Trial · NCT03765398
Registered outcomes24
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 24
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Maximum Excursion | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | It is the actual magnitude of a self-initiated movement (i.e., how far did he/she actually reach a target) without taking a step or losing balance measured in percentage under single and dual-task conditions. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Primary | Change in 4 Meter Walk Test | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | The total time taken to complete the 4 meters will be noted. Speed will then be determined by using the formula distance (4 meters) covered by time taken to complete the test. Higher speed indicate better performance. |
| Primary | Change of Accuracy in Letter Number Sequencing | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | This is an oral trail making test which includes listing alternate letter and number from the cue given in sequence. This test will be performed under single and dual-task conditions. For the auditory clock test, the participant is provided with cues that include different times of the day (e.g., 3.15) and the participant has to answer a yes if the hour and the minute hand of the clock are on the same side and no if the hour and minute hand are on opposite side of the clock. For the letter number sequencing test, the participant will be provided sets of letters and numbers (e.g.., A1) and will be asked to list in sequence the consecutive letter and numbers (e.g., B2, C3, D4, E5) until the next cue is provided. The performance will be measured in terms of accuracy (number of correct responses out of the total responses) for both the tests. Higher accuracy i.e., higher percentage indicates better performance. |
| Primary | Change in Working Memory | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | List Sorting Memory test to evaluate working memory. This test requires the participant to recall and sequentially list the visually and orally presented stimuli. The accuracy of the participants response is computer generated. Higher value indicate better performance. The total possible responses are 28. |
| Primary | Change in Episodic Memory | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | Picture sequence memory test will assess episodic memory of the individual. The number of adjacent pairs of pictures placed correctly will score a point. The scores are computer generated. Higher value indicate better performance. |
| Primary | Change in Accuracy of Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | Flanker inhibitory control and attention test is used to evaluate the participants ability to inhibit the attention to the stimulus flanking it and focus on a particular stimulus. Accuracy of the responses are recorded and the scores are computer generated. Higher value indicate better performance. |
| Primary | Change in Cognitive Flexibility and Attention | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | Dimensional Change card sort assesses cognitive flexibility and attention. Participants are asked to match a series of bivalent pictures either by colors or shapes accordingly. Responses are computer recorded and accuracy scores are computer generated. Higher value indicate better performance. |
| Primary | Change in Processing Speed | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate Post-training (Week 5) | Pattern comparison processing speed test is used to evaluate the processing speed. The participants are expected to respond whether the two pictures side-by side are same or not the same. Accuracy will be recorded by the number of correct responses out of the total questions in 90 seconds. Scores are computer generated. Higher value indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Movement Velocity | Baseline (Week 0) and Immediate post-training (Week 5) | It is the average speed of center of gravity movement during intentional movement measured in degrees per second under single and dual-task conditions. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Changes in End Point Excursion | Baseline (Week 0) and post-training (Week 5) | It is the magnitude of a self-initiated movement (i.e., how far he/she wills to reach a target) without taking a step or losing balance measured in percentage under single and dual-task conditions. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Directional Control | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | It is the quality of a self-initiated movement (i.e., amount of movement actually exhibited towards the target to the amount of extraneous movement away from the target) measured in percentage under single and dual-task conditions. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Postural Stability During Reactive Balance Control (Single and Dual-task) | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | Reactive balance control will be examined via the stance perturbation test under single and dual-task conditions (simultaneous performance of Letter number sequencing task or auditory stroop task). Postural stability can be defined as simultaneous control of center of mass (COM) position and velocity during slip-like or trip like perturbation relative to the rear edge of base of support (rear heel). The position is normalized with the individual's foot length, and velocity by square root of gravitational acceleration and individual's body height. Larger values indicate greater stability. |
| Secondary | Change in Accuracy of Auditory Stroop | Baseline (Week 0) and post-training (Week 5) | This test involves responding to the pitch (high or low) of the words "High" or "Low". This test will be performed under single and dual-task conditions. Accuracy (number of correct responses out of the total responses) of Auditory stroop will be calculated. Higher accuracy indicates better performance. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Dual-task Cost | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | Dual-task motor and cognitive cost will be calculated using the formula- \[(Dual-task performance- Single Task performance)/Single task performance\*100\]. This will be calculated for dual-task performance during intentional postural sway, reactive balance control and gait conditions. Lower cost indicates better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Gait Parameters | Baseline (Week 0) and post-training (Week 5) | Spatial and temporal gait parameters like step length, cadence and stride length will be determined during single and dual-task walking performance via the GaitRite mat. Higher values for step length and stride length, and lower cadence indicates better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Interference in the Reaction Time | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | Interference in the reaction time via visual stroop task where the individual is expected to respond to the color in which the word is printed and not read the word. Performance will be identified via time taken to complete the test. Lower time indicates better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Language Fluency | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | Language fluency via verbal and category task will be administered. Performance will be identified via the total number of appropriate words responded on each of the task. Higher values indicate better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Interference in Reaction Time | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | The individual is asked to hit a key on the number keypad when a cue appears on the screen. Performance will be identified with time taken to hit the key after the individual sees the cue in seconds. Lower time indicates better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Paired Associative Learning | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | Paired associated learning via grid task will be administered. Accuracy (number of correct responses out of the total responses) will be represented in percentage. Higher value indicates better performance. |
| Secondary | Change in Spatial Working Memory | Baseline (Week 0) and Post-training (Week 5) | List Sorting Memory test to evaluate working memory. This test requires the participant to recall and sequentially list the visually and orally presented stimuli. The accuracy of the participant's response is computer generated. Higher value indicates better performance. The minimum score is 0% and maximum score is 100% |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03765398/registered