Trial · NCT03238235
Registered outcomes25
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 25
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Total Fibrosis (%) on Log Scale, Comparing the Histology of Muscle Biopsies | after 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11) | The primary efficacy assessment was the mean total fibrosis (%) on log scale assessed through histological examination of bicep muscle biopsies at two timepoints (At baseline and at Visit 11). More particularly, patients underwent two biopsies of muscle from the brachial biceps: the first before starting the study treatment (Visit 2, baseline), and the second at the end of treatment (Visit 11). For each patient, the percentage of total fibrosis was calculated as log of the least square mean of the available fields at each evaluation. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Vastus Lateralis and Soleus | after 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11) | Evaluation was performed comparing Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. Please note that Statistics data are expressed as log least square mean (IC 95%) for the vastus lateralis and as least square mean (IC 95%) back-transformed on the original scale for the soleus. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in the Percentage of Fat Fraction of Lower Limb Muscles | after 12 months of treatment (at Visit 11) | Evaluation was performed comparing Dixon Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. The lower limb muscles assessed were: whole thigh, quadriceps, medial thigh, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvic girdle. Please note that statistics data are expressed as: Least Square Means (95% CI) for whole thigh, quadriceps, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvis girdle; while as Log Least Square Means (95% CI) for medial thigh. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Cross-sectional Area (CSA), in cm2 of Lower Limb Muscles | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation was performed comparing Dixon MRI findings before and after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat versus placebo. Dixon technique has advantages in multiple applications for evaluation of musculoskeletal system diseases. It allows more robust fat suppression than do other sequences and can be used in combination with multiple different sequences (GRE and SE) and using different weightings (T1, T2, or proton density). The lower limb muscles assessed were: whole thigh, quadriceps, medial thigh, hamstrings, triceps surae and pelvic girdle (data showed as least square mean) |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Contractile Area of Lower Limb Muscles (MRI) | after 12 months of treatment | A summary of mean change in the contractile area of lower limb muscles comparing MRI findings before and after 12 months of treatment in the ITT set is reported. The lower limb muscles considered are the same as the outcome 3. Please note that statistic data are expressed as Least Square Means (95% CI) except for Hamstrings which is expressed as Log Least Square Means. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Biopsy Histology Parameters: CSA by Type (I or II Fibers), Total CSA | After 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | A summary of the mean change in cross-sectional area (CSA) by type after 12 months of treatment in the ITT set is reported. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as Log Least Square Means (95% CI) for CSA type I fibers, and as Least Square Means (95% CI) for CSA type II fibers and Total CSA. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Following Histology Parameters: Fibers With Nuclear Centralizations (%), Total Number of Fibers (%), Regenerative Fibers (%). | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation of histologic parameters such as Fiber with nuclear centralizations (%), Total number of fibers (%), and Regenerative fibers (%) were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean for Regenerative fibers (%), and total number of fibers (Slides I), while are expressed as least square mean for Fibers with nuclear centralizations (%) and total number of fibers (Slides II and III). |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameter MFA(%) | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation of histology parameters such as Muscle Fibers Area \[MFA\](%), were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. MFA fraction was determined from biopsies using the mean of available fields. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as least square mean. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Percentage for the Biopsy Histology Parameters Adipose Tissue (%) | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation of histology parameters such as Adipose tissue (%) were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Other Histological Structures | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation of other histological structures like necrotic cells, vessels and any other nonconnective tissue present in the microscopic field were performed comparing muscle biopsies after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat. The value is shown as % compared to the arithmetic mean of the two positive control (i.e., healthy subjects) bands present in the same western blot. Please note that descriptive statistic data are expressed as log least square mean. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Motor Function Measurement (MFM, Expressed as Log Least Square Mean) | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation were performed using the MFM32 scale, that is a tool designed for neuromuscular diseases and is applicable to all degrees of disease severity. It was validated in terms of reproducibility, construct validity, and concurrent validity. It consists of 32 items (tasks) classified into three dimensions: D1, standing and transfers; D2, axial and proximal motor capacity; and D3, distal motor capacity. Each item is scored on a four-point Likert scale. The generic grading is measured as follows: 0, cannot initiate the task or cannot maintain the starting position; 1, partially performs the task; 2, performs the task with compensatory movements (position maintained for an insufficient period of time, slowness, uncontrolled movements, etc.); and 3, performs the task fully and 'normally', the movement being controlled, mastered, directed, and performed at a constant speed. The overall total score ranging from 0 (severe functional impairment) to 100 (no functional impairment). |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test (TFT): Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | TFT is assessed through 3 different parameters one of which is time to walk/run 10 m. The test was performed with or without orthoses as the patient preferred. He/she was not asked to run, but rather to arrive at the finish line as soon as possible leaving him the choice on how to do so. The assessor walked alongside the patient for safety but couldn't help her/him in any way. The walk/run speed was calculated as 10/time in seconds taken to run/walk 10 m. The test was graded as follows: 1. Unable to walk independently. 