ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03153111

A Study to Evaluate Whether Macitentan is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease

NCT03153111, Phase 2, Completed, Actelion; results first posted 2022-04-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate Whether Macitentan is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease. Trials, record NCT03153111. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03153111

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate Whether Macitentan is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease
NCT number
NCT03153111
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
143 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Actelion
Conditions
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Interventions
Macitentan, Placebo
First posted
2017-05-15
Last updated
2025-03-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-003653-15
Results first posted
2022-04-04
Limitations and caveats
Recruitment was stopped prematurely in December 2019 due to slow enrollment which resulted in an underpowered study and impacted the meaningful interpretation of the results.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercent of Baseline N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Assessed at Week 24Week 24
Percent of baseline NT-proBNP assessed at Week 24 was reported. Percent of baseline is calculated as the ratio of the Week 24 NT-proBNP value over baseline value, expressed in percentage. NT-proBNP is one of the best established cardiovascular response markers among all available surrogates in heart failure (HF).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Summary Score Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) ScoreBaseline to Week 24
The KCCQ is a validated health related quality of life measure for heart failure. The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Clinical summary score is one of the quality of life variable of interest derived from KCCQ. Clinical summary score is the mean of domains: physical limitations score (6 items) and total symptom score (2 items \[symptoms frequency and symptom burden\]). The score is calculated by summing domain responses and then transforming scores to a 0-100 unit scale with higher scores indicating better health status.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Accelerometer-assessed Proportion of Time Spent in Light to Vigourous Physical ActivityBaseline to Week 24
Physical activity is assessed by accelerometer as the proportion of time spent in light to vigorous physical activity based on a threshold of greater than (\>)100 activity counts per minute and expressed as change from baseline to Week 24.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksWeeks 16, 24, 36, 52Number of participants with WHF events were reported. A WHF event includes HF death, hospitalization for WHF or an urgent visit for WHF.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercent of Baseline N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Assessed at Week 24Week 24Full analysis set (FAS) included participants which were randomized to double-blind study treatment.percentage of baseline NT-proBNPGEOMETRIC_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Summary Score Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) ScoreBaseline to Week 24
FAS included participants which were randomized to double-blind study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this outcome measure (OM).
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Accelerometer-assessed Proportion of Time Spent in Light to Vigourous Physical ActivityBaseline to Week 24FAS included participants which were randomized to double-blind study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) specifies all participants who were evaluated for this OM.proportion of time spentMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksWeeks 16, 24, 36, 52FAS included participants which were randomized to double-blind study treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group14

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percent of Baseline N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Assessed at Week 24Macitentan108.39Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.65percentage of baseline NT-proBNP
Percent of Baseline N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Assessed at Week 24Placebo106.27Geometric Coefficient of Variation 0.55percentage of baseline NT-proBNP
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Summary Score Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) ScoreMacitentan-2.37Standard Deviation 16.12score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Summary Score Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) ScorePlacebo0.89Standard Deviation 17.72score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Accelerometer-assessed Proportion of Time Spent in Light to Vigourous Physical ActivityMacitentan-0.024Standard Deviation 0.084proportion of time spent
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Accelerometer-assessed Proportion of Time Spent in Light to Vigourous Physical ActivityPlacebo-0.005Standard Deviation 0.098proportion of time spent
Number of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksMacitentanWeek 1612Participants
Number of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksPlaceboWeek 165Participants
Number of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksMacitentanWeek 2414Participants
Number of Participants With Worsening of Heart Failure (WHF) Events Over 52 WeeksPlaceboWeek 246Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMacitentan71
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo71
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMacitentan60
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo62
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMacitentan11
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo9

Adverse events310

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMacitentan571
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo371
otherBlood Loss AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMacitentan271
otherBlood Loss AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo171
otherHypochromic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMacitentan271
otherHypochromic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo071
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMacitentan471
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo171
otherNormocytic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMacitentan271
otherNormocytic AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo171

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMacitentan271
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo571
Total, other adverse eventsMacitentan5771
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5471
Total, serious adverse eventsMacitentan2971
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo2371

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40066571DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Macitentan vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Macitentan vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03153111

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03153111/events?page=2