ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02822573

Phase 3 Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil

NCT02822573, Phase 3, Completed, Wake Forest University Health Sciences; results first posted 2023-09-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase 3 Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil. Trials, record NCT02822573. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02822573

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase 3 Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial of Donepezil
NCT number
NCT02822573
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
276 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Conditions
Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory Impairment
Interventions
Donepezil 5 mg, Placebo
First posted
2016-07-04
Last updated
2023-09-13
Results first posted
2023-09-13
Limitations and caveats
Our mainly non-Hispanic, white sample of breast cancer survivors, while geographically diverse, is not representative of all survivors. A lack of validated alternate forms of most of our tests may have contributed to a practice effect. We did not collect estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryHopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R): The HVLT-R measures verbal learning and memory. It consists of a 12-item word list which is read to patients on three successive learning trials. Free recall scores are recorded for each learning trial. After a 20-minute interval during which patients complete other non-interfering tasks and questionnaires they are asked to recall the target words. Range is 0-36 with higher values representing better verbal learning and memory.
SecondaryDigit Symbol Coding ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
The digit symbol coding (DSC) test measures processing speed, working memory, visuospatial processing, and attention. The DSC test measures processing speed. It requires respondents to transcribe symbols (e.g., \>) associated with a number (0-9) into empty boxes beneath a series of randomly ordered numbers. Total score is number of correctly transcribed symbols in 2 minutes. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher cognitive function.
SecondaryPROMIS 7-item Fatigue Scale Converted to T-scale ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36This self-report scale assesses fatigue. Scale ranges from 7 to 35 converted to T-scale ranging 29.4 to 83.2 Higher scores representing more fatigue.
SecondaryFACT-Cognition (Version 3): Perceived Cognitive ImpairmentBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
The FACT-Cog is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that includes subscales to measure Perceived Cognitive Impairment (PCI, n = 20 items, score range 0-80). Higher FACT-Cog PCI scores are better and indicate less cognitive impairment.
SecondaryControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA) ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
The Controlled Oral Word Association Test from the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery is a verbal fluency test in which participants are asked to say as many words as possible from a given category and in a specified timeframe (typically 60 seconds). Scores are the sum of all acceptable words. Minimum is 0 with no specified maximum; higher values represent better verbal fluency.
SecondaryTrail Making Test, Parts A & B (TMT-A, TMT-B) ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
TMT Part A consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper with the numbers 1 to 25 written randomly in each. For Part A, the person is tasked with drawing a line from one circle to the next in ascending numerical order, from 1 to 25, as quickly as possible. The lines between the circles are referred to as the "trail." Range 1-300 in seconds. Lower values indicate completing task faster with less difficulty. It is a measure of executive functioning with lower values being better. TMT Part B also consists of 25 circles on a piece of paper, But, rather than all of the circles containing numbers, they contain numbers (1 to 12) and letters (A through L). For Part B, the person is tasked with connecting the circles in ascending order, alternating back and forth from numbers to letters. In other words, the "trail" would be connected like this:1-A-2-B-3-C-4-D-5-E-6-F-7-G-8-H-9-I-10-J-11-K-12-L-13. The range 1-300 seconds. Higher values indicate worse executive functioning.
SecondaryDigit Span Test-Backwards (DST-B)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36
The Digit Span Task (Backwards-Only Version) measures working memory. On each question the participant repeats the numbers in reverse order of that presented aloud by the examiner (e.g., If the examiner says "5-6", the correct response would be "6-5"; If the examiner says "5-1-7-4-2-3-8", the correct response would be "8-3-2-4-7-1-5"). Score is 0 to 16 with higher scores representing better working memory.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYHopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analysis. Considered and utilized all data available at each timepoint.score on a scale of 0-36LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDigit Symbol Coding ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analysis. All available data from all participants utilized in models.score on a scale 0-100LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPROMIS 7-item Fatigue Scale Converted to T-scale ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat: all participants and timepoints available were utilized.T-scoreLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYFACT-Cognition (Version 3): Perceived Cognitive ImpairmentBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analyses: all available timepoints and participant data utilized.score on a scale 0-80LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYControlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA) ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analysis. All available timepoints from all participants utilized.score on a scale 0 to no specified maximLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYTrail Making Test, Parts A & B (TMT-A, TMT-B) ResultsBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analysis. All available participants and time points utilized.time (seconds)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDigit Span Test-Backwards (DST-B)Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36Intent to treat analyses: all timepoints and participant data used.score on a scale 0-16LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group48

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalDonepezil12 Weeks24.495% Confidence Interval 23.6 to 25.1score on a scale of 0-36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalPlacebo12 Weeks24.595% Confidence Interval 23.7 to 25.3score on a scale of 0-36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalDonepezil24 Weeks26.095% Confidence Interval 25.2 to 26.8score on a scale of 0-36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalPlacebo24 Weeks26.595% Confidence Interval 25.8 to 27.2score on a scale of 0-36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalDonepezil36 Weeks25.195% Confidence Interval 24.3 to 25.9score on a scale of 0-36
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) - TotalPlacebo36 Weeks25.995% Confidence Interval 25.1 to 26.7score on a scale of 0-36
Digit Symbol Coding ResultsDonepezil12 Weeks69.695% Confidence Interval 67.1 to 72.1score on a scale 0-100
Digit Symbol Coding ResultsPlacebo12 Weeks67.795% Confidence Interval 65.2 to 70.2score on a scale 0-100
Digit Symbol Coding ResultsDonepezil24 Weeks71.995% Confidence Interval 69.4 to 74.5score on a scale 0-100
Digit Symbol Coding ResultsPlacebo24 Weeks71.995% Confidence Interval 69.4 to 74.4score on a scale 0-100

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDDonepezil140
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo136
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDonepezil110
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo117
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDonepezil30
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo19

Adverse events22

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousInsomniaPsychiatric disordersDonepezil51405
seriousInsomniaPsychiatric disordersPlacebo31363
seriousHypertensionVascular disordersDonepezil21402
seriousHypertensionVascular disordersPlacebo41364
seriousHeadacheNervous system disordersDonepezil21402
seriousHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo21362
seriousApneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDonepezil01400
seriousApneaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersPlacebo11361
seriousDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersDonepezil11401
seriousDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo01360

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDonepezil0140
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0136
Total, other adverse eventsDonepezil0140
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo0136
Total, serious adverse eventsDonepezil12140
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo8136

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38709986DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
UG1CA189824Wake Forest NCORP Research BaseLESSER, GLENN J; DRESSLER, EMILY VAN METER; WEAVER, KATHRYN ELIZABETHWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2025

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Donepezil vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Donepezil vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests6

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Verbal LearningPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Symbol CodingSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test ASecondary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BSecondary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencySecondary outcomeConductCognition

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02822573

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02822573/results?page=2