ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02110225

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Eventsup to 48 weeks
Twenty-seven patients of the Safety population experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, 11 patients in the rhNGF 60 μg/ml arm, 13 patients in the rhNGF 180 μg/ml arm and 3 patients in the vehicle arm.
PrimaryChange in Ocular Tolerability - VASWeeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24
A global ocular discomfort score was determined using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on which 0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort. Specific ocular symptoms to be assessed with the VAS included: foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision, photophobia. For ocular tolerability analysis, mixed models for repeated measures were applied using various ocular tolerability parameters as response variable, treatment, visit and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects, and baseline value as covariate.
PrimaryChange in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) (ETDRS Chart)Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) was assessed for each eye at each visit using an ETDRS visual acuity chart at 4 meters.
PrimaryChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)Weeks 2,12 and 24
Intraocular Pressure was measured using either Goldmann applanation tonometry or a handheld applanation tonometer (e.g. Tonopen) after the instillation of a topical anesthetic.IOP was assessed for each eye at day 0 and at week 2, 12 and 24
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Normal or Abnormal Findings by Slit Lamp ExaminationDay 0; Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48
Slit Lamp Examination (SLE) (Biomicroscopy) was performed before the instillation of any dilating or anesthetic eye drops or fluorescein agents. SLE was executed to assess eyelids, lashes, conjunctiva, cornea, lens, iris and anterior chamber.
PrimaryExternal Ocular ExaminationDay 0, Weeks 1, 2, 6, 12, 24External ocular examinations were done to assess, for each eye and at each visit, the motility of extraocular muscles, appearance and function of the eyelids.
PrimaryChange in Ocular Tolerability - Dilated Fundus OphthalmoscopyDay 0, Weeks 12, 24 and 48Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy was assessed for each eye evaluating the retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve head.
PrimaryPresence of Anti-NGF AntibodiesAt Day 0 and at week 24Anti-NGF antibodies tests were performed at screening and at the end of treatment
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Contrast SensitivityWeeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a Mars chart and is expressed as a log contrast sensitivity (log CS) score given by the log CS value at the lowest contrast numeral just prior to two incorrectly identified numerals, minus a scoring correction. The higher is the number of characters properly read by the patient, the higher is the contrast sensitivity.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Humphrey Visual Field 24-2Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
The Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) analyzer is a tool for measuring the human visual field by providing information regarding the location of any disease processes or lesion(s) throughout the visual pathway. In particular, Humphrey Visual Field 24-2 was used to assess static perimetry by measuring 24 degrees temporally and 30 degrees nasally and tests 54 points. The Analyser projects a series of white light stimuli of varying intensities (brightness), throughout a uniformly illuminated bowl. The higher is the number of stimuli perceived by the patient, the better is the retina's ability to detect a stimulus at specific points within the visual field.
SecondaryChange in Goldmann Visual FieldWeeks 12, 24, 36 and 48The Goldmann field exam was performed to assess kinetic perimetry on all enrolled patients.
SecondaryFundus ImagingDay 0, Weeks 24 and 48A recordable fundus image (photo or other electronic format) showing the central 30 degrees was captured through a dilated pupil to document the appearance of the posterior pole.
SecondaryOcular Coherence Tomography (OCT)Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48Ocular coherence tomography was performed to evaluate the cross-sectional anatomy of the macula and to document areas of retinal atrophy.
SecondaryMicroperimetryDay 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48MP1 microperimetry was analyzed to provide a more accurate measurement of retinal sensitivity in the central visual field, even in patients with unstable or extrafoveal fixation.
SecondaryBinocular Estermann Visual FieldDay 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Binocular visual field with Estermann grid testing a stimulus array of 120 points spread over an area extending approximately ±75° horizontally, 35° superiorly and 55° inferiorly while the patient looked steadily at the fixation target.
SecondaryElectrorethinogram (ERG)Day 0, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48A full field and 30 Hz flicker ERG was performed according to international standards. Patients were treated with anesthetic and dilating drops prior to the ERG procedure.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02110225/registered