ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT01902290

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo in Adults With Inadequately Controlled Asthma With High Bronchodilator Reversibility

NCT01902290, Phase 2, Terminated, Amgen; results first posted 2022-02-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo in Adults With Inadequately Controlled Asthma With High Bronchodilator Reversibility. Trials, record NCT01902290. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT01902290

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo in Adults With Inadequately Controlled Asthma With High Bronchodilator Reversibility
NCT number
NCT01902290
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
421 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Conditions
Asthma
Interventions
Placebo, Brodalumab
First posted
2013-07-18
Last updated
2022-09-21
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2012-003351-11
Results first posted
2022-02-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24Baseline and week 24
The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.
SecondaryAsthma Exacerbation RateBaseline to week 24
The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline and week 24
The ACQ is a validated instrument used in clinical research and practice to evaluate asthma control/impairment. The ACQ assesses disease control by evaluating 7 questions: night time awakenings, asthma symptoms upon wakening, activity limitation, shortness of breath, wheeze frequency, short-acting bronchodilator use, and FEV1. All seven items are scored on a 7-point scale, with 0 indicating good control and 6 indicating poor control; the total score is the mean of the seven items and ranges from 0 (totally-controlled) to 6 (extremely poorly controlled). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A change of 0.50 points is considered clinically meaningful and a total score of \< 1.0 indicates good asthma control.
SecondaryAsthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline to week 24
The asthma exacerbation event rate is defined as the number of events per subject-year during the 24 week treatment period. An asthma exacerbation was defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study; distinct asthma exacerbations were defined as events with start dates more than 10 days apart from each other.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)Baseline and week 24
The Asthma Symptom Diary (ASD) consists of 23 questions answered on a handheld device, including 10 asthma symptom-related items (5 answered in the morning and 5 in the evening). The morning diary comprises questions on 4 asthma-related symptoms (wheezing, shortness of breath, cough, chest tightness), rated on a 5-point severity scale from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms), and 1 question on nocturnal awakenings, rated from 0 (did not wake up) to 4 (unable to sleep due to asthma). The evening diary has questions on the same 4 asthma-related symptoms and 1 question on limitations of activities, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The ASD daily score is computed by averaging the responses to the 10 symptom-related items, and the mean 7-day ASD score is calculated by averaging the 7 daily scores, with the final score ranging from 0 (minimal symptoms) to 4 (very severe symptoms).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline and week 24
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist UseBaseline and week 24Participants were permitted allowed to use their inhaled rescue medication (SABA) as needed throughout the study and the use was captured in the daily electronic diary (eDiary).
SecondaryTime to First Asthma ExacerbationFrom first dose of study drug to week 24
An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study. Median time to first asthma exacerbation could not be estimated, the percentage of participants with an asthma exacerbation is reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma ExacerbationBaseline to week 24An asthma exacerbation is defined as an asthma worsening that requires systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days during the study.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall ScoreBaseline and week 24
The AQLQ is an asthma-specific instrument that includes evaluations of both symptoms and health-related quality of life measures. The 32-item instrument measures 4 domains affected by asthma including activity limitations, emotional function, exposure to environmental stimuli, and symptoms. Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (7=no impairment, 1=severe impairment). The overall score was calculated as mean of the responses to the 32 questions and ranges from 1 (severe impairment) to 7 (no impairment). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24Baseline and week 24Full analysis set with available datascore on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAsthma Exacerbation RateBaseline to week 24Full analysis set with available dataexacerbations per subject-yearNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline and week 24Full analysis set participants who were taking both inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) at baseline with available data.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYAsthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBaseline to week 24Full analysis set participants taking both ICS and LABA at baseline with available dataexacerbations per subject-yearNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)Baseline and week 24Full analysis set with available datascore on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline and week 24Full analysis set with available dataL/sLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Daily Rescue Short-acting Beta-agonist UseBaseline and week 24Full analysis set with available datapuffsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to First Asthma ExacerbationFrom first dose of study drug to week 24Full analysis set with available datapercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma ExacerbationBaseline to week 24Full analysis set with available dataParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Overall ScoreBaseline and week 24Full analysis set with available datascore on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group77

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24Placebo-0.815Standard Error 0.073score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Composite Score at Week 24Brodalumab 210 mg-0.865Standard Error 0.074score on a scale
Asthma Exacerbation RatePlacebo0.57exacerbations per subject-year
Asthma Exacerbation RateBrodalumab 210 mg0.81exacerbations per subject-year
Change From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA SubpopulationPlacebo-0.793Standard Error 0.084score on a scale
Change From Baseline in ACQ Composite Score at Week 24 in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBrodalumab 210 mg-0.831Standard Error 0.088score on a scale
Asthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA SubpopulationPlacebo0.60exacerbations per subject-year
Asthma Exacerbation Rate in ICS+LABA SubpopulationBrodalumab 210 mg0.89exacerbations per subject-year
Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)Placebo-0.397Standard Error 0.042score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Daily Asthma Symptom Score (7-day Average Score)Brodalumab 210 mg-0.443Standard Error 0.043score on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo210
Overall StudySTARTEDBrodalumab 210 mg211
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugPlacebo207
Overall StudyReceived Study DrugBrodalumab 210 mg208
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo162
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBrodalumab 210 mg158
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo48
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBrodalumab 210 mg53

Adverse events64

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo3207
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersBrodalumab 210 mg6208
otherFatigueGeneral disordersPlacebo5207
otherFatigueGeneral disordersBrodalumab 210 mg2208
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersPlacebo3207
otherInjection site erythemaGeneral disordersBrodalumab 210 mg6208
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo14207
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsBrodalumab 210 mg13208
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo1207
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsBrodalumab 210 mg8208

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo
Total, all-cause mortalityBrodalumab 210 mg
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo104207
Total, other adverse eventsBrodalumab 210 mg129208
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo8207
Total, serious adverse eventsBrodalumab 210 mg7208

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
30945020BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Brodalumab 210 mg vs Placebo: Number of Participants Who Experienced an Asthma ExacerbationTrial comparisons
Brodalumab 210 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01902290

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT01902290/results?page=2