ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04503551

A Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy Without Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Ranibizumab Delivered Via the Port Delivery System Relative to the Comparator Arm

NCT04503551, Phase 3, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2025-11-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy Without Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Ranibizumab Delivered Via the Port Delivery System Relative to the Comparator Arm. Trials, record NCT04503551. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04503551

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Multicenter, Randomized Study in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy Without Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema To Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Ranibizumab Delivered Via the Port Delivery System Relative to the Comparator Arm
NCT number
NCT04503551
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
174 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Diabetic Retinopathy
Interventions
PDS Implant Pre-Filled with 100 mg/mL Ranibizumab, Intravitreal Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Injection
First posted
2020-08-07
Last updated
2026-04-02
Results first posted
2025-11-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes35

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) method was used for analysis and weighted percentage of participants are estimated and reported in this outcome measure. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. SD OCT= spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
SecondaryRate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52
A vision threatening complication is defined as proliferative DR (PDR) or anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV) or center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). CI-DME is defined as central foveal thickness (CST) ≥325 micrometres (μm) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
SecondaryRate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52
The KM method was used for analysis, and estimates are in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye.
SecondaryRate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52
CI-DME is defined as CST ≥325 μm on SD-OCT. The KM method was used for analysis, and estimated in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye.
SecondaryRate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 2-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS at Week 52Week 52
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
SecondaryRate of Participants Developing a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 3-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over TimeBaseline up to Week 112
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over TimeBaseline up to Week 112
ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy.
SecondaryTime to First Development of Either PDR, ASNV, or CI-DMEBaseline up to Week 112

Outcomes35

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS at Week 52Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRate of Participants Developing a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52From Baseline through Week 52ITT Population included all participants who were randomized. Participants were grouped according to treatment assigned at randomization.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over TimeBaseline up to Week 112
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over TimeBaseline up to Week 112
SECONDARYTime to First Development of Either PDR, ASNV, or CI-DMEBaseline up to Week 112

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52PDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL80.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52Comparator Arm9.0percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52PDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL7.1percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52Comparator Arm47.0percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52PDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL1.0percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52Comparator Arm42.4percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52PDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL7.1percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52Comparator Arm47.0percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52PDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL3.0percentage of participants
Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52Comparator Arm46.4percentage of participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL106
Overall StudySTARTEDