ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03566238

This Study Will Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of A4250 in Children With PFIC Types 1 or 2

NCT03566238, Phase 3, Completed, Albireo; results first posted 2021-09-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. This Study Will Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of A4250 in Children With PFIC Types 1 or 2. Trials, record NCT03566238. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03566238

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
This Study Will Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of A4250 in Children With PFIC Types 1 or 2
NCT number
NCT03566238
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
62 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Albireo
Conditions
PFIC1, PFIC2
Interventions
A4250 (odevixibat), Placebo
First posted
2018-06-25
Last updated
2025-11-28
Results first posted
2021-09-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes13

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA) Concentration From Baseline to the End of Treatment or Reaching a Level <=70 Micromoles Per Liter (Mcmol/L) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Fasting s-BA baseline was calculated as the average of the last 2 values prior to the first dose. The end value was the average of the values at Weeks 22 and 24 after the start of double-blind treatment. Participants who had at least 70% reduction in fasting s-BA from baseline to the end of treatment or reached \<=70 mcmol/L after 24 weeks of treatment were considered as responder. Participants with missing average at the end of treatment were classified as non-responder. Percentages are rounded to hundredth decimal.
PrimaryPercentage of Positive Pruritus Assessments at the Participant Level Based on the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome (ObsRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
A positive pruritus assessment was defined as a scratching score of \<=1 or at least 1 point drop from baseline. The percentage of positive pruritus assessment was calculated as the number of positive pruritus assessments divided by the total number of reported assessments only when more than 50% of planned assessment recorded by each participant multiplied by 100.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Blood samples for analysis of s-BA were drawn at all visits. Participants were to fast (water intake only was permissible) for at least 4 hours prior to the collection of samples. Exceptions could be made for infants \<12 months of age if they were unable to fast for the full 4 hours. Baseline was the average of the last 2 non-missing values of fasting s-BA concentration prior to the first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Concentration at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24Blood samples were collected to determine the ALT concentration. Baseline was the last available assessment before the first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Growth Parameters at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
The change in the growth parameters was assessed using linear growth deficit \[height (centimeter), weight (kilogram) and body mass index (BMI) (kg/meter square)\] compared to standard growth curve (Z-score) calculated by using the software or methods from the centers for disease control (CDC) website for participants with age \>=2 years old and from the world health organization website for participants with age \<2 years old. Participants whose accurate age was not available, Z-score was not calculated. A Z-score indicated how many standard deviation's (SD) a participant's measurement (like height, weight and BMI), was from the average for their age and sex. A Z-score of 0 represents the median or 50th percentile, while positive or negative values show how far above or below average a measurement was. Baseline was the last available assessment before the first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryPercentage of Responders for Pruritus Assessments Based on Bi-Weekly and Monthly Scores Using the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome Instrument at Weeks 12 and 24Weeks 12 and 24The responder for pruritus scores was defined as a participant who achieved at least a 1-point reduction in the ObsRO pruritus score. Percentages are rounded to hundredth decimal.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Parameters Based on the Albireo Observer-reported Outcome Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8, Weeks 9 to 12, Weeks 13 to 16, Weeks 17 to 20, and Weeks 21 to 24
The sleep disturbance were recorded twice daily via the electronic diary (eDiary). Participants and/or caregivers completed the eDiary every day in the morning and in the evening. The morning diary was completed shortly after the participant woke up and was used to record nighttime itching and scratching severity, aspects of sleep disturbance, and tiredness upon waking (AM scores). The evening/bedtime diary was completed just before the participant went to bed and recorded participant's itching and scratching severity, and tiredness during the day (PM scores). Both morning and bedtime diaries included Albireo ObsRO and PRO items. Baseline was the average of 14-day scores before the first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Sleep Parameters Based on the Albireo Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8, Weeks 9 to 12, Weeks 13 to 16, Weeks 17 to 20, and Weeks 21 to 24
The ObsRO and electronic diary (eDiary) PRO scale called PRUCISION was used to assess pruritus and sleep outcomes. Participants and/or caregivers completed the eDiary every day in the morning (AM scores) and in the evening (PM scores). Specifically, for difficulty falling or staying asleep, the following 2 respective questions were asked in the Morning Daily eDiary: 1) How hard was it to fall asleep last night because of your itching. and 2) How hard was it to stay asleep last night because of your itching. The PRO was a 5-point scale, and scores ranged from 0 (no itching) to 28 (the worst itching), where higher scores indicated a greater amount of itching, sleep disturbance, and tiredness. No subscales were used. Change in sleep parameters measured with the Albireo PRO and ObsRO instruments by each 4-week interval over the 24-week treatment period was assessed. Baseline was the average of 14-day scores before the first dose of study treatment.
SecondaryPercentage of Individual Assessments Meeting the Definition of a Positive Pruritus Assessment at the Participant Level Using the Albireo ObsRO Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
A positive pruritus assessment was defined as a scratching score of \<=1 or at least 1 point drop from baseline based on the Albireo ObsRO instrument. The percentage of positive pruritus assessment was calculated as the number of positive pruritus assessments divided by the total number of reported assessments only when more than 50% of planned assessment recorded by each participant multiplied by 100. At each assessment, the AM or PM score was compared to the baseline AM or PM average, respectively.
SecondaryPercentage of Individual Assessments Meeting the Definition of a Positive Pruritus Assessment at the Participant Level Using the Albireo PRO Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
A positive pruritus assessment was defined as a scratching score of \<=1 or at least 1 point drop from baseline based on the Albireo PRO instrument, only participants \>=8 years of age completed the Albireo PRO instrument. The percentage of positive pruritus assessment was calculated as the number of positive pruritus assessments divided by the total number of reported assessments only when more than 50% of planned assessment recorded by each participant multiplied by 100. At each assessment, the AM or PM score was compared to the baseline AM or PM average, respectively.

