ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT03653507

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression Free Survival (PFS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of radiological progressive disease (PD) (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1 by independent review committee \[IRC\]) or death from any cause, whichever was earliest. PD was defined as development of new, or progression of existing metastases to the primary cancer under the study. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 daysOS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
Secondary
Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Physical Functioning as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD: time from randomization to first clinically meaning full deterioration (CMFD) that was confirmed at the next scheduled visit. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status which are scored 1 ('very poor') to 7 ('excellent'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state. Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined if a participant's change from baseline (CFB) exceeded a pre-specified threshold (as per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Oesophago-gastric Questionnaire (OG25) on Abdominal Pain and Discomfort as Measured by EORTC QLQ-OG25 Plus STO22 Belching SubscaleFrom the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD:time from randomization to first CMFD confirmed at next scheduled visit.OG25 evaluated gastric \& gastroesophageal junction cancer-specific symptoms,had 25 items with 6 scales:dysphagia,eating restrictions,reflux,odynophagia,pain, discomfort,anxiety,and 10 single items:trouble with(taste, swallowing saliva, coughing, talking),eating in front of others,dry mouth,body image,choked when swallowing,weight loss and hair loss. STO22: gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire with 22 questions.For OG25 and STO22,items scored on(1:not at all; 2:a little, 3:quite a bit, 4:very much) and 1 question was "yes or no" for STO22.Linear transformation was used; score ranged from 0 to 100; higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. An item from STO22 instrument related to belching was used with OG25. CMFD: if participant's CFB exceeded pre-specified threshold (per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used
SecondaryTime to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Using Global Health Status as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
TTCD: time from randomization to first CMFD that was confirmed at the next scheduled visit.The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status/QoL, which are scored 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state. Clinically meaningful deterioration was defined if a participant's CFB exceeded a pre-specified threshold (as per investigator's discretion) denoting a clinically meaningful change. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR)From the date of randomization until 61 months and 12 days
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as was assessed by IRC per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as complete resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. PR was defined as partial resolution of at Least some of the clinical symptoms and physical findings.
SecondaryDuration Of Response (DOR)From first response (CR/PR) until 61 months and 12 days
DOR was defined as the time from the date of the first response (CR/PR) until the date of PD as assessed by IRC per RECIST 1.1 or date of death from any cause, whichever is earliest.CR was defined as complete resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings. PR was defined as partial resolution of at Least some of the clinical symptoms and physical findings. PD was defined as development of new, or progression of existing metastases to the primary cancer under the study. Kaplan-Meier estimates was used.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From first dose until 61 months and 12 days
An Adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, and which does not have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.TEAE defined as an AE observed after starting administration of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose.
SecondaryNumber of Participant With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance StatusBaseline, cycle (C) 1 day (D)1 through C60 D1
ECOG grades 0-5, where 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair and 5 = Dead.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 QuestionnaireBaseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow up
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional domain scales: physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive.It is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument consisting of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), 9 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, general pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status scale. Most items are scored 1 ('not at all') to 4 ('very much') except for the items contributing to the global health status/QoL, which are scored 1 ('very poor') to 7 ('excellent'). All raw domain scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale with higher scores on symptoms indicate a worse health state.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HRQoL Measured by the QLQ-OG25 Questionnaire Plus STO22 Belching Subscale QuestionnaireBaseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow up
OG25 evaluated gastric \& gastroesophageal junction cancer-specific symptoms,had 25 items with 6 scales:dysphagia,eating restrictions,reflux,odynophagia,pain \& discomfort,anxiety,and 10 single items:trouble with(taste, swallowing saliva, coughing, talking),eating in front of others,dry mouth,body image,choked when swallowing,weight loss and hair loss. STO22: gastric cancer quality of life questionnaire with 22 questions.For OG25 and STO22,items scored on(1:not at all; 2:a little, 3:quite a bit, 4:very much) and 1 question was "yes or no" for STO22.Linear transformation was used; score ranged from 0 to 100;higher score=better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms. An item from STO22 instrument related to belching was used with OG25.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HRQoL Measured by Global Pain (GP)Baseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow up
The GP instrument is a single assessment of overall pain and participants were assessed in global pain according to the following response categories: 1= no pain (anymore), 2 = less pain, 3 = no change and 4 = more pain. Low pain scores are considered a better outcome than a high pain score.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HRQoL Measured by the EuroQOL Five Dimensions Questionnaire 5L (EQ-5D-5L) QuestionnaireBaseline, on D1 from C2 through C39, 30-day follow up, 90-day follow up
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcomes consisting of 6 items that cover 5 main domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a general visual analog scale for health status. It was developed by the EuroQol Group for use as a generic, preference-based measure of health outcomes. Each dimension comprises 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems). A unique EQ-5D-5L health state is defined by combining 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions. This questionnaire also records the respondent's self-rated health status on a vertical graduated (0 = the worst health a participant can imagine to 100 = the best health a participant can imagine) visual analogue scale. Responses to the 5 items will also be converted to a weighted health state index (utility score) based on values derived from general population samples.
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK) of Zolbetuximab in Serum: Trough Concentration (Ctrough)Predose on C2D1,C5D1,C9D1,C13D1,C17D1Ctrough was defined as the predose concentration at the end of dosing interval.
SecondaryNumber of Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Positive ParticipantsPredose on C1D1,C2D1,C5D1,C9D1,C13D1,C17D1, 30-day follow up, 90-day Follow upImmunogenicity will be measured by the number of participants that are ADA positive.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03653507/registered