ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02278341

Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients on Stable Dialysis

NCT02278341, Phase 3, Completed, Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.; results first posted 2020-08-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients on Stable Dialysis. Trials, record NCT02278341. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02278341

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients on Stable Dialysis
NCT number
NCT02278341
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
838 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Conditions
Anemia, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
Interventions
Roxadustat, Epoetin alfa, Darbepoetin alfa, Iron
First posted
2014-10-30
Last updated
2024-11-27
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2013-001497-16
Results first posted
2020-08-26
Limitations and caveats
Overall 838 were randomized to receive treatment. Two participants randomized to the pooled ESA treatment group were excluded due to GCP violations and their data was excluded. Total of 836 were considered randomized.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes45

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline (BL) to the Average Hemoglobin (Hb) in Weeks 28-36 Without Rescue Therapy [EU (EMA)]Baseline and weeks 28 to 36
Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of four central laboratory Hb values; four latest Hb values prior or on the same date as the first study drug intake. For participants who did not have an available Hb value during the week 28-36 period, imputation rules were applied. For analyses without rescue therapy, participants who used rescue therapy after the initiation of rescue therapy were set to missing for 6 weeks from the start date of rescue therapy. If no Hb value was available, an imputation technique was used, with the mean of all available values from Day 1 to minimum (End of Efficacy Emergent Period) carried forward.
PrimaryChange From BL to the Average Hb in Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue Therapy [US (FDA)]Baseline and weeks 28 to 52
Baseline Hb was defined as the mean of four central laboratory Hb values: four latest Hb values prior or on the same date as first study drug intake. Change from baseline to the average Hb are observed values. Missing hemoglobin data was imputed for each treatment relying on non-missing data from all participants within each treatment group using the Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) imputation model with treatment, baseline hemoglobin, randomization stratification factors and the available non missing hemoglobin for each scheduled week.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hb Response During Weeks 28 to 36Weeks 28 to 36
Hb response during weeks 28-36, was defined as mean Hb from 10-12 g/dL without receiving rescue therapy in the 6 weeks prior to, or during, the evaluation period. The percentages and 95% CI were unadjusted, the exact method of Clopper-Pearson was used for 95% CI. The Efficacy Emergent Period was defined as the evaluation period from the Analysis date of first dose intake up to end of treatment (EOT) Visit or last non-missing Hb assessment (for participants who died during the treatment period).
SecondaryChange From BL in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to the Average LDL-C of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28Baseline LDL was defined as the LDL value on Day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used.
SecondaryMean Monthly Intravenous (IV) Iron UseDay 1 to week 36
Participants with no or missing medication records of IV Iron have their monthly IV Iron use set to 0 mg. For participants who took IV Iron, but without a dosing frequency, the average values were set to missing.
SecondaryChange From BL in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning (PF) Sub-score to the Average of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28
Baseline SF-36 PF was defined as the SF-36 PF value on Day 1.The SF-36 is a Quality of Life (QoL) instrument designed to assess generic health concepts relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The SF-36 contains 36 items that measure eight scales: (1) physical functioning (PF); (2) role limitations due to physical health problems (RP); (3) bodily pain (BP); (4) social functioning (SF); (5) general health perceptions (GH); (6) role limitations due to emotional problems (RE); (7) vitality, energy or fatigue (VT); and (8) mental health(MH). Each scale is transformed into 0-100 score, with higher scores indicating better health status. The SF-36 PF consists of 11 questions focused on health and ability to do usual activities, with higher scores indicating better health status.
SecondaryChange From BL in SF-36 Vitality (VT) Sub-score to the Average of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28
Baseline VT Subscore was defined as the VT value on Day 1. The SF-36 is a QoL instrument designed to assess generic health concepts relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The SF-36 vitality has four questions with score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better vitality status.
SecondaryChange From BL in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to the Average of Weeks 20 to 28Baseline and weeks 20 to 28
Baseline MAP was defined as the MAP value on Day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is derived as: MAP = (2/3)\*DBP + (1/3)\*SBP.
SecondaryTime to First Occurrence of an Increase in Blood PressureWeeks 1 to 36
Increase in Blood Pressure was defined as either: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) ≥ 170 mmHg and an increase from BL ≥ 20 mmHg, or as: Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) ≥ 100 mmHg and an increase from BL ≥ 15 mmHg. For participants who have experienced more than one event, only their first event following study treatment was used. Data reported was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimate for cumulative proportion and the 95% confidence interval was calculated with Greenwood's formula.
SecondaryChange From BL in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to the Average MAP Value of Weeks 20 to 28Baseline and weeks 20 to 28
Baseline MAP was defined as the MAP value on day 1. If this value was missing, the latest value prior to first study drug administration was used. Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is derived as: MAP = (2/3)\*DBP + (1/3)\*SBP.

