ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03075891

Oracea Soolantra Association in Participants With Severe Rosacea

NCT03075891, Phase 4, Completed, Galderma R&D; results first posted 2019-11-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Oracea Soolantra Association in Participants With Severe Rosacea. Trials, record NCT03075891. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03075891

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Oracea Soolantra Association in Participants With Severe Rosacea
NCT number
NCT03075891
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
273 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Galderma R&D
Conditions
Rosacea
Interventions
Ivermectin 1% cream, Doxycycline 40 mg MR (30 mg Immediate Release & 10 mg Delayed Release beads) capsules, Oral placebo capsules
First posted
2017-03-09
Last updated
2021-03-16
Results first posted
2019-11-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes25

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Percent change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count at week 12 was reported. Inflammatory lesions included facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea (that is \[i.e.\] papules and pustules) which were defined as follows: Papule - a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 centimeter (cm) in diameter; and Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin, which contains yellow white exudates. Papules and pustules were counted separately on each of the 5 facial regions (forehead, chin, nose, right cheek and left cheek). Notably, nodules (i.e. circumscribed, elevated, solid lesions more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth) were not included in the count of inflammatory lesions.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8
Percent change from baseline in inflammatory lesion count at Weeks 4 and 8 was reported. Inflammatory lesions included facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea (i.e. papules and pustules) which were defined as follows: Papule - a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 centimeter in diameter. Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin, which contains yellow white exudates. Papules and pustules were counted separately on each of the 5 facial regions (forehead, chin, nose, right cheek and left cheek). Notably, nodules (i.e. circumscribed, elevated, solid lesions more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth) were not included in the count of inflammatory lesions.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clear Inflammatory Lesions at Week 12Week 12
Percentage of participants with clear inflammatory lesions at week 12 was reported. Inflammatory lesions included facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea (i.e. papules and pustules) which were defined as follows: Papule - a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 cm in diameter. Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin, which contains yellow white exudates. Papules and pustules were counted separately on each of the 5 facial regions (forehead, chin, nose, right cheek and left cheek). Notably, nodules (i.e. circumscribed, elevated, solid lesions more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth) were not included in the count of inflammatory lesions.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Inflammatory Lesions at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of participants with 100% reduction in inflammatory lesions at Weeks 4, 8 and 12 was reported. Inflammatory lesions included facial inflammatory lesions of rosacea (i.e. papules and pustules) which were defined as follows: Papule - a small, solid elevation less than 1.0 centimeter in diameter. Pustule - a small, circumscribed elevation of the skin, which contains yellow white exudates. Papules and pustules were counted separately on each of the 5 facial regions (forehead, chin, nose, right cheek and left cheek). Notably, nodules (i.e. circumscribed, elevated, solid lesions more than 1.0 cm in diameter with palpable depth) were not included in the count of inflammatory lesions.
SecondaryClinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator assessed the participant's diffuse persistent facial erythema of rosacea by performing a static ("snap shot") evaluation of erythema severity at a social distance of approximately 50 centimeter (cm) using CEA scale, at each visit. CEA is a 5 point scale where 0 = clear (clear skin with no signs of erythema); 1 = almost clear (almost clear; slight redness); 2 = mild (mild erythema; definite redness); 3 = moderate (moderate erythema; marked redness); 4 = severe (severe erythema; fiery redness). A higher score than baseline indicates a worse outcome.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Each Clinician's Erythema Assessment Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator assessed the participant's diffuse persistent facial erythema of rosacea by performing a static ("snap shot") evaluation of erythema severity at a social distance of approximately 50 centimeter (cm) using CEA scale, at each visit. CEA is a 5 point scale where 0 = clear (clear skin with no signs of erythema); 1 = almost clear (almost clear; slight redness); 2 = mild (mild erythema; definite redness); 3 = moderate (moderate erythema; marked redness); 4 = severe (severe erythema; fiery redness). A higher score than baseline indicates a worse outcome.
SecondaryInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator assessed the participant's rosacea by performing a static ("snap shot") evaluation, at a social distance of approximately 50 cm, using the IGA score. IGA is a 5 point scale where, 0 = clear (no inflammatory lesions present, no erythema); 1 = almost clear (very small papules/pustules, very mild erythema present); 2 = mild (few small papules/pustules, mild erythema); 3 = moderate (severe small or large papules/pustules, moderate erythema); 4 = severe (numerous small and/or large papules/pustules, severe erythema).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Each Investigator's Global Assessment Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator assessed the participant's rosacea by performing a static ("snap shot") evaluation, at a social distance of approximately 50 cm, using the IGA score. IGA is a 5 point scale where, 0 = clear (no inflammatory lesions present, no erythema); 1 = almost clear (very small papules/pustules, very mild erythema present); 2 = mild (few small papules/pustules, mild erythema); 3 = moderate (severe small or large papules/pustules, moderate erythema); 4 = severe (numerous small and/or large papules/pustules, severe erythema).
SecondaryStinging/Burning Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator recorded the severity of the participant's facial stinging/burning sensation during the last 24 hours according to the stinging/burning scale. Stinging/burning scale is a 4 point scale where, 0 = none (No stinging/burning ); 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation, not really bothersome); 2 = moderate (definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome); 3 = severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).
SecondaryPercentage of Participants in Each Stinging/Burning Severity Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12
The evaluator recorded the severity of the participant's facial stinging/burning sensation during the last 24 hours according to the stinging/burning scale. Stinging/burning scale is a 4 point scale where, 0 = none (No stinging/burning ); 1 = mild (slight warm, tingling/stinging sensation, not really bothersome); 2 = moderate (definite warm, tingling/stinging sensation that is somewhat bothersome); 3 = severe (hot, tingling/stinging sensation that has caused definite discomfort).

Outcomes25

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clear Inflammatory Lesions at Week 12Week 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Inflammatory Lesions at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYClinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Clinician's Erythema Assessment Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInvestigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Total Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Investigator's Global Assessment Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values for inflammatory lesion count.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStinging/Burning Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants in Each Stinging/Burning Severity Score Category at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Weeks 4, 8 and 12ITT population consisted of the entire population enrolled and randomized. The LOCF method was used to impute missing values.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group262

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules-80.29Standard Deviation 21.65percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Week 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules-73.56Standard Deviation 30.52percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR CapsulesWeek 4-48.15Standard Deviation 26.71percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo CapsulesWeek 4-39.27Standard Deviation 27.93percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR CapsulesWeek 8-69.14Standard Deviation 24.10percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Lesion Count at Weeks 4 and 8Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo CapsulesWeek 8-61.44Standard Deviation 28.74percent change
Percentage of Participants With Clear Inflammatory Lesions at Week 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules17.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Clear Inflammatory Lesions at Week 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules7.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Inflammatory Lesions at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR CapsulesWeek 4: Yes1.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 100 Percent (%) Reduction in Inflammatory Lesions at Weeks 4, 8 and 12Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo CapsulesWeek 4: Yes0.0percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules135
Overall StudySTARTEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules138
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules126
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules125
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules9
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules13

Adverse events26

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules11351
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules61386
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules01350
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules21382
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules01350
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules31383
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules61356
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules1013810
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules01350
otherRhinitisInfections and infestationsIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules21382

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules0135
Total, all-cause mortalityIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules0138
Total, other adverse eventsIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules17135
Total, other adverse eventsIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules33138
Total, serious adverse eventsIvermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules1135
Total, serious adverse eventsIvermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules1138

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules vs Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Ivermectin 1% Cream + Doxycycline 40 mg MR Capsules vs Ivermectin 1% Cream + Oral Placebo Capsules: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03075891

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03075891/registered?page=2