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with full leg calipers (KAFOs) or with support of a person. 3. Highly adapted wide-based lordotic gait. Can't increase walking speed. 4. Moderately adapted gait. Can pick up speed but can't run. 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase, i.e., cannot achieve both feet off the ground. 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase). The higher the grade, the better the outcome. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test (TFT) Via Time to Climb 4 Standard Steps | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | TFT is assessed through 3 parameters, one of which is "time to climb 4 standard steps". The patient was asked to stand at the bottom of the stairs with his arms by his sides. At the "go" signal, he/she had to walk up the stairs as quickly and safely as possible (using handrails if needed) until reaching an erect position on the top stair. The stair climb speed was calculated as 4/time in seconds taken to climb the 4 standard stairs. Grading of the 4-step ascent was:1. Unable to climb 4 stairs.2. Climbs 4 stairs "marking time" (climbs one foot at a time with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails.3. Climbs 4 stairs "marking time" (idem as up), using one arm on one handrail.4. Climbs 4 stairs "marking time" (idem as up), not needing handrail.5. Climbs 4 stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support.6. Climbs 4 stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support.The higher the grade, the better the outcome. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Time Function Test Via Time to Rise From Floor | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Time function test (TFT) is assessed through 3 different parameters, one of which was "time to rise from the floor". The patient started the test lying on his back with arms at his sides and was asked to get up as quickly as possible. The rise from floor velocity was calculated as 1/time in seconds taken to stand up. Grading was as follows: 1. Unable to stand, even with use of a chair. 2. Assisted Gowers' sign - requires furniture to assist in rising to full upright posture. 3. Full Gowers' sign - rolls over, stands up with both hands "climbing up" the legs to achieve full upright posture. 4. Half Gowers' sign - rolls over, stands up with one hand support on leg. 5. Rolls to the side and/or stands up with one hand or both hands on the floor to start to rise up but does not touch legs. 6. Stands up without rolling over or using hands. The higher the grade, the better the outcome. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Distance Performed Via 6-minute Walk/Run Test (6MWT, Expressed as Log Least Square Mean) | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | The 6-minute walk/run test (6MWT) assessed the distance walked in 6 minutes. The 6MWT was performed indoors on a flat, smooth path, at least 30 m long and 3 m wide, with a cone at each end around which the patient had to walk. Six progressively numbered markers were used to mark the distance travelled at each minute. Five progressively lettered markers were used to indicate any falls. Two staff members were present during the test; the physiotherapist, to give the patient instructions, and a staff member who followed the patient giving encouragements. The patient was instructed to go from cone to cone as fast as he could but without running, and that he could stop to rest whenever he/she wanted. The time walked, distance walked after each minute, time of each fall and distance walked before each fall were registered. A summary of the 6-minute maximum distance walked/run after 12 months of treatment is reported in minutes. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With < 10% Worsening in 6MWT After 12 Months of Treatment. | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Percentage of patients with \< 10% worsening in 6-Minute Walking Test after 12 months of treatment with Givinostat comparing to placebo patients. |
| Secondary | Count of Participant Who Lose Ambulation During the Study (From Baseline to Month 12) | from baseline to the end of month 12 | Percentage of patients losing the ability to ambulate from baseline to the end of study (Visit 11 or Month 12) |
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Who Fell During the 6MWT | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | A summary of the number of patients who fell and the number of falls occurring during the 6MWT is shown. |
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline to Visit 11 in Muscle Strength Evaluated by Knee Extension, Elbow Flexion | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | Evaluation was performed by mean left and right knee extension, mean left and right elbow flexion using the Hand Held Myometry (HHM). Using it, the muscle strength of the knee extensor and elbow flexor were measured via standardized procedures; 3 measurements were recorded from each muscle group on each side. The mean of the 3 measurements was calculated. Knee Extension: the pt was sitting, pelvis and knee at a 90° angle. His/her feet were above the ground with the femur in neutral rotation. He/she could hold on to the edge of the bed/chair and, in case, additional stabilization was provided at the distal third of the thigh, just above the knee. The HHM was placed on the anterior surface of the lower third of the tibia, proximal to the ankle joint. Elbow flexion: pt lying on his back, arm by his side, elbow flexed at a 90° angle, forearm in supine position. The MMH was placed between the middle and distal third of the forearm, proximal to the radial styloid process. |
| Secondary | Mean Changes From Baseline to Visit 11 in Quality of Life (QoL, Assessed by the 36-item Short Form Survey [SF36]) | after 12 months of treatment (Visit 11) | A summary of QoL (SF-36, Single items Short Form survey) in the ITT set is shown. QoL (SF-36) is assessed considering: * Physical Functioning (PF) * Role-Physical (RP) * Bodily Pain (BP) * General Health (GH) * Vitality (VT) * Social Functioning (SF) * Role-Emotional (RE) * Mental Health (MH) * Physical Component Summary (PCS) * Mental Component Summary (MCS) The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score, the greater the disability. The SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. These measures rely upon patient self-reporting and are widely utilized by managed care organizations for routine monitoring and assessment of care outcomes in adult patients. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03238235/registered