Outcomes45

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline (BL) to the Average Hemoglobin (Hb) in Weeks 28-36 Without Rescue Therapy [EU (EMA)]Baseline and weeks 28 to 36
The analysis population was the Per Protocol Set (PPS) which consisted of all Full Analysis Set (FAS) participants who did not meet any of exclusion criteria from the PPS. The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-dose valid Hb assessment.
g/dLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From BL to the Average Hb in Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue Therapy [US (FDA)]Baseline and weeks 28 to 52The analysis population was the All Randomized, which consisted of participants who received at least one dose of study drug, and who had available data.g/dLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Hb Response During Weeks 28 to 36Weeks 28 to 36The analysis population was the PPS.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From BL in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to the Average LDL-C of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28The analysis population was the FAS, with participants who had available data.mmol/LLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Monthly Intravenous (IV) Iron UseDay 1 to week 36The analysis population was the FAS, with participants who had available data.mg per monthLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From BL in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey Physical Functioning (PF) Sub-score to the Average of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28The analysis population was the PPS, with participants who had available data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From BL in SF-36 Vitality (VT) Sub-score to the Average of Weeks 12 to 28Baseline and weeks 12 to 28The analysis population was the PPS, with participants who had available data.Units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From BL in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to the Average of Weeks 20 to 28Baseline and weeks 20 to 28The analysis population was the PPS, with participants who had available data.mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTime to First Occurrence of an Increase in Blood PressureWeeks 1 to 36The analysis population was the PPS, with participants who had available data.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From BL in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) to the Average MAP Value of Weeks 20 to 28Baseline and weeks 20 to 28The analysis population was the FAS, with participants who had available data.mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group386

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline (BL) to the Average Hemoglobin (Hb) in Weeks 28-36 Without Rescue Therapy [EU (EMA)]Roxadustat0.42895% Confidence Interval 0.350 to 0.506g/dL
Change From Baseline (BL) to the Average Hemoglobin (Hb) in Weeks 28-36 Without Rescue Therapy [EU (EMA)]ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)0.19395% Confidence Interval 0.117 to 0.268g/dL
Change From BL to the Average Hb in Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue Therapy [US (FDA)]Roxadustat0.36395% Confidence Interval 0.288 to 0.438g/dL
Change From BL to the Average Hb in Weeks 28 to 52 Regardless of Rescue Therapy [US (FDA)]ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)0.19295% Confidence Interval 0.121 to 0.262g/dL
Percentage of Participants With Hb Response During Weeks 28 to 36Roxadustat84.295% Confidence Interval 80.2 to 87.7Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Hb Response During Weeks 28 to 36ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)82.495% Confidence Interval 78.3 to 86.0Percentage of participants
Change From BL in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to the Average LDL-C of Weeks 12 to 28Roxadustat-0.45995% Confidence Interval -0.517 to -0.401mmol/L
Change From BL in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) to the Average LDL-C of Weeks 12 to 28ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)-0.08295% Confidence Interval -0.138 to -0.026mmol/L
Mean Monthly Intravenous (IV) Iron UseRoxadustat21.695% Confidence Interval 14.0 to 29.3mg per month
Mean Monthly Intravenous (IV) Iron UseESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)53.595% Confidence Interval 46.0 to 61.1mg per month

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRoxadustat415
Overall StudySTARTEDESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)421
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentRoxadustat414
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)420
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRoxadustat297
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)329
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRoxadustat118
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)92

Adverse events880

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHyperparathyroidism secondaryEndocrine disordersRoxadustat2141421
otherHyperparathyroidism secondaryEndocrine disordersESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)1642017
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersRoxadustat3341451
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)3242060
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRoxadustat2741429
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)842010
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsRoxadustat2941438
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)2742034
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsRoxadustat1441419
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)2142029

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRoxadustat78414
Total, all-cause mortalityESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)59420
Total, other adverse eventsRoxadustat210414
Total, other adverse eventsESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)209420
Total, serious adverse eventsRoxadustat210414
Total, serious adverse eventsESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent)189420

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
36005278DERIVEDPubMed
38363466DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Roxadustat vs ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Roxadustat vs ESA (Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02278341

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02278341/registered?page=2