ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03245840

Continuation Study With Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) for Adolescent and Adult Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

NCT03245840, Phase 3, Terminated, Shire; results first posted 2022-12-07

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Continuation Study With Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) for Adolescent and Adult Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE). Trials, record NCT03245840. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03245840

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Continuation Study With Budesonide Oral Suspension (BOS) for Adolescent and Adult Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
NCT number
NCT03245840
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
133 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Shire
Conditions
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Interventions
Budesonide oral suspension
First posted
2017-08-10
Last updated
2025-02-19
Results first posted
2022-12-07
Limitations and caveats
The study was discontinued prematurely as per sponsor's decision.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFrom start of study drug administration up to End of study (EOS) (Up to Month 53)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, and is an important medical event. Both serious and Non-serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure. TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date on or after the first dose of investigational product or a start date before the date of the first dose of investigational product that increased in severity or after the date of the first dose.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsFrom start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)Number of participants with clinically significant physical examination findings were reported. Clinical significance was determined by investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsFrom start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)
Participants were assessed by investigator for any clinically significant changes in vital parameters like temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, BMI, and weight. Vital signs were assessed after the participant had been in a supine position for at least 5 minutes immediately prior to the assessment. The criteria for clinically significant change was as per the investigators discretion.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) For Adolescents Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is less than (\<) -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis). Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 12 was reported.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24Baseline, Month 24
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \<-2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24 was reported.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36Baseline, Month 36
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36 was reported.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48Baseline, Month 48
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48 was reported.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (Up to Month 53)Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)
The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (up to Month 53) was reported.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Cortisol Level After Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Stimulation at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 12 and reported in this outcome measure.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 24Baseline, Month 24
ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 24 and reported in this outcome measure.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsFrom start of study drug administration up to End of study (EOS) (Up to Month 53)The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsFrom start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsFrom start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53)The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) For Adolescents Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. DXA was performed for participants aged 11-17 years only and no participants of this age range were present in PBO-BOS group.
Z-scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24Baseline, Month 24
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. DXA was performed for participants aged 11-17 years only and no participants of this age range were present in PBO-BOS group.
Z-scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36Baseline, Month 36
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. DXA was performed for participants aged 11-17 years only and no participants of this age range were present in PBO-BOS group.
Z-scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48Baseline, Month 48
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. DXA was performed for participants aged 11-17 years only and no participants of this age range were present in PBO-BOS group.
Z-scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (Up to Month 53)Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53)
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories. DXA was performed for participants aged 11-17 years only and no participants of this age range were present in PBO-BOS group.
Z-scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Cortisol Level After Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Stimulation at Month 12Baseline, Month 12
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories.
micrograms per deciliter (mcg/dL)MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 24Baseline, Month 24
The safety set consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of BOS. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signified participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for given categories.
mcg/dLMEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBOS-BOSTEAEs93Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsPBO-BOSTEAEs7Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsBOS-BOSSerious TEAEs11Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEsPBO-BOSSerious TEAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsBOS-BOSMoon Face0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsPBO-BOSMoon Face0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsBOS-BOSAcne2Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsPBO-BOSAcne0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsBOS-BOSHirsutism0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination FindingsPBO-BOSHirsutism0Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDBOS-BOS122
Overall StudySTARTEDPBO-BOS11
Overall StudyTreatedBOS-BOS121
Overall StudyTreatedPBO-BOS10
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDBOS-BOS0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPBO-BOS0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDBOS-BOS122
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPBO-BOS11

Adverse events88

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersBOS-BOS01210
otherMitral valve incompetenceCardiac disordersPBO-BOS1101
otherTricuspid valve incompetenceCardiac disordersBOS-BOS01210
otherTricuspid valve incompetenceCardiac disordersPBO-BOS1101
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersBOS-BOS81218
otherDysphagiaGastrointestinal disordersPBO-BOS0100
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersBOS-BOS41215
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPBO-BOS1101
otherOesophageal food impactionGastrointestinal disordersBOS-BOS51219
otherOesophageal food impactionGastrointestinal disordersPBO-BOS1101

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBOS-BOS2121
Total, all-cause mortalityPBO-BOS010
Total, other adverse eventsBOS-BOS90121
Total, other adverse eventsPBO-BOS710
Total, serious adverse eventsBOS-BOS11121
Total, serious adverse eventsPBO-BOS010

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39954913DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons4

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
BOS-BOS vs PBO-BOS: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital SignsTrial comparisons
BOS-BOS vs PBO-BOS: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory AssessmentsTrial comparisons
BOS-BOS vs PBO-BOS: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
BOS-BOS vs PBO-BOS: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03245840

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03245840/results?page=2