ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04442503

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAGE-217 in Participants With Severe Postpartum Depression (PPD)

NCT04442503, Phase 3, Completed, Biogen; results first posted 2023-06-22

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAGE-217 in Participants With Severe Postpartum Depression (PPD). Trials, record NCT04442503. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04442503

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of SAGE-217 in Participants With Severe Postpartum Depression (PPD)
NCT number
NCT04442503
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
200 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Biogen
Conditions
Depression, Postpartum
Interventions
SAGE-217, Placebo
First posted
2020-06-22
Last updated
2023-11-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-001424-34
Results first posted
2023-06-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15Baseline and Day 15
The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of 17 individual items related to the following symptoms: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early, middle, late), work and activities (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), retardation, agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe. The total score is the sum of the 17 individual items, ranges from 0 to 52; where a higher score indicates more depression. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Mixed Model for Repeated Measures (MMRM) was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScoreBaseline, Days 3, 28 and 45
The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of 17 individual items related to the following symptoms: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early, middle, late), work and activities (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), retardation, agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe. The total score is the sum of the 17 individual items, ranges from 0 to 52; where a higher score indicates more depression. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity Scale (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline and Day 15
The CGI-S is a 7-point Likert scale to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who had the same diagnosis. A participant was assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating as 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; and 7= extremely ill participants. A lower score indicates a better outcome. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. MMRM was used for the analysis.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HAM-D ResponseDays 15 and 45
The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of 17 individual items related to the following symptoms: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early, middle, late), work and activities (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), retardation, agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe. The total score is the sum of the 17 individual items, ranges from 0 to 52; where a higher score indicates more depression. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. HAM-D response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in HAM-D total score from baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With HAM-D RemissionDays 15 and 45
The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of 17 individual items related to the following symptoms: depressed mood (sadness, hopeless, helpless, worthless), feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia (early, middle, late), work and activities (slowness of thought and speech; impaired ability to concentrate; decreased motor activity), retardation, agitation, anxiety (psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe. The total score is the sum of the 17 individual items, ranges from 0 to 52; where a higher score indicates more depression. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement. HAM-D remission was defined as having a HAM-D total score of ≤7.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ResponseDay 15
The CGI-I employs a 7-point Likert scale to measure the overall improvement in the participant's condition posttreatment. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. Response choices include 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, and 7=very much worse. The CGI-I was only rated at posttreatment assessments. By definition, all CGI-I assessments are evaluated against baseline conditions. CGI-I response was defined as having a CGI-I score of "very much improved" or "much improved."
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total ScoreBaseline and Day 15
The 14-item HAM-A was used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. Each 14-items were defined by a series of symptoms, and measured both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety). The HAM-A total score was calculated as the sum of the 14 individual item scores. The scoring for HAM-A is calculated by assigning scores of 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe), with a total score range of 0 to 56 where \<17 indicated mild severity, 18 to 24, mild to moderate severity, and 25 to 30, moderate to severe severity. A negative change from baseline in HAM-A total score indicated improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total ScoreBaseline and Day 15
The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. It includes questions on the following symptoms: apparent sadness; reported sadness; inner tension; reduced sleep; reduced appetite; concentration difficulties; lassitude; inability to feel; pessimistic thoughts; and suicidal thoughts. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total score ranges from 0 to 60 with a higher score indicating more depression. A negative change from baseline in MADRS total score indicated improvement.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HAM-D SubscaleBaseline and Day 15
17-item HAM-D scale is used for severity of depression. HAM-D subscales: Core subscale(depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, work and activities, and retardation/20x100; Anxiety subscale\[anxiety(psychic and somatic), somatic symptoms (gastrointestinal and general), hypochondriasis, and insight loss of weight\]/18x100; Bech-6 subscale(depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, anxiety psychic, and somatic symptoms general)/22x100; Maier score(depressed mood, feelings of guilt, work and activities, retardation, agitation, and anxiety psychic)/24x100. Each item was scored in range of 0 to 2 or 0 to 4 (0=none to 2 or 4=severe), higher score=more depression. 4 Subscale scores were calculated as sum of individual rating scores related to each subscale, divided by total possible score within subscale, multiplied by 100. Scores were transformed to scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores=more severe depression. Negative CFB=improvement. MMRM was used for analysis.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Self-Reported Measures of Depressive Symptoms, as Assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total ScoreBaseline, Days 3, 8,15, 21, 28 and 45
The EPDS is a self-rated depressive symptom severity scale specific to the perinatal period which consists of 10 individual items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 points. The EPDS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores, ranging from 0 points to 30 points with a higher score indicating more depression. A negative change indicates improvement.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15Baseline and Day 15
Full Analysis Set(FAS)=randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM for Anxiety(HAM-A), Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale(MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity(CGI-S), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire(PHQ-9), or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed=number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScoreBaseline, Days 3, 28 and 45
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions - Severity Scale (CGI-S) ScoreBaseline and Day 15
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With HAM-D ResponseDays 15 and 45
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants available for analyses. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest whole number.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With HAM-D RemissionDays 15 and 45
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest whole number.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) ResponseDay 15
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) Total ScoreBaseline and Day 15
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total ScoreBaseline and Day 15
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Overall number analyzed are the number of participants available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in HAM-D SubscaleBaseline and Day 15
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Self-Reported Measures of Depressive Symptoms, as Assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) Total ScoreBaseline, Days 3, 8,15, 21, 28 and 45
FAS included all randomized participants who received any amount of IP and had valid baseline and at least one valid post-baseline total score in at least one of HAM-D, HAM-A, MADRS, CGI-S, EPDS and PHQ-9, or at least 1 post-baseline value of CGI-I. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group78

