Trial · NCT03245840
Registered outcomes14
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 14 of 14
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | From start of study drug administration up to End of study (EOS) (Up to Month 53) | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, and is an important medical event. Both serious and Non-serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure. TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date on or after the first dose of investigational product or a start date before the date of the first dose of investigational product that increased in severity or after the date of the first dose. |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Findings | From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53) | Number of participants with clinically significant physical examination findings were reported. Clinical significance was determined by investigator. |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs | From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53) | Participants were assessed by investigator for any clinically significant changes in vital parameters like temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, BMI, and weight. Vital signs were assessed after the participant had been in a supine position for at least 5 minutes immediately prior to the assessment. The criteria for clinically significant change was as per the investigators discretion. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) For Adolescents Assessed by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Scan at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is less than (\<) -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis). Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 12 was reported. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24 | Baseline, Month 24 | The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \<-2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 24 was reported. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36 | Baseline, Month 36 | The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 36 was reported. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48 | Baseline, Month 48 | The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at Month 48 was reported. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in BMD For Adolescents Assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (Up to Month 53) | Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53) | The sites for DXA measurement were the lumbar spine at lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 (L1-L4) and whole body. DXA scans for determination of BMD and body composition was performed in participants aged 11-17 years. Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from a reference population in the same age range and with the same sex. In this study, the BMD Z-score is considered abnormal when the z-score is \< -2, suggesting a worse outcome (i.e., osteoporosis) and vice versa. Change from baseline in BMD for adolescents assessed by DXA Scan at EOS (up to Month 53) was reported. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH) Stimulation at Month 12 | Baseline, Month 12 | ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 12 and reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 24 | Baseline, Month 24 | ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 24 and reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 36 | Baseline, Month 36 | ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 36 and reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at Month 48 | Baseline, Month 48 | ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at Month 48 and reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cortisol Level After ACTH Stimulation at EOS (Up to Month 53) | Baseline, EOS (Up to Month 53) | ACTH testing was a standard procedure to measure the levels of cortisol in the blood following the injection of a synthetic form of ACTH (250 microgram \[mcg\]). The type of synthetic and route of administration was per investigator discretion. The change from baseline in cortisol levels was calculated at EOS (up to Month 53) and reported in this outcome measure. |
| Primary | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Assessments | From start of study drug administration up to EOS (Up to Month 53) | Clinical laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, urinalysis; urine pregnancy test. Number of participants with potential clinically significant changes in laboratory parameters which were deemed clinically meaningful by the investigator were reported. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03245840/registered