ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03168776

PIONEER III Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the BuMA Supreme™ Drug Coated Coronary Stent in Patients With Coronary Disease

NCT03168776, Not applicable, Completed, Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.; results first posted 2026-01-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. PIONEER III Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the BuMA Supreme™ Drug Coated Coronary Stent in Patients With Coronary Disease. Trials, record NCT03168776. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03168776

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
PIONEER III Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of the BuMA Supreme™ Drug Coated Coronary Stent in Patients With Coronary Disease
NCT number
NCT03168776
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
1,629 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sino Medical Sciences Technology Inc.
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
BuMA Supreme DES, Xience or Promus DES
First posted
2017-05-30
Last updated
2026-01-27
Results first posted
2026-01-27
Limitations and caveats
The trial did not include all comers, e.g. ST elevation MI, left main disease or chronic total occlusion lesions, therefore, limiting generalizability of results to all patients.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent Elements12 monthsTLF is defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Cardiac DeathAssessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 years
Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g., MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure-related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment, will be classified as cardiac death.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsAll-cause death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (reported as a composite)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction (MI)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsDefined according to the modified Third Universal Definition as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with acute myocardial ischemia.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Stent ThrombosisAssessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsDefinite or probable (ARC-defined), classified as early, late, or very late
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Bleeding Complications (BARC Definitions)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 years
Evaluated as components and as a composite of BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding, including: Type 3a: Over bleeding plus hemoglobin drop of 3 to \<5 g/dL\* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed); Any transfusion with over bleeding Type 3b: Overt bleeding plus hemoglobin drop ≥5 g/dL\* (provided hemoglobin drop is related to bleed); Cardiac tamponade; Bleeding requiring surgical intervention for control (excluding dental/nasal/skin/hemorrhoid); Bleeding requiring intravenous vasoactive agents Type 3c: Intracranial hemorrhage (does not include microbleeds or hemorrhagic transformation, does include intraspinal); Subcategories confirmed by autopsy or imaging or lumbar puncture; Intraocular bleed comprising vision Type 5: Fatal bleeding
SecondaryLesion SuccessPost-ProcedureDefined as attainment of \<30% residual stenosis, as measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) using any percutaneous method \[evaluated post-procedure\]
SecondaryDevice SuccessPost-ProcedureDefined as attainment of \<30% residual stenosis of the target lesion measured by QCA using the assigned device \[evaluated post-procedure\]
SecondaryProcedure SuccessPost procedure/Prior to Discharge, an average of 3 daysDefined as lesion success without the occurrence of in-hospital MACE \[evaluated in-hospital\]
SecondaryClinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 years
Any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion, which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself. A revascularization is considered clinically driven if angiography at follow-up shows a percent diameter stenosis ≥ 70% (by core lab quantitative coronary angiography assessment) OR percent diameter stenosis ≥ 50% (by core lab quantitative coronary angiography assessment) accompanied by one of the following:103 1. a positive history of recurrent angina pectoris, presumably related to the target vessel; 2. objective signs of ischemia at rest (ECG changes) or during exercise test (or equivalent) presumably related to the target vessel; 3. abnormal results of any invasive functional diagnostic test (e.g., Doppler flow velocity reserve, fractional flow reserve).

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent Elements12 monthspercentage of subjects with TLFNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Cardiac DeathAssessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsNumber of participants with Cardiac DeathParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Myocardial Infarction (MI)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Stent ThrombosisAssessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Bleeding Complications (BARC Definitions)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYLesion SuccessPost-ProcedureNumber of Lesions TreatedCOUNT_OF_UNITS
SECONDARYDevice SuccessPost-ProcedureTotal Number of DevicesCOUNT_OF_UNITS
SECONDARYProcedure SuccessPost procedure/Prior to Discharge, an average of 3 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYClinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)Assessed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and up to 5 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group74

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)TLF5.495% Confidence Interval 4.1 to 6.9percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)TLF5.195% Confidence Interval 3.4 to 7.3percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)Cardiac Death0.395% Confidence Interval 0.1 to 0.8percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)Cardiac Death0.895% Confidence Interval 0.2 to 1.9percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)Target vessel MI3.495% Confidence Interval 2.4 to 4.7percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)Target vessel MI4.295% Confidence Interval 2.6 to 6.2percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)Clinically Driven TLR2.395% Confidence Interval 1.5 to 3.4percentage of subjects with TLF
Percentage of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) and Constituent ElementsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)Clinically Driven TLR0.995% Confidence Interval 0.3 to 2.2percentage of subjects with TLF
Number of Participants With Cardiac DeathBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)30 Days2Participants
Number of Participants With Cardiac DeathDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)30 Days1Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System1,086
Overall StudySTARTEDXience or Promus Everolimus Stent System543
Overall StudyITT Analysis Population - Sufficient Data to Evaluate Primary EndpointBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System1,058
Overall StudyITT Analysis Population - Sufficient Data to Evaluate Primary EndpointXience or Promus Everolimus Stent System530
Overall StudyITT Completed 12-Month Clinical F/UBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System1,042
Overall StudyITT Completed 12-Month Clinical F/UXience or Promus Everolimus Stent System522
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System1,042
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDXience or Promus Everolimus Stent System522
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDXience or Promus Everolimus Stent System21

Adverse events2

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
seriousMACECardiac disordersBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)2101,086323
seriousMACECardiac disordersDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)113543323

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)791,086
Total, all-cause mortalityDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)41543
Total, other adverse eventsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)00
Total, other adverse eventsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)00
Total, serious adverse eventsBuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT)2101,086
Total, serious adverse eventsDurable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT)113543

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33820424DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
BuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT) vs Durable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT): Procedure SuccessTrial comparisons
BuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT) vs Durable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
BuMA Supreme Coronary Stent System (ITT) vs Durable Polymer EES (XIENCE or Promus DES) (ITT): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03168776

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03168776/results?page=2