ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03050918

Discharge Follow-up Phone Call Program

NCT03050918, Not applicable, Completed, Vanderbilt University Medical Center; results first posted 2019-07-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Discharge Follow-up Phone Call Program. Trials, record NCT03050918. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03050918

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Discharge Follow-up Phone Call Program
NCT number
NCT03050918
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
3,054 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Conditions
Discharge Follow-up Phone Calls
Interventions
Follow-up Phone Call
First posted
2017-02-13
Last updated
2019-07-29
Results first posted
2019-07-29
Limitations and caveats
A data lag due to limited national electronic health record informatics connectivity prevents us from tracking adverse events documented outside of our facility. Unmeasured outcomes should be equally distributed between the randomized groups.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With In-patient Re-admissions30 daysNumber of participants with in-patient re-admissions
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction: ExperienceWithin 60 days of Discharge
Measured as mean Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction scores. Higher scores indicate more patient satisfaction. Range is 0-9 with 9 being the most satisfied.
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the Facility (Top Box Rating)Within 60 days of Discharge
Measured as mean Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction scores. Number of patients that reported a score of 3. Range is 0-3 with 3 being highest satisfaction.
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction: Hospital Experience (Top Box Rating)Within 60 days of Discharge
Measured as mean Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction scores. Number of patients that rated the Hospital Experience as 9. Scale range is 0-9. Higher scores indicate more patient satisfaction.
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the FacilityWithin 60 days of DischargeMeasured as mean Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction scores. Scale range is 0-3. Higher scores indicate more patient satisfaction.
SecondaryVUMC Emergency Department (ED) Visits30 daysAll cause ED visits following discharge
SecondaryNumber of Patient Received Discharge Plan Implementation Assistance30 daysNeed for assistance in implementing discharge plan
SecondaryMortality30 daysAll cause mortality

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With In-patient Re-admissions30 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatient Satisfaction: ExperienceWithin 60 days of Discharge
Patient experience data were retrieved from the hospital quality and patient safety office at 60 days, but assessment was administered via a survey sent to patients at their home after hospital discharge. Scores are based on the number of surveys returned
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPatient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the Facility (Top Box Rating)Within 60 days of Discharge
Patient experience data were retrieved from the hospital quality and patient safety office at 60 days, but assessment was administered via a survey sent to patients at their home after hospital discharge. Scores are based on the number of surveys returned.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatient Satisfaction: Hospital Experience (Top Box Rating)Within 60 days of Discharge
Patient experience data were retrieved from the hospital quality and patient safety office at 60 days, but assessment was administered via a survey sent to patients at their home after hospital discharge. Scores are based on the number of surveys returned
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPatient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the FacilityWithin 60 days of Discharge
Patient experience data were retrieved from the hospital quality and patient safety office at 60 days, but assessment was administered via a survey sent to patients at their home after hospital discharge. Scores are based on the number of surveys returned
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYVUMC Emergency Department (ED) Visits30 daysED visitsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Patient Received Discharge Plan Implementation Assistance30 daysDischarge plan implementation assistance was offered as part of the intervention and not to the control group.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMortality30 daysThirty-day mortality data was retrieved from the EHR data repository after a 120-day lag to capture delayed reporting.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With In-patient Re-admissionsPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)228Participants
Number of Participants With In-patient Re-admissionsUsual Care Group (Control Arm)232Participants
Patient Satisfaction: ExperiencePhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)8.2Standard Deviation 1.8score on a scale
Patient Satisfaction: ExperienceUsual Care Group (Control Arm)8.3Standard Deviation 1.4score on a scale
Patient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the Facility (Top Box Rating)Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm)168Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the Facility (Top Box Rating)Usual Care Group (Control Arm)193Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Hospital Experience (Top Box Rating)Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm)155Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Hospital Experience (Top Box Rating)Usual Care Group (Control Arm)173Participants
Patient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the FacilityPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)2.7Standard Deviation .7score on a scale
Patient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the FacilityUsual Care Group (Control Arm)2.7Standard Deviation .6score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)1,534
Overall StudySTARTEDUsual Care Group (Control Arm)1,520
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)1,534
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDUsual Care Group (Control Arm)1,520
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDUsual Care Group (Control Arm)0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)681,534
Total, all-cause mortalityUsual Care Group (Control Arm)751,520
Total, other adverse eventsPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)01,534
Total, other adverse eventsUsual Care Group (Control Arm)01,520
Total, serious adverse eventsPhone Call Group (Intervention Arm)01,534
Total, serious adverse eventsUsual Care Group (Control Arm)01,520

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29444787DERIVEDPubMed
32732787DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): MortalityTrial comparisons
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): Patient Satisfaction: Hospital Experience (Top Box Rating)Trial comparisons
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): Patient Satisfaction: Likelihood to Recommend the Facility (Top Box Rating)Trial comparisons
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): Number of Participants With In-patient Re-admissionsTrial comparisons
Phone Call Group (Intervention Arm) vs Usual Care Group (Control Arm): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03050918

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03050918/registered