ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03238235

Outcomes25

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle Biopsiesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
log[percentage of total fibrosis]LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and Soleusafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
log[percentage of fat in muscle]LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of fat in muscleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Cross-sectional Area (CSA), in cm2 of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
centimeters^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Contractile Area of Lower Limb Muscles (MRI)after 12 months of treatment
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
centimeters^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Biopsy Histology Parameters: CSA by Type (I or II Fibers), Total CSAAfter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
micrometers^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Following Histology Parameters: Fibers With Nuclear Centralizations (%), Total Number of Fibers (%), Regenerative Fibers (%).after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned.
percentage of fibersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameter MFA(%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of muscle fiber areaLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameters Adipose Tissue (%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of total tissueLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Other Histological Structuresafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of total tissueLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Motor Function Measurement (MFM, Expressed as Log Least Square Mean)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test (TFT): Time to Walk/Run 10 Metersafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
secLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test (TFT) Via Time to Climb 4 Standard Stepsafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set. Please consider the data are showed in Log Least Square Mean
secLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test Via Time to Rise From Floorafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
secLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Visit 11 in Distance Performed Via 6-minute Walk/Run Test (6MWT, Expressed as Log Least Square Mean)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
log [meters]LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients With < 10% Worsening in 6MWT After 12 Months of Treatment.after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Patients with missing data such that \<10% worsening cannot be determined are included in the analysis as having worsened
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYCount of Participant Who Lose Ambulation During the Study (From Baseline to Month 12)from baseline to the end of month 12
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPercentage of Patients Who Fell During the 6MWTafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Muscle Strength Evaluated by Knee Extension, Elbow Flexionafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
NewtonLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Changes From Baseline to Visit 11 in Quality of Life (QoL, Assessed by the 36-item Short Form Survey [SF36])after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
units on a scaleMEAN

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03238235/outcomes