ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT03890666

A 12-Week Treatment Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Albuterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler With Integrated Electronic Module Digital System (eMDPI DS) in Participants13 Years or Older With Asthma

NCT03890666, Phase 4, Completed, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.; results first posted 2022-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A 12-Week Treatment Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Albuterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler With Integrated Electronic Module Digital System (eMDPI DS) in Participants13 Years or Older With Asthma. Trials, record NCT03890666. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT03890666

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A 12-Week Treatment Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Albuterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler With Integrated Electronic Module Digital System (eMDPI DS) in Participants13 Years or Older With Asthma
NCT number
NCT03890666
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
333 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Conditions
Asthma
Interventions
Albuterol eMDPI DS, albuterol
First posted
2019-03-26
Last updated
2026-03-19
Results first posted
2022-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes17

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline to Week 12
Meaningful asthma improvement was defined as an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of at least 20 at the end of the 12-week treatment period or an increase of at least 3 units on the ACT score from baseline at the end of the 12-week treatment period. The ACT was a simple, participant-completed tool used to assess overall asthma control. The 5 items included in the ACT assess daytime and night-time asthma symptoms, use of reliever medication, and impact of asthma on daily functioning. Each item in the ACT was scored on a 5-point scale, with a summation of all items providing scores ranging from 5 to 25. The scores span the continuum of poor control of asthma (score of 5) to complete control of asthma (score of 25), with a cutoff score of 19 and below indicating participants with poorly controlled asthma.
SecondaryNumber of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who had discussions with iHCP regarding inhaler technique or adherence are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Decreased Doses of Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who received decreased dose of inhaled medication during the 12-week treatment period are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Increased Doses of Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who received increased dose of inhaled medication during the 12-week treatment period are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Changes to Different Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who received different inhaled medication during the 12-week treatment period are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Additional Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who received additional inhaled medication during the 12-week treatment period are reported.
SecondaryNumber of Addition of a Systemic Corticosteroid Medication for Asthma TherapyBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants who received additional systemic corticosteroid medication for asthma therapy during the 12-week treatment period are reported.
SecondaryFrequency of Intervention to Manage Comorbid Conditions Associated With Poor Asthma ControlBaseline up to Week 12Number of participants with different frequency of intervention to manage comorbid conditions such as Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Sinusitis are reported.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Weekly Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (SABA) Usage at Week 12 for the DS GroupBaseline, Week 12
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 12 for the DS GroupBaseline, Week 12

Outcomes17

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment PeriodBaseline to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Decreased Doses of Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Increased Doses of Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Changes to Different Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Additional Inhaled MedicationBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Addition of a Systemic Corticosteroid Medication for Asthma TherapyBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYFrequency of Intervention to Manage Comorbid Conditions Associated With Poor Asthma ControlBaseline up to Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Mean Weekly Short-acting Beta2 Agonist (SABA) Usage at Week 12 for the DS GroupBaseline, Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
mcgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Number of SABA-free Days at Week 12 for the DS GroupBaseline, Week 12
mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP (IMP is albuterol eMDPI for the DS group and standard-of-care albuterol-administering rescue medication for the CC group) and at least 1 postbaseline assessment on any of the study endpoints. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
daysMEAN

Results by group65

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment PeriodConcurrent Control (CC)54.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Meaningful Asthma Improvement at the End of 12-Week Treatment PeriodDigital System (DS)61.33percentage of participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceConcurrent Control (CC)No discussion121Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceDigital System (DS)No discussion87Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceConcurrent Control (CC)1 discussion38Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceDigital System (DS)1 discussion39Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceConcurrent Control (CC)2 discussions3Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceDigital System (DS)2 discussions7Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceConcurrent Control (CC)3 discussions0Participants
Number of Discussions Between Participant and Investigational Center Healthcare Professional (iHCP) Regarding Inhaler Technique or AdherenceDigital System (DS)3 discussions6Participants

Participant flow10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDConcurrent Control (CC)166
Overall StudySTARTEDDigital System (DS)167
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetConcurrent Control (CC)166
Overall StudySafety Analysis SetDigital System (DS)150
Overall StudyModified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Analysis SetConcurrent Control (CC)163
Overall StudyModified Intent-to-treat (mITT) Analysis SetDigital System (DS)150
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDConcurrent Control (CC)162
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDigital System (DS)149
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDConcurrent Control (CC)4
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDigital System (DS)18

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersConcurrent Control (CC)81669
otherAsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disordersDigital System (DS)1115012
seriousCOVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestationsConcurrent Control (CC)11661
seriousCOVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestationsDigital System (DS)01500
seriousSARS-CoV-2 sepsisInfections and infestationsConcurrent Control (CC)11661
seriousSARS-CoV-2 sepsisInfections and infestationsDigital System (DS)01500
seriousOvarian cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Concurrent Control (CC)01660
seriousOvarian cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)Digital System (DS)11501

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityConcurrent Control (CC)0166
Total, all-cause mortalityDigital System (DS)0150
Total, other adverse eventsConcurrent Control (CC)8166
Total, other adverse eventsDigital System (DS)11150
Total, serious adverse eventsConcurrent Control (CC)1166
Total, serious adverse eventsDigital System (DS)1150

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Concurrent Control (CC) vs Digital System (DS): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Concurrent Control (CC) vs Digital System (DS): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03890666

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT03890666/results?page=2