ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02919683

Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity

NCT02919683, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; results first posted 2020-07-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity. Trials, record NCT02919683. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02919683

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Window Study of Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity
NCT number
NCT02919683
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
30 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Conditions
Head and Neck Cancer
Interventions
Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, Standard of Care Surgery
First posted
2016-09-29
Last updated
2026-01-28
Results first posted
2020-07-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to TreatmentAt time of surgery
Response rate to window treatment with single agent nivolumab or nivolumab combined with ipilimumab is determined using bidirectional measurements (product of longest 2 diameters of lesions) of primary and nodal lesions to be removed at the time of surgery. Responders will have demonstrated any reduction in overall tumor volume as determined by the product of the longest perpendicular bidirectional tumor measurements.
PrimarySafety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentAt the time of surgery
Outcome measure includes number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0, number of dose-limiting toxicities in safety run-ins following a 3 + 3 design, and delays to surgery.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST CriteriaAt time of surgeryDetermining the radiologic response rate following the window treatment as determined by RECIST v1.1.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Demonstrating Pathological ResponseAt time of surgeryPathologic response in the primary tumor was assessed using a quantitative grading scheme: pathologic tumor response \[nonviable tumor\] PTR0 = no or \<10% response PTR1 = ≥10% PTR2 = ≥50%
SecondaryParticipant One Year Progression-Free Survival Percentage1 year
Progression-free survival is defined as the time between first study treatment and either recurrent disease or death. Recurrent disease includes a local failure, regional failure, or distant metastasis.
SecondaryParticipant Overall Survival PercentageData Cutoff (14.2 Months Median Follow Up)Overall survival is defined as the time between first study treatment and death.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to TreatmentAt time of surgeryThirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYSafety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentAt the time of surgeryinstancesNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST CriteriaAt time of surgery
For this analysis, patients with no radiographically measurable lesions on imaging review were excluded. Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Demonstrating Pathological ResponseAt time of surgeryThirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParticipant One Year Progression-Free Survival Percentage1 yearThirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYParticipant Overall Survival PercentageData Cutoff (14.2 Months Median Follow Up)Thirty patients were treated from 2016 to 2019. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses as she was ineligible because of evidence of distant metastatic disease at baseline.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to TreatmentNivolumab With Ipilimumab5380% Confidence Interval 34.2 to 71.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a Volumetric Response Rate to TreatmentNivolumab5080% Confidence Interval 30.5 to 69.5percentage of participants
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumab With IpilimumabDelays to Surgery0instances
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumabDelays to Surgery0instances
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumab With IpilimumabDose-Limiting Toxic Effects during Safety Run-In0instances
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumabDose-Limiting Toxic Effects during Safety Run-In0instances
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumab With IpilimumabGrade 3-4 Events At Least Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment5instances
Safety and Tolerability of Protocol TreatmentNivolumabGrade 3-4 Events At Least Possibly Related to Protocol Treatment2instances
Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST CriteriaNivolumab With Ipilimumab38percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Demonstrating Objective Response Using RECIST CriteriaNivolumab13percentage of participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Pre-Surgery InterventionSTARTEDNivolumab With Ipilimumab15
Pre-Surgery InterventionSTARTEDNivolumab15
Pre-Surgery InterventionCOMPLETEDNivolumab With Ipilimumab15
Pre-Surgery InterventionCOMPLETEDNivolumab15
Pre-Surgery InterventionNOT COMPLETEDNivolumab With Ipilimumab0
Pre-Surgery InterventionNOT COMPLETEDNivolumab0
Post-Surgery Follow-UpSTARTEDNivolumab With Ipilimumab15
Post-Surgery Follow-UpSTARTEDNivolumab15
Post-Surgery Follow-UpCOMPLETEDNivolumab With Ipilimumab12
Post-Surgery Follow-UpCOMPLETEDNivolumab13

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersNivolumab With Ipilimumab115
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersNivolumab315
otherOral painGeneral disordersNivolumab With Ipilimumab315
otherOral painGeneral disordersNivolumab515
otherFatigueGeneral disordersNivolumab With Ipilimumab115
otherFatigueGeneral disordersNivolumab415
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersNivolumab With Ipilimumab115
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersNivolumab215
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersNivolumab With Ipilimumab015
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersNivolumab215

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNivolumab With Ipilimumab215
Total, all-cause mortalityNivolumab215
Total, other adverse eventsNivolumab With Ipilimumab1215
Total, other adverse eventsNivolumab1115
Total, serious adverse eventsNivolumab With Ipilimumab215
Total, serious adverse eventsNivolumab315

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32852531DERIVEDPubMed
35050348DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Nivolumab With Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Nivolumab With Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02919683

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02919683/events?page=2