ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02304367

Study of Burosumab (KRN23) in Adults With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia (TIO) or Epidermal Nevus Syndrome (ENS)

NCT02304367, Phase 2, Completed, Kyowa Kirin, Inc.; results first posted 2020-07-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Burosumab (KRN23) in Adults With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia (TIO) or Epidermal Nevus Syndrome (ENS). Trials, record NCT02304367. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02304367

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Burosumab (KRN23) in Adults With Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia (TIO) or Epidermal Nevus Syndrome (ENS)
NCT number
NCT02304367
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
17 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
Conditions
Tumor Induced Osteomalacia (TIO), Epidermal Nevus Syndrome (ENS)
Interventions
Burosumab
First posted
2014-12-01
Last updated
2024-05-06
Results first posted
2020-07-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes51

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the Mid-Point of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24Mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22 [there was no study visit at Week 18])
The percentage of participants achieving mean serum phosphorus levels above the lower limit of normal (LLN; 2.5 mg/dL \[0.81 mmol/L\]) at the mid-point of the dose interval (2 weeks after dosing), as averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22).
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid ThicknessBaseline, Week 48Histomorphometry of trans-iliac crest bone biopsies was assessed by a blinded, central reader. Osteoid thickness is the mean thickness of osteoid seams.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Surface/Bone Surface (OS/BS)Baseline, Week 48Histomorphometry of trans-iliac crest bone biopsies was assessed by a blinded, central reader. Osteoid surface/bone surface is expressed as the percentage of bone surface covered in osteoid.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV)Baseline, Week 48
Histomorphometry of trans-iliac crest bone biopsies was assessed by a blinded, central reader. Osteoid volume/bone volume is expressed as the percentage of a given volume of bone tissue that consists of unmineralized bone (osteoid).
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Mineralization Lag Time (MLt)Baseline, Week 48
Mineralization lag time is a dynamic modeling parameter representing the mean time interval between the formation of osteoid and its subsequent mineralization which can be measured using histomorphometry with double tetracycline labeling. Mlt was calculated by dividing the osteoid width by the mineralizing apposition rate (MAR; the average rate at which new bone mineral is being added on any actively forming surface). If Mlt could not be calculated directly due to low tetracycline uptake, Mlt was imputed according to the following: Mlt = O.Th/(MAR\*MS/OS), where O.Th = osteoid thickness, MAR is imputed as 0.3 μm/day, MS/OS=mineralizing surface/osteoid surface, each measured at the same visit.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the End of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24End of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24)
The percentage of participants achieving mean serum phosphorus levels above the lower limit of normal (2.5 mg/dL \[0.81 mmol/L\]) at the end of the dose interval (4 weeks post-dose, prior to the next dose), as averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and the mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22)
Mean change from Baseline to the mid-point of the dose interval (2 weeks after dosing) averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22).
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and the mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22)
Mean percent change from Baseline to the mid-point of the dose interval (2 weeks after dosing) averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Mean change from Baseline at the end of the dose interval (4 weeks post-dose, prior to the next dose) averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24).
SecondaryPercent Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Mean percent change from Baseline at the end of the dose interval (4 weeks post-dose, prior to the next dose) averaged across dose cycles between Baseline and Week 24 (i.e. the average of serum phosphorus levels at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24).

Outcomes51

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the Mid-Point of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24Mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22 [there was no study visit at Week 18])TIO analysis set: includes participants with TIO who received at least 1 dose of burosumab during the study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid ThicknessBaseline, Week 48TIO bone biopsy analysis setµmMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Surface/Bone Surface (OS/BS)Baseline, Week 48TIO biopsy analysis setpercentage of bone surfaceMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV)Baseline, Week 48TIO bone biopsy analysis setpercentage of bone volumeMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 48 in Mineralization Lag Time (MLt)Baseline, Week 48TIO biopsy analysis set for whom Mlt could be calculated or imputeddaysMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the End of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24End of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24)TIO analysis setpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and the mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22)TIO analysis setmg/dLMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and the mid-point of each dose interval from Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 2, 6, 10, 14 and 22)TIO analysis setpercent changeMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24TIO analysis setmg/dLMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24TIO analysis setpercent changeMEAN

Results by group301

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the Mid-Point of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab50.095% Confidence Interval 26.80 to 73.20percentage of participants
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid ThicknessBurosumab-5.1295% Confidence Interval -10.04 to -0.20µm
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Surface/Bone Surface (OS/BS)Burosumab-0.1895% Confidence Interval -13.86 to 13.50percentage of bone surface
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Osteoid Volume/Bone Volume (OV/BV)Burosumab-5.4795% Confidence Interval -11.87 to 0.93percentage of bone volume
Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Mineralization Lag Time (MLt)Burosumab-565.2095% Confidence Interval -2037.42 to 907.02days
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above 2.5 mg/dL at the End of the Dose Intervals Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab21.495% Confidence Interval 7.57 to 47.59percentage of participants
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab1.039Standard Deviation 0.5622mg/dL
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab69.77Standard Deviation 43.743percent change
Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab0.550Standard Deviation 0.4260mg/dL
Percent Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphorus Levels at the End of the Dosing Cycle, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24Burosumab38.56Standard Deviation 33.027percent change

Participant flow5

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBurosumab17
Overall StudyCompleted 48 Weeks of Study DrugBurosumab16
Overall StudyCompleted 144 Weeks of Study DrugBurosumab12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBurosumab9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBurosumab8

Adverse events528

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 TIO214
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 XLH and ENS13
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 TIO114
otherCoagulopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 XLH and ENS03
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 TIO114
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersKRN23 XLH and ENS03
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersKRN23 TIO114
otherBradycardiaCardiac disordersKRN23 XLH and ENS03
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersKRN23 TIO114
otherTachycardiaCardiac disordersKRN23 XLH and ENS03

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityKRN23 TIO214
Total, all-cause mortalityKRN23 XLH and ENS03
Total, other adverse eventsKRN23 TIO1414
Total, other adverse eventsKRN23 XLH and ENS33
Total, serious adverse eventsKRN23 TIO814
Total, serious adverse eventsKRN23 XLH and ENS03

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34660853DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
KRN23 TIO vs KRN23 XLH and ENS: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
KRN23 TIO vs KRN23 XLH and ENS: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02304367

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02304367/registered?page=2