ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01876212

Dendritic Cell Vaccines + Dasatinib for Metastatic Melanoma

NCT01876212, Phase 2, Completed, Walter J. Storkus; results first posted 2019-08-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Dendritic Cell Vaccines + Dasatinib for Metastatic Melanoma. Trials, record NCT01876212. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01876212

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Dendritic Cell Vaccines + Dasatinib for Metastatic Melanoma
NCT number
NCT01876212
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Walter J. Storkus
Conditions
Metastatic Melanoma
Interventions
DC vaccine, Dasatinib
First posted
2013-06-12
Last updated
2019-08-22
Results first posted
2019-08-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryImmune Response RateUp to 13 months
Immune Response is defined as improved peripheral blood CD8+ T cell responses against 3 or more peptide epitopes after active vaccination with Type I-polarized autologous dendritic cell (αDC1) vaccine incorporating 6 tumor blood vessel-associated antigen (TBVA)-derived peptides. The measure of Immune Response for this study is expressed as a proportion of responders: The number of HLA-A2+ melanoma patients with improved peripheral blood CD8+ T cell responses (responders) divided by the total number of evaluable patients.
SecondaryBest Clinical ResponseUp to 13 months
The number of treated patients by best clinical response achieved (tumor measurements via radiologic evaluation) using RECIST 1.1. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) with reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. Progressive Disease (PD):≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance ≥1 new lesion(s) is considered progression.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)Up to 13 months
The proportion of evaluable patients that achieved either partial or complete responses. Calculation: The number of patients who experienced a Partial Response (PR) + the number of patients who experienced a Complete Response (CR) / total number of response-evaluable patients. Per RECIST v1.1, Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
SecondaryWorst Grade of Any ToxicityUp to 2 yearsNumber of participants and severity grades for treatment-relatedness scores of possibly, probably, or definitely.
SecondaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 15 months
The length of time after study treatment that a patient lives with disease but the disease does not progress. Patients were followed for 1 year after removal from study treatment or until death, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST 1.1, Progressive Disease is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). The sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance ≥1 new lesion(s) is considered progression.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Up to 30 monthsThe length of time from the start of study treatment, that patients remain alive.
SecondaryT Cell-recruiting Chemokine CXCL10/IP-10At baseline (prior to treatment)
Circulating serum concentration (levels) of T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL10/IP-10 analyzed via ELISA assay. Higher levels of T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL10/IP-1 correlate with patients exhibiting objective clinical response immunotherapy.
SecondaryT Cell-recruiting Chemokine CXCL10/IP-10At between 5 and 7 weeks, post treatment
Circulating serum concentration (levels) of T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL10/IP-10 analyzed via ELISA assay. Higher levels of T cell-recruiting chemokine CXCL10/IP-1 correlate with patients exhibiting objective clinical response immunotherapy.
SecondaryTreg CD4FoxP3 Suppressor CellsAt baseline (prior to treatment)
Percentage of Treg CD4FoxP3 suppressor cells in patients' peripheral blood. The accumulation of Treg CD4FoxP3 suppressor cell populations correlates with tumor progression (disease progression) and negative prognosis.
SecondaryTreg CD4FoxP3 Suppressor CellsAt between 4 and 6 weeks, post treatment
Percentage of Treg CD4FoxP3 suppressor cells in patients' peripheral blood. The accumulation of Treg CD4FoxP3 suppressor cell populations correlates with tumor progression (disease progression) and negative prognosis.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYImmune Response RateUp to 13 monthsPatients that received at least one cycle of study treatment.proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYBest Clinical ResponseUp to 13 monthsPatients that received at least once cycle of study treatment who were evaluable for response using tumor measurements via radiologic evaluation.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR)Up to 13 monthsPatients that received at least once cycle of study treatment who were evaluable for response using tumor measurements via radiologic evaluation.proportion of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYWorst Grade of Any ToxicityUp to 2 yearsPatients that received at least one dose of study treatment who experienced a treatment-related toxicity .ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProgression-free Survival (PFS)Up to 15 monthsPatients that received at least once cycle of study treatment who were evaluable for response using tumor measurements via radiologic evaluation.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Up to 30 monthsAll patients enrolled in the study.monthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYT Cell-recruiting Chemokine CXCL10/IP-10At baseline (prior to treatment)Patients that received Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) or Vaccine + dasatinib (both agents beginning Cycle 1, D1) for which there was an analyzable PBMC sample.pg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYT Cell-recruiting Chemokine CXCL10/IP-10At between 5 and 7 weeks, post treatmentPatients that received Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) or Vaccine + dasatinib (both agents beginning Cycle 1, D1) for which there was an analyzable PBMC sample.pg/mLMEAN
SECONDARYTreg CD4FoxP3 Suppressor CellsAt baseline (prior to treatment)Patients that received Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) or Vaccine + dasatinib (both agents beginning Cycle 1, D1) for which there was an analyzable PBMC sample.percentage of cellsMEAN
SECONDARYTreg CD4FoxP3 Suppressor CellsAt between 4 and 6 weeks, post treatmentPatients that received Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) or Vaccine + dasatinib (both agents beginning Cycle 1, D1) for which there was an analyzable PBMC sample.percentage of cellsMEAN

Results by group46

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Immune Response RateVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)0.2995% Confidence Interval 0.04 to 0.71proportion of participants
Immune Response RateVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)0.6795% Confidence Interval 0.22 to 0.96proportion of participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)Partial Response0Participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)Partial Response4Participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)Progressed Disease4Participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)Progressed Disease2Participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)Stable Disease3Participants
Best Clinical ResponseVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)Stable Disease0Participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)095% Confidence Interval 0 to 0.4096proportion of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Vaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)0.666795% Confidence Interval 0.2228 to 0.9567proportion of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)9
Overall StudySTARTEDVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)0

Adverse events242

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)59
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)36
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)09
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)16
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)19
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)06
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)19
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)16
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)09
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)16

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)89
Total, all-cause mortalityVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)56
Total, other adverse eventsVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)89
Total, other adverse eventsVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)66
Total, serious adverse eventsVaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1)79
Total, serious adverse eventsVaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1)46

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34782430DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01CA169118Combinational Immunotherapy Targeting the Melanoma-Associated VasculatureSTORKUS, WALTER J.UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGHNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2012 to 2016

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) vs Vaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Vaccine (Cycle 1, Day 1) + Dasatinib (Cycle 2, D1) vs Vaccine + Dasatinib (Cycle 1, D1): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01876212

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01876212/results?page=2