ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03653507

A Study of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) Plus CAPOX Compared With Placebo Plus CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Subjects With Claudin (CLDN) 18.2-positive, HER2-negative, Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma (GLOW).

NCT03653507, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.; results first posted 2025-01-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) Plus CAPOX Compared With Placebo Plus CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Subjects With Claudin (CLDN) 18.2-positive, HER2-negative, Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma (GLOW). Trials, record NCT03653507. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03653507

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) Plus CAPOX Compared With Placebo Plus CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Subjects With Claudin (CLDN) 18.2-positive, HER2-negative, Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma (GLOW).
NCT number
NCT03653507
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
507 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Conditions
Locally Advanced Unresectable Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma or Cancer, Locally Advanced Unresectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma or Cancer, Metastatic Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Interventions
zolbetuximab, oxaliplatin, capecitabine, placebo
First posted
2018-08-31
Last updated
2026-09-28
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2018-000519-26
Results first posted
2025-01-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of radiological progressive disease (PD) (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1 by independent review committee \[IRC\]) or death from any cause, whichever was earliest. PD was defined as development of new, or progression of existing metastases to the primary cancer under the study. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysOS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
Secondary
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Physical Functioning as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD: time from randomization to first clinically meaning full deterioration (CMFD) that was confirmed at the next scheduled visit. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status which are scored 1 ('very poor') to 7 ('excellent'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state. Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined if a participant's change from baseline (CFB) exceeded a pre-specified threshold (as per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Oesophago-gastric Questionnaire (OG25) on Abdominal Pain and Discomfort as Measured by EORTC QLQ-OG25 Plus STO22 Belching SubscaleFrom the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD:time from randomization to first CMFD confirmed at next scheduled visit.OG25 evaluated gastric \& gastroesophageal junction cancer-specific symptoms,had 25 items with 6 scales:dysphagia,eating restrictions,reflux,odynophagia,pain, discomfort,anxiety,and 10 single items:trouble with(taste, swallowing saliva, coughing, talking),eating in front of others,dry mouth,body image,choked when swallowing,weight loss and hair loss. STO22: gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire with 22 questions.For OG25 and STO22,items scored on(1:not at all; 2:a little, 3:quite a bit, 4:very much) and 1 question was "yes or no" for STO22.Linear transformation was used; score ranged from 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. An item from STO22 instrument related to belching was used with OG25. CMFD: if participant's CFB exceeded pre-specified threshold (per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used
SecondaryTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Global Health Status as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD: time from randomization to first CMFD that was confirmed at the next scheduled visit.The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status/QoL, which are scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state. Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined if a participant's CFB exceeded a pre-specified threshold (as per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as was assessed by IRC per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as complete resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. PR was defined as partial resolution of at Least some of the clinical symptoms and physical findings.
SecondaryDuration Of Response (DOR)From first response (CR/PR) until 61 months and 12 days
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first response (CR/PR) until the date of PD as assessed by IRC per RECIST 1.1 or date of death from any cause, whichever is earliest.CR was defined as complete resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. PR was defined as partial resolution of at Least some of the clinical symptoms and physical findings. PD was defined as development of new, or progression of existing metastases to the primary cancer under the study. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose until 61 months and 12 days
An Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, and which does not have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.TEAE defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose.
SecondaryNumber of Participant With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, cycle (C) 1 day (D)1 through C60 D1
ECOG grades 0-5, where 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5 = Dead.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 QuestionnaireBaseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow up
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional domain scales: physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive.It is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status/QoL, which are scored 1 ('very poor') to 7 ('excellent'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression Free Survival (PFS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYOverall Survival (OS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARY
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Physical Functioning as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Oesophago-gastric Questionnaire (OG25) on Abdominal Pain and Discomfort as Measured by EORTC QLQ-OG25 Plus STO22 Belching SubscaleFrom the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Global Health Status as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysFASPercentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDuration Of Response (DOR)From first response (CR/PR) until 61 months and 12 daysFAS- All Objective RespondersMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose until 61 months and 12 daysFASParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participant With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, cycle (C) 1 day (D)1 through C60 D1FASParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 QuestionnaireBaseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow upFAS with available data was analyzed.Unit on a scaleMEAN

Results by group3,443

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression Free Survival (PFS)CAPOX+ Zolbetuximab8.2195% Confidence Interval 7.26 to 8.84Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)CAPOX+ Placebo6.8095% Confidence Interval 6.14 to 8.08Months
Overall Survival (OS)CAPOX+ Zolbetuximab14.3295% Confidence Interval 12.09 to 16.39Months
Overall Survival (OS)CAPOX+ Placebo12.1695% Confidence Interval 10.28 to 13.67Months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Physical Functioning as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
CAPOX+ Zolbetuximab7.9595% Confidence Interval 5.88 to 19.78Months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Physical Functioning as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
CAPOX+ Placebo7.9295% Confidence Interval 6.47 to 11.30Months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Oesophago-gastric Questionnaire (OG25) on Abdominal Pain and Discomfort as Measured by EORTC QLQ-OG25 Plus STO22 Belching SubscaleCAPOX+ ZolbetuximabNA95% Confidence Interval 28.16 to NAMonths
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Oesophago-gastric Questionnaire (OG25) on Abdominal Pain and Discomfort as Measured by EORTC QLQ-OG25 Plus STO22 Belching SubscaleCAPOX+ Placebo25.8295% Confidence Interval 18.46 to NAMonths
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Global Health Status as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30CAPOX+ Zolbetuximab9.4095% Confidence Interval 7.36 to 24.80Months
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Global Health Status as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30CAPOX+ Placebo7.4995% Confidence Interval 6.11 to 9.86Months

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCAPOX+ Zolbetuximab254
Overall StudySTARTEDCAPOX+ Placebo249
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCAPOX+ Zolbetuximab9
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCAPOX+ Placebo2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCAPOX+ Zolbetuximab245
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCAPOX+ Placebo247

Adverse events936

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersZolbetuximab90254255
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine179503480
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOxaliplatin179503480
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo89249225
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersZolbetuximab1725441
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine2550363
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersOxaliplatin2550363
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo824922
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersZolbetuximab48254131
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCapecitabine82503212

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityZolbetuximab180254
Total, all-cause mortalityCapecitabine387503
Total, all-cause mortalityOxaliplatin387503
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo207249
Total, other adverse eventsZolbetuximab249254
Total, other adverse eventsCapecitabine481503
Total, other adverse eventsOxaliplatin481503
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo232249
Total, serious adverse eventsZolbetuximab123254
Total, serious adverse eventsCapecitabine249503

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
37524953DERIVEDPubMed
38861294DERIVEDPubMed
40680855DERIVEDPubMed
42095986DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
CAPOX+ Zolbetuximab vs CAPOX+ Placebo: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03653507

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03653507/results?page=2