Trial · NCT02919683
Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity
NCT02919683, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; results first posted 2020-07-31
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity. Trials, record NCT02919683. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02919683
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity
- NCT number
- NCT02919683
- Status
- Active not recruiting
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 30 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
- Conditions
- Head and Neck Cancer
- Interventions
- Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Standard of Care Surgery
- First posted
- 2016-09-29
- Last updated
- 2026-01-28
- Results first posted
- 2020-07-31
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes6
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to Treatment | At time of surgery | Response rate to window treatment with single agent nivolumab or nivolumab combined with ipilimumab is determined using bidirectional measurements (product of longest 2 diameters of lesions) of primary and nodal lesions to be removed at the time of surgery. Responders will have demonstrated any reduction in overall tumor volume as determined by the product of the longest perpendicular bidirectional tumor measurements. |
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | At the time of surgery | Outcome measure includes number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0, number of dose-limiting toxicities in safety run-ins following a 3 + 3 design, and delays to surgery. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST Criteria | At time of surgery | Determining the radiologic response rate following the window treatment as determined by RECIST v1.1. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Pathological Response | At time of surgery | Pathologic response in the primary tumor was assessed using a quantitative grading scheme: pathologic tumor response \[nonviable tumor\] PTR0 = no or \<10% response PTR1 = ≥10% PTR2 = ≥50% |
| Secondary | Participant One Year Progression-Free Survival Percentage | 1 year | Progression-free survival is defined as the time between first study treatment and either recurrent disease or death. Recurrent disease includes a local failure, regional failure, or distant metastasis. |
| Secondary | Participant Overall Survival Percentage | Data Cutoff (14.2 Months Median Follow Up) | Overall survival is defined as the time between first study treatment and death. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes6
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to Treatment | At time of surgery | Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| PRIMARY | Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | At the time of surgery | instances | NUMBER | |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST Criteria | At time of surgery | For this analysis, patients with no radiographically measurable lesions on imaging review were excluded. Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Pathological Response | At time of surgery | Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Participant One Year Progression-Free Survival Percentage | 1 year | Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Participant Overall Survival Percentage | Data Cutoff (14.2 Months Median Follow Up) | Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group16
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to Treatment | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 53 | 80% Confidence Interval 34.2 to 71.8 | percentage of participants | |
| Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to Treatment | Nivolumab | 50 | 80% Confidence Interval 30.5 to 69.5 | percentage of participants | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | Delays to Surgery | 0 | instances | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab | Delays to Surgery | 0 | instances | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | Dose-Limiting Toxic Effects during Safety Run-In | 0 | instances | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab | Dose-Limiting Toxic Effects during Safety Run-In | 0 | instances | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | Grade 3-4 Events At Least Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment | 5 | instances | |
| Safety and Tolerability of Protocol Treatment | Nivolumab | Grade 3-4 Events At Least Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment | 2 | instances | |
| Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST Criteria | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 38 | percentage of participants | ||
| Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST Criteria | Nivolumab | 13 | percentage of participants |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | STARTED | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 15 | |
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | STARTED | Nivolumab | 15 | |
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | COMPLETED | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 15 | |
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | COMPLETED | Nivolumab | 15 | |
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | NOT COMPLETED | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 0 | |
| Pre-Surgery Intervention | NOT COMPLETED | Nivolumab | 0 | |
| Post-Surgery Follow-Up | STARTED | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 15 | |
| Post-Surgery Follow-Up | STARTED | Nivolumab | 15 | |
| Post-Surgery Follow-Up | COMPLETED | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 12 | |
| Post-Surgery Follow-Up | COMPLETED | Nivolumab | 13 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events76
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 1 | 15 | |
| other | Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Nivolumab | 3 | 15 | |
| other | Oral pain | General disorders | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 3 | 15 | |
| other | Oral pain | General disorders | Nivolumab | 5 | 15 | |
| other | Fatigue | General disorders | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 1 | 15 | |
| other | Fatigue | General disorders | Nivolumab | 4 | 15 | |
| other | Hyperthyroidism | Endocrine disorders | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 1 | 15 | |
| other | Hyperthyroidism | Endocrine disorders | Nivolumab | 2 | 15 | |
| other | Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 0 | 15 | |
| other | Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | Nivolumab | 2 | 15 |
1 to 10 of 76Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 76 adverse eventsAdverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 2 | 15 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Nivolumab | 2 | 15 |
| Total, other adverse events | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 12 | 15 |
| Total, other adverse events | Nivolumab | 11 | 15 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Nivolumab With Ipilimumab | 2 | 15 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Nivolumab | 3 | 15 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers2
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons2
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison | Source |
|---|---|
| Nivolumab With Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab: deaths from any cause | Trial comparisons |
| Nivolumab With Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab: serious adverse events | Trial comparisons |
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02919683
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02919683/events?page=2