ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03238235

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat in Ambulant Patients With Becker Muscular Dystrophy

NCT03238235, Phase 2, Completed, Italfarmaco; results first posted 2024-11-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat in Ambulant Patients With Becker Muscular Dystrophy. Trials, record NCT03238235. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03238235

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Givinostat in Ambulant Patients With Becker Muscular Dystrophy
NCT number
NCT03238235
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
51 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Italfarmaco
Conditions
Becker Muscular Dystrophy
Interventions
Givinostat, Placebo
First posted
2017-08-03
Last updated
2024-11-18
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2017-001629-41
Results first posted
2024-11-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes25

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle Biopsiesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
The primary efficacy assessment was the mean total fibrosis (%) on log scale assessed through histological examination of bicep muscle biopsies at two timepoints (At baseline and at Visit 11). More particularly, patients underwent two biopsies of muscle from the brachial biceps: the first before starting the study treatment (Visit 2, baseline), and the second at the end of treatment (Visit 11). For each patient, the percentage of total fibrosis was calculated as log of the least square mean of the available fields at each evaluation.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and Soleusafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Evaluation was performed comparing Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. Please note that Statistics data are expressed as log least square mean (IC 95%) for the vastus lateralis and as least square mean (IC 95%) back-transformed on the original scale for the soleus.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Evaluation was performed comparing Dixon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. The lower limb muscles assessed were: whole thigh, quadriceps, medial thigh, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvic girdle. Please note that statistics data are expressed as: Least Square Means (95% CI) for whole thigh, quadriceps, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvis girdle; while as Log Least Square Means (95% CI) for medial thigh.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Cross-sectional Area (CSA), in cm2 of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Evaluation was performed comparing Dixon MRI findings before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. Dixon technique has advantages in multiple applications for evaluation of musculoskeletal system diseases. It allows more robust fat suppression than do other sequences and can be used in combination with multiple different sequences (GRE and SE) and using different weightings (T1, T2, or proton density). The lower limb muscles assessed were: whole thigh, quadriceps, medial thigh, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvic girdle (data showed as least square mean)
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Contractile Area of Lower Limb Muscles (MRI)after 12 months of treatment
A summary of mean change in the contractile area of lower limb muscles comparing MRI findings before and after 12 months of treatment in the ITT set is reported. The lower limb muscles considered are the same as the outcome 3. Please note that statistic data are expressed as Least Square Means (95% CI) except for Hamstrings which is expressed as Log Least Square Means.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Biopsy Histology Parameters: CSA by Type (I or II Fibers), Total CSAAfter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
A summary of the mean change in cross-sectional area (CSA) by type after 12 months of treatment in the ITT set is reported. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as Log Least Square Means (95% CI) for CSA type I fibers, and as Least Square Means (95% CI) for CSA type II fibers and Total CSA.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Following Histology Parameters: Fibers With Nuclear Centralizations (%), Total Number of Fibers (%), Regenerative Fibers (%).after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Evaluation of histologic parameters such as Fiber with nuclear centralizations (%), Total number of fibers (%), and Regenerative fibers (%) were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean for Regenerative fibers (%), and total number of fibers (Slides I), while are expressed as least square mean for Fibers with nuclear centralizations (%) and total number of fibers (Slides II and III).
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameter MFA(%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Evaluation of histology parameters such as Muscle Fibers Area \[MFA\](%), were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. MFA fraction was determined from biopsies using the mean of available fields. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as least square mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameters Adipose Tissue (%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Evaluation of histology parameters such as Adipose tissue (%) were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Other Histological Structuresafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Evaluation of other histological structures like necrotic cells, vessels and any other nonconnective tissue present in the microscopic field were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. The value is shown as % compared to the arithmetic mean of the two positive control (i.e., healthy subjects) bands present in the same western blot. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean.

Outcomes25

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle Biopsiesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
log[percentage of total fibrosis]LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and Soleusafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
log[percentage of fat in muscle]LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of fat in muscleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Cross-sectional Area (CSA), in cm2 of Lower Limb Musclesafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
centimeters^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Contractile Area of Lower Limb Muscles (MRI)after 12 months of treatment
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
centimeters^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Biopsy Histology Parameters: CSA by Type (I or II Fibers), Total CSAAfter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
micrometers^2LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Following Histology Parameters: Fibers With Nuclear Centralizations (%), Total Number of Fibers (%), Regenerative Fibers (%).after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned.
percentage of fibersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameter MFA(%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of muscle fiber areaLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameters Adipose Tissue (%)after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of total tissueLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Other Histological Structuresafter 12 months of treatment (Visit 11)
Intent-To-Treat Analysis (ITT) Set: all patients assigned treatment by randomization who received at least one dose of study medication. According to the intent to treat principle, patients were analyzed according to the treatment assigned. Efficacy analyses were performed on the ITT set.
percentage of total tissueLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group132

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle BiopsiesGivinostat-0.01795% Confidence Interval -0.367 to 0.333log[percentage of total fibrosis]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle BiopsiesPlacebo-0.05495% Confidence Interval -0.507 to 0.399log[percentage of total fibrosis]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and SoleusGivinostatVastus Lateralis0.01795% Confidence Interval -0.053 to 0.086log[percentage of fat in muscle]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and SoleusPlaceboVastus Lateralis0.06495% Confidence Interval -0.019 to 0.147log[percentage of fat in muscle]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and SoleusGivinostatSoleus-4.28795% Confidence Interval -6.126 to -2.447log[percentage of fat in muscle]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and SoleusPlaceboSoleus-4.02195% Confidence Interval -6.404 to -1.637log[percentage of fat in muscle]
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb MusclesGivinostatWhole Thigh0.64295% Confidence Interval -0.328 to 1.611percentage of fat in muscle
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb MusclesPlaceboWhole Thigh1.99695% Confidence Interval 0.813 to 3.180percentage of fat in muscle
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb MusclesGivinostatQuadriceps0.61095% Confidence Interval -0.506 to 1.726percentage of fat in muscle
Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb MusclesPlaceboQuadriceps2.57295% Confidence Interval 1.227 to 3.918percentage of fat in muscle

Participant flow14

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDGivinostat34
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo17
Overall StudyPer ProtocolGivinostat25
Overall StudyPer ProtocolPlacebo14
Overall StudyITTGivinostat34
Overall StudyITTPlacebo17
Overall StudySafetyGivinostat34
Overall StudySafetyPlacebo17
Overall StudyPKGivinostat34
Overall StudyPKPlacebo17

Adverse events148

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLymphocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersGivinostat1341
otherLymphocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0170
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersGivinostat0340
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersPlacebo1171
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersGivinostat2342
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0170
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersGivinostat3343
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1171
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersGivinostat163416
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0170

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityGivinostat034
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo017
Total, other adverse eventsGivinostat3034
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo917
Total, serious adverse eventsGivinostat034
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo017

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons5

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Givinostat vs Placebo: Percentage of Patients Who Fell During the 6MWTTrial comparisons
Givinostat vs Placebo: Count of Participant Who Lose Ambulation During the Study (From Baseline to Month 12)Trial comparisons
Givinostat vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Givinostat vs Placebo: Percentage of Patients With < 10% Worsening in 6MWT After 12 Months of Treatment.Trial comparisons
Givinostat vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03238235

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03238235/registered?page=2