ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03040999

Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) or Placebo With Chemoradiation in Participants With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-412/KEYNOTE-412)

NCT03040999, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2023-06-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) or Placebo With Chemoradiation in Participants With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-412/KEYNOTE-412). Trials, record NCT03040999. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03040999

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) or Placebo With Chemoradiation in Participants With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (MK-3475-412/KEYNOTE-412)
NCT number
NCT03040999
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
804 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Interventions
Pembrolizumab, Placebo, Cisplatin, Accelerated Fractionation (AFX) Radiotherapy, Standard Fractionation (SFX) Radiotherapy
First posted
2017-02-02
Last updated
2026-02-04
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-003934-25
Results first posted
2023-06-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryEvent-free Survival (EFS)Up to approximately 62 months
EFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first record of any of the following events: death due to any cause; progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) or biopsy as indicated for locoregional progression or recurrence or distant metastasis. As well as the first record of the following types of surgery: salvage surgery for persistent or residual disease at the primary tumor site requiring surgical removal when invasive cancer is present on final pathology; neck dissection or surgery (performed for clinical or radiological disease progression per RECIST 1.1) ≤ 20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present; or neck dissection or surgery \>20 weeks from end of CRT when invasive cancer is present. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curve in each treatment group.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 62 months
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival curve in each treatment group.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 88 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who experienced an AE is presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AEUp to approximately 15 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. An AE is any sign, symptom, disease, or worsening of preexisting condition temporally associated with study therapy and irrespective of causality to study therapy. The number of participants who discontinued study drug due to an AE is presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) ScoreBaseline and up to week 45
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. For Global Health Status (GHS) (Item 29), participants are asked "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" Individual items are scored on a 7-point (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Raw scores for each scale are standardized into a range of 0 to 100 by linear transformation, with a higher score indicating a better level of function and better overall GHS. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-C30 scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA) model with the patient reported outcomes (PRO) scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of human papilloma virus (HPV) status and overall cancer stage.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45
EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the swallowing scale (Items 35-38) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in swallowing was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45
EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the speech scale (Items 30-32) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in speech was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45
EORTC QLQ Head and Neck Questionnaire (H\&N35) measures QoL in head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients. It consists of 7 multi-item scales (pain in the mouth, problems with swallowing, senses, speech, social eating, social contact, and sexuality). Participant responses to the pain scale (Items 31-34) were scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at all to 4=Very much). Raw scores were standardized by linear transformation so that scores ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating more problems. Change from baseline in pain symptoms was measured. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point EORTC QLQ-H\&N35 is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients. Participant responded to 5 questions from the EORTC QLQ-C30 about their physical functioning scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better physical functioning. A change from baseline of 10 points on the 100-point scale is considered as clinically relevant. Analysis was based on a cLDA model with the PRO scores as the response variable with covariates for treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, and stratification factors of HPV status and overall cancer stage.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 62 monthsAll randomized participants based on the treatment group to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 88 monthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AEUp to approximately 15 monthsAll randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) ScoreBaseline and up to week 45Participants with at least one patient reported outcome (PRO) assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Speech ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Pain Symptom ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Functioning ScoreBaseline and up to Week 45Participants with at least one PRO assessment available for this specific endpoint and who had received at least 1 dose of study intervention.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYEvent-free Survival (EFS)Up to approximately 62 monthsAll randomized participants based on the treatment group to which they were randomized.MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Pembrolizumab + CRT + PembrolizumabNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMonths
Overall Survival (OS)Placebo + CRT + PlaceboNA95% Confidence Interval NA to NAMonths
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab398Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Placebo + CRT + Placebo397Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AEPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab163Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AEPlacebo + CRT + Placebo132Participants
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) ScorePembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab1.9395% Confidence Interval -0.12 to 3.99Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (Item 29) ScorePlacebo + CRT + Placebo6.1795% Confidence Interval 4.10 to 8.23Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing ScorePembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab-3.8695% Confidence Interval -6.57 to -1.15Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) Swallowing ScorePlacebo + CRT + Placebo-3.3595% Confidence Interval -6.08 to -0.62Scores on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab402
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo + CRT + Placebo402
Overall StudyTreatedPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab398
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo + CRT + Placebo398
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab233
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo + CRT + Placebo213
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab169
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo + CRT + Placebo189

Adverse events724

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab229398298
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + CRT + Placebo205398287
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab2839829
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + CRT + Placebo3339835
otherHypoacusisEar and labyrinth disordersPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab8039884
otherHypoacusisEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + CRT + Placebo4939851
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab7539883
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo + CRT + Placebo8839892
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab4039843
otherHyperthyroidismEndocrine disordersPlacebo + CRT + Placebo3339835

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab156402
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + CRT + Placebo178402
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab398398
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + CRT + Placebo396398
Total, serious adverse eventsPembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab245398
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo + CRT + Placebo197398

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32490686DERIVEDPubMed
38561010DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab vs Placebo + CRT + Placebo: Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AETrial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab vs Placebo + CRT + Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab vs Placebo + CRT + Placebo: Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
Pembrolizumab + CRT + Pembrolizumab vs Placebo + CRT + Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03040999

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03040999/events?page=2