ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02130557

A Multicenter Phase 3, Open-Label Study of Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

NCT02130557, Phase 3, Completed, Pfizer; results first posted 2018-11-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Multicenter Phase 3, Open-Label Study of Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia. Trials, record NCT02130557. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02130557

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Multicenter Phase 3, Open-Label Study of Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
NCT number
NCT02130557
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
536 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, Breakpoint Cluster Region-Abelson Proto-oncogene (BCR-ABL) Positive
Interventions
Bosutinib, Imatinib
First posted
2014-05-05
Last updated
2021-05-18
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-005101-31
Results first posted
2018-11-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12Month 12
MMR was defined as a ratio of breakpoint cluster region to abelson (BCR-ABL/ABL) less than or equal to (\<=) 0.1 percent (%) on the international scale (IS) (greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts \[\>=3000 ABL required\]) by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The percentage of participants with MMR at Month 12 are reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18Up to Month 18
MMR was defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/ABL \<=0.1% on the international scale (\>=3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts \[\>=3000 ABL required\]) by quantitative RT-qPCR. The percentage of participants with MMR for up to Month 18 are reported.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48Month 48
The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of MMR until the date of the confirmed loss of MMR or censoring, objectively documented, for responders only. Confirmed loss of MMR was BCR-ABL/ABL IS ratio \>0.1% in association with a \>=5-fold increase in BCR-ABL/ABL IS ratio from the lowest value achieved up to that time-point confirmed by a second assessment at least 28 days later. Treatment discontinuation due to suboptimal response/treatment failure, progressive disease (PD) or death due to PD within 28 days of last dose were considered confirmed loss of MMR. PD was defined as disease progression to accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) CML.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12Up to Month 12
Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a bone marrow (BM) aspirate. CCyR was achieved when there was 0% Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or MMR if no BM was available. The percentage of participants with CCyR for up to Month 12 are reported.
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48Month 48
The Kaplan-Meier curve was generated based on the first date of CCyR until the date of the confirmed loss of CCyR or censoring, objectively documented, for responders only. Confirmed loss of CCyR was the presence of at least one Ph+ metaphase confirmed by a second assessment at least 28 days later. Treatment discontinuation due to suboptimal response/treatment failure, PD or death due to PD within 28 days of last dose were considered confirmed loss of CCyR. PD was defined as disease progression to AP or BP CML.
SecondaryCumulative Incidence of Event Free Survival (EFS) EventsUp to Month 60
EFS was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause, transformation to AP or BP at any time, confirmed loss of complete hematologic response (CHR), confirmed loss of CCyR or censoring. Loss of CHR was defined as a hematologic assessment of non-CHR (chronic phase, AP, or BP) confirmed by 2 assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Loss of CHR was defined as appearance of any of the following: WBC count that rises to \>20.0\*10\^9/L, platelet count rises to \>=600\*10\^9/L, appearance of palpable spleen or other extramedullary involvement proven by biopsy, appearance of 5% myelocytes in peripheral blood, appearance of blasts or promyelocytes in peripheral blood. Loss of CCyR was defined as at least 1 Ph+ metaphase from analysis of \<100 metaphases confirmed by follow up cytogenetic analysis after 1 month. Cumulative incidence of EFS was defined as percentage of participants with EFS event at Month 60 and was adjusted for competing risk of treatment discontinuation without event.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS) RateUp to Month 60
OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to the occurrence of death due to any cause or censoring. Kaplan-meier analysis was used for determination of OS. Percentage of participants who were alive were estimated in this outcome measure.
OtherSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
CCyR was based on the prevalence of Ph+ metaphases among cells in metaphase on a BM aspirate. CCyR was achieved when there was 0% Ph+ metaphases among cells in a BM sample when at least 20 metaphases from a BM sample were analyzed, or MMR if no BM was available. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had CCyR are presented in this outcome measure.
OtherSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Major Molecular Response (MMR) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
MMR was defined as a ratio of BCR-ABL/ABL \<=0.1% on the international scale (\>=3 log reduction from standardized baseline in ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL transcripts) by quantitative RT-qPCR. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had MMR are presented in this outcome measure.
OtherSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 1 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to maximum severity grading based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Trough plasma concentration of participants who had grade 1 or higher AE are presented in this outcome measure. Data of plasma concentration is reported separately for each preferred term of AE.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12Month 12
Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies greater than (\>) 0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18Up to Month 18
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48Month 48
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization and who achieved MMR (responders). Here, Overall number of Participants Analyzed (N) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12Up to Month 12
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48Month 48
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization and who achieved CCyR (responders). Here, N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCumulative Incidence of Event Free Survival (EFS) EventsUp to Month 60
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS) RateUp to Month 60
mITT population included all randomized participants with Ph+ CML harboring the b2a2 and/or b3a2 transcript and baseline BCR-ABL copies \>0 with study drug assignment designated according to initial randomization.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had sufficient plasma results available. Here, N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed (n) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Imatinib arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)MEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Major Molecular Response (MMR) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
PK population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had sufficient plasma results available. Here, N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Imatinib arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
ng/mLMEAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDSummary of Trough Plasma Concentration by Presence of Grade 1 or Higher Adverse Events (AEs) of BosutinibPre-dose on Days 28, 56 and 84
PK population included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of bosutinib and had sufficient plasma results available. Here, N signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and n signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Imatinib arm as pre-specified in the protocol.
ng/mLMEAN

Results by group71

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12Bosutinib47.295% Confidence Interval 40.9 to 53.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 12Imatinib36.995% Confidence Interval 30.8 to 43.0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18Bosutinib61.095% Confidence Interval 54.9 to 67.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) Up to Month 18Imatinib52.795% Confidence Interval 46.4 to 59.0percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48Bosutinib92.295% Confidence Interval 86.8 to 95.4percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Month 48Imatinib92.095% Confidence Interval 85.9 to 95.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12Bosutinib77.295% Confidence Interval 72.0 to 82.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) Up to Month 12Imatinib66.495% Confidence Interval 60.4 to 72.4percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48Bosutinib97.495% Confidence Interval 93.9 to 98.9percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Retaining Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) at Month 48Imatinib93.795% Confidence Interval 88.9 to 96.5percentage of participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBosutinib268
Overall StudySTARTEDImatinib268
Overall StudyTreatedBosutinib268
Overall StudyTreatedImatinib265
Overall StudymITT PopulationBosutinib246
Overall StudymITT PopulationImatinib241
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBosutinib232
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImatinib231
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBosutinib36
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImatinib37

Adverse events488

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBosutinib96268
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImatinib53265
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBosutinib59268
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImatinib59265
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBosutinib33268
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImatinib61265
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBosutinib18268
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImatinib34265
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersBosutinib15268
otherLymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersImatinib8265

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBosutinib14268
Total, all-cause mortalityImatinib14268
Total, other adverse eventsBosutinib264268
Total, other adverse eventsImatinib260265
Total, serious adverse eventsBosutinib98268
Total, serious adverse eventsImatinib68265

Papers5

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29091516DERIVEDPubMed
33851349DERIVEDPubMed
35235189DERIVEDPubMed
35643868DERIVEDPubMed
37553873DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Bosutinib vs Imatinib: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Study Drug DiscontinuationTrial comparisons
Bosutinib vs Imatinib: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesTrial comparisons
Bosutinib vs Imatinib: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Bosutinib vs Imatinib: Number of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesTrial comparisons
Bosutinib vs Imatinib: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02130557

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02130557/results?page=2