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15PlaceboBaseline28.8Standard Deviation 2.34score on a scale
Change From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15SAGE-217 50 mgBaseline28.6Standard Deviation 2.49score on a scale
Change From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15PlaceboChange from Baseline at Day 15-11.4Standard Deviation 8.50score on a scale
Change From Baseline (CFB) in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) Total Score at Day 15SAGE-217 50 mgChange from Baseline at Day 15-15.6Standard Deviation 7.62score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScorePlaceboBaseline28.8Standard Deviation 2.34score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScoreSAGE-217 50 mgBaseline28.6Standard Deviation 2.49score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScorePlaceboChange from Baseline at Day 3-6.3Standard Deviation 6.78score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScoreSAGE-217 50 mgChange from Baseline at Day 3-9.5Standard Deviation 7.40score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScorePlaceboChange from Baseline at Day 28-13.5Standard Deviation 8.77score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the 17-item HAM-D Total ScoreSAGE-217 50 mgChange from Baseline at Day 28-16.3Standard Deviation 8.34score on a scale

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo101
Overall StudySTARTEDSAGE-217 50 mg99
Overall StudyNumber of Participants Received Investigational Product (IP)Placebo98
Overall StudyNumber of Participants Received Investigational Product (IP)SAGE-217 50 mg98
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo86
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSAGE-217 50 mg84
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo15
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSAGE-217 50 mg15

Adverse events76

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersPlacebo598
otherSomnolenceNervous system disordersSAGE-217 50 mg2698
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo1098
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersSAGE-217 50 mg1398
otherSedationNervous system disordersPlacebo198
otherSedationNervous system disordersSAGE-217 50 mg1198
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo1398
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersSAGE-217 50 mg998
otherMemory impairmentNervous system disordersPlacebo098
otherMemory impairmentNervous system disordersSAGE-217 50 mg398

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo098
Total, all-cause mortalitySAGE-217 50 mg098
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo5298
Total, other adverse eventsSAGE-217 50 mg6498
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo098
Total, serious adverse eventsSAGE-217 50 mg298

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
37491938DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
SAGE-217 50 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
SAGE-217 50 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04442503

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04442503/results?page=2