Trial · NCT02110225
A Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Potential Efficacy of rhNGF in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)
NCT02110225, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A; results first posted 2019-07-11
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. A Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Potential Efficacy of rhNGF in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP). Trials, record NCT02110225. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02110225
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- A Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Potential Efficacy of rhNGF in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP)
- NCT number
- NCT02110225
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 1, Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 50 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
- Conditions
- Retinitis Pigmentosa
- Interventions
- rhNGF 60 µg/ml eye drops solution, rhNGF 180 µg/ml eye drops solution, Placebo
- First posted
- 2014-04-10
- Last updated
- 2024-04-18
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2013-003029-26
- Results first posted
- 2019-07-11
- Limitations and caveats
- LImitations and caveats non specified
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes16
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | up to 48 weeks | Twenty-seven patients of the Safety population experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, 11 patients in the rhNGF 60 μg/ml arm, 13 patients in the rhNGF 180 μg/ml arm and 3 patients in the vehicle arm. |
| Primary | Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 | A global ocular discomfort score was determined using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on which 0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort. Specific ocular symptoms to be assessed with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. For ocular tolerability analysis, mixed models for repeated measures were applied using various ocular tolerability parameters as response variable, treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Primary | Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (ETDRS Chart) | Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 | Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) was assessed for each eye at each visit using an ETDRS visual acuity chart at 4 meters. |
| Primary | Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) | Weeks 2,12 and 24 | Intraocular Pressure was measured using either Goldmann applanation tonometry or a handheld applanation tonometer (e.g. Tonopen) after the instillation of a topical anesthetic.IOP was assessed for each eye at day 0 and at week 2, 12 and 24 |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Normal or Abnormal Findings by Slit Lamp Examination | Day 0; Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 | Slit Lamp Examination (SLE) (Biomicroscopy) was performed before the instillation of any dilating or anesthetic eye drops or fluorescein agents. SLE was executed to assess eyelids, lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, lens, iris and anterior chamber. |
| Primary | External Ocular Examination | Day 0, Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 | External ocular examinations were done to assess, for each eye and at each visit, the motility of extraocular muscles, appearance and function of the eyelids. |
| Primary | Change in Ocular Tolerability - Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy was assessed for each eye evaluating the retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve head. |
| Primary | Presence of Anti-NGF Antibodies | At Day 0 and at week 24 | Anti-NGF antibodies tests were performed at screening and at the end of treatment |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity | Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a Mars chart and is expressed as a log contrast sensitivity (log CS) score given by the log CS value at the lowest contrast numeral just prior to two incorrectly identified numerals, minus a scoring correction. The higher is the number of characters properly read by the patient, the higher is the contrast sensitivity. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 | Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | The Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyzer is a tool for measuring the human visual field by providing information regarding the location of any disease processes or lesion(s) throughout the visual pathway. In particular, Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 was used to assess static perimetry by measuring 24 degrees temporally and 30 degrees nasally and tests 54 points. The Analyser projects a series of white light stimuli of varying intensities (brightness), throughout a uniformly illuminated bowl. The higher is the number of stimuli perceived by the patient, the better is the retina's ability to detect a stimulus at specific points within the visual field. |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 registered outcomesOutcomes16
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | up to 48 weeks | Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| PRIMARY | Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 | Safety population: patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | units on a scale | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (ETDRS Chart) | Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 | Safety population: patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | Letters read correctly | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) | Weeks 2,12 and 24 | Safety population: patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | mmHg | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Number of Participants With Normal or Abnormal Findings by Slit Lamp Examination | Day 0; Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 | s | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| PRIMARY | External Ocular Examination | Day 0, Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24 | Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| PRIMARY | Change in Ocular Tolerability - Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy | Day 0, Weeks 12, 24 and 48 | Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| PRIMARY | Presence of Anti-NGF Antibodies | At Day 0 and at week 24 | Safety population: all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. The safety population was used to analyze all safety endpoints (primary objective). | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity | Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | Intent to treat (ITT) population: all randomized patients. The ITT population was used for the exploratory analyses of ocular parameters. | score | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 | Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | Intent to treat (ITT) population: all randomized patients. The ITT population was used for the exploratory analyses of ocular parameters. | dB | MEAN |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 outcomesResults by group747
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 11 | Participants | ||
| Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 13 | Participants | ||
| Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events | Vehicle | 3 | Participants | ||
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | rhNGF 60µg/ml | Foreign body sensation - Left eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 5.45 | Standard Deviation 15.23 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | Foreign body sensation - Left eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 4.80 | Standard Deviation 21.31 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | Vehicle | Foreign body sensation - Left eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 3.50 | Standard Deviation 11.07 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | rhNGF 60µg/ml | Foreign body sensation - Right eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 5.75 | Standard Deviation 15.41 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | Foreign body sensation - Right eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 10.95 | Standard Deviation 24.44 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | Vehicle | Foreign body sensation - Right eye, Wk 1 vs Day 0 | 4.30 | Standard Deviation 14.31 | units on a scale |
| Change in Ocular Tolerability - VAS | rhNGF 60µg/ml | Foreign body sensation - Left eye, Wk 2 vs Day 0 | 3.50 | Standard Deviation 9.05 | units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 747Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 747 results by groupParticipant flow9
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 20 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 20 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Vehicle | 10 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 20 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 19 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Vehicle | 10 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 1 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Vehicle | 0 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events81
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Extrasystoles | Cardiac disorders | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| other | Extrasystoles | Cardiac disorders | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| other | Extrasystoles | Cardiac disorders | Vehicle | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| other | Abnormal sensation in eye | Eye disorders | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 1 | 20 | 1 |
| other | Abnormal sensation in eye | Eye disorders | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| other | Abnormal sensation in eye | Eye disorders | Vehicle | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| other | Blepharitis | Eye disorders | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 3 | 20 | 3 |
| other | Blepharitis | Eye disorders | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| other | Blepharitis | Eye disorders | Vehicle | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| other | Conjunctival hyperemia | Eye disorders | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 1 | 20 | 1 |
1 to 10 of 81Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 81 adverse eventsAdverse event totals9
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 0 | 20 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 0 | 20 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Vehicle | 0 | 10 |
| Total, other adverse events | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 11 | 20 |
| Total, other adverse events | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 13 | 20 |
| Total, other adverse events | Vehicle | 3 | 10 |
| Total, serious adverse events | rhNGF 60µg/ml | 1 | 20 |
| Total, serious adverse events | rhNGF 180 µg/ml | 0 | 20 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Vehicle | 0 | 10 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02110225
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02110225/results?page=2