Outcomes13

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA) Concentration From Baseline to the End of Treatment or Reaching a Level <=70 Micromoles Per Liter (Mcmol/L) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYPercentage of Positive Pruritus Assessments at the Participant Level Based on the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome (ObsRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.percentage of assessmentsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at Baseline and Weeks 12 and 24 are reported.mcmol/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Concentration at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at Baseline and Weeks 12 and 24 are reported.units/LMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Growth Parameters at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at Baseline and Weeks 12 and 24 are reported.z-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders for Pruritus Assessments Based on Bi-Weekly and Monthly Scores Using the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome Instrument at Weeks 12 and 24Weeks 12 and 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specific timepoints are reported.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sleep Parameters Based on the Albireo Observer-reported Outcome Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8, Weeks 9 to 12, Weeks 13 to 16, Weeks 17 to 20, and Weeks 21 to 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specific timepoints are reported.percentage of daysMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Sleep Parameters Based on the Albireo Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day 1) and Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8, Weeks 9 to 12, Weeks 13 to 16, Weeks 17 to 20, and Weeks 21 to 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Only participants with data collected at specific timepoints are reported.scores on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Individual Assessments Meeting the Definition of a Positive Pruritus Assessment at the Participant Level Using the Albireo ObsRO Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.percentage of assessmentsMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Individual Assessments Meeting the Definition of a Positive Pruritus Assessment at the Participant Level Using the Albireo PRO Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment.percentage of assessmentsMEAN

Results by group399

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA) Concentration From Baseline to the End of Treatment or Reaching a Level <=70 Micromoles Per Liter (Mcmol/L) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
Placebo095% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 16.84percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA) Concentration From Baseline to the End of Treatment or Reaching a Level <=70 Micromoles Per Liter (Mcmol/L) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
A4250 Low Dose43.595% Confidence Interval 23.19 to 65.51percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA) Concentration From Baseline to the End of Treatment or Reaching a Level <=70 Micromoles Per Liter (Mcmol/L) After 24 Weeks of Treatment
A4250 High Dose21.195% Confidence Interval 6.05 to 45.57percentage of participants
Percentage of Positive Pruritus Assessments at the Participant Level Based on the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome (ObsRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodPlacebo28.74Standard Error 5.209percentage of assessments
Percentage of Positive Pruritus Assessments at the Participant Level Based on the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome (ObsRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodA4250 Low Dose58.31Standard Error 6.205percentage of assessments
Percentage of Positive Pruritus Assessments at the Participant Level Based on the Albireo Observer-Reported Outcome (ObsRO) Instrument Over the 24-Week Treatment PeriodA4250 High Dose47.69Standard Error 8.110percentage of assessments
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24PlaceboWeek 127.44Standard Error 24.588mcmol/L
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24A4250 Low DoseWeek 12-113.70Standard Error 38.011mcmol/L
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24A4250 High DoseWeek 12-106.44Standard Error 41.201mcmol/L
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Bile Acid at Weeks 12 and 24PlaceboWeek 2418.64Standard Error 31.559mcmol/L

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo20
Overall StudySTARTEDA4250 Low Dose23
Overall StudySTARTEDA4250 High Dose19
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentPlacebo20
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentA4250 Low Dose23
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentA4250 High Dose19
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo15
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDA4250 Low Dose18
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDA4250 High Dose16
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo5

Adverse events339

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo120
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersA4250 Low Dose023
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersA4250 High Dose019
otherSplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo020
otherSplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disordersA4250 Low Dose023
otherSplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disordersA4250 High Dose219
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo120
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersA4250 Low Dose023
otherEar painEar and labyrinth disordersA4250 High Dose119
otherOtorrhoeaEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo020

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo020
Total, all-cause mortalityA4250 Low Dose023
Total, all-cause mortalityA4250 High Dose019
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo1720
Total, other adverse eventsA4250 Low Dose1923
Total, other adverse eventsA4250 High Dose1619
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo520
Total, serious adverse eventsA4250 Low Dose023
Total, serious adverse eventsA4250 High Dose319

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35780807DERIVEDPubMed
36066745DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03566238

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03566238/results?page=2