondaryPathologic Complete ResponseUp to 8 years
Pathologic Complete Response (pCR): The pCR rate is defined as number of patients who achieve pCR divided by total number of patients included in the analysis population (see definition in Section 16.3.3.1) in each group. Patients who didn't undergo surgery will be classified as non-pCR. Point estimate and confidence interval (according to approach of Duffy and Santner) will be calculated by treatment groups. Chi-square test will be used to compare the pCR rates between groups.
SecondaryOverall SurvivalUp to 5 years
Overall Survival (OS): OS is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to all causes. The distribution of OS by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Five year survival rates by treatment group with confidence intervals based on Kaplan-Meier curves will be reported. Logrank test will be used to compare OS between two treatment groups. Hazard ratio with confidence interval will be estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. The Cox proportional hazard model will be used for multivariate analysis.
SecondaryRates of Receiving Pre- or Post-operative 5FUCMTUp to 5 years
Rates of Receiving 5FUCMT: For selective group patients, the proportion of patients who received 1) pre-operative 5FUCMT, 2) post-operative 5FUCMT, 3) either pre or post-operative 5FUCMT, and confidence intervals (according to approach of Duffy and Santner) will be reported.
SecondaryLocal Recurrence (TLR):Up to 5 years
Time to Local Recurrence (TLR): The distribution of TLR by group will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. 5 year local recurrence free rates by treatment group with confidence intervals based on Kaplan-Meier curves will be reported. The comparison of the cumulative incidence of local recurrence between groups, treating distant recurrence and death as competing risks using the test of Gray (Annals of Statistics, 1988) will be conducted.
SecondaryNeoadjuvant Rectal ScoreUp to 5 years
neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score =\[5 \* pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12\]\^2/9.61. cT is an element of the set {1, 2, 3, 4}, pT is in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}, and pN is in {0, 1, 2}. cT clinical tumor stage, pT pathologic tumor stage, pN pathologic nodal stage. Low (NAR \<8), intermediate (NAR = 8-16), and high (NAR \>16). Low is better and high is worse.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPelvic R0 Resection RateUp to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYDFSUp to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPathologic Complete ResponseUp to 8 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYOverall SurvivalUp to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYRates of Receiving Pre- or Post-operative 5FUCMTUp to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYLocal Recurrence (TLR):Up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNeoadjuvant Rectal ScoreUp to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pelvic R0 Resection RateGroup 1529Participants
Pelvic R0 Resection RateGroup 2495Participants
DFSGroup 1114Participants
DFSGroup 2113Participants
Pathologic Complete ResponseGroup 1117Participants
Pathologic Complete ResponseGroup 2124Participants
Overall SurvivalGroup 174Participants
Overall SurvivalGroup 267Participants
Rates of Receiving Pre- or Post-operative 5FUCMTGroup 161Participants
Rates of Receiving Pre- or Post-operative 5FUCMTGroup 2543Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup 1597
Overall StudySTARTEDGroup 2597
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup 1585
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGroup 2543
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup 112
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGroup 254

Adverse events712

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 174585168
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 265543106
otherBlood and lymph sys disorders - Oth SpecBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 155859
otherBlood and lymph sys disorders - Oth SpecBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 235434
otherDisseminated intravascular coagulationBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 105850
otherDisseminated intravascular coagulationBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 215431
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 11258513
otherFebrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 215431
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 115851
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersGroup 215432

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup 174585
Total, all-cause mortalityGroup 267543
Total, other adverse eventsGroup 1582585
Total, other adverse eventsGroup 2534543
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup 110585
Total, serious adverse eventsGroup 27543

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30688523DERIVEDPubMed
37270691DERIVEDPubMed
37272534DERIVEDPubMed
38776515DERIVEDPubMed
41379261DERIVEDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
U10CA031946Cancer and Leukemia Group BBERTAGNOLLI, MONICA MBRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITALNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE1985 to 2013

Trial comparisons8

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Group 1 vs Group 2: Overall SurvivalTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: DFSTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: Pelvic R0 Resection RateTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: Local Recurrence (TLR):Trial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: Pathologic Complete ResponseTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: Rates of Receiving Pre- or Post-operative 5FUCMTTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Group 1 vs Group 2: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01515787

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01515787/events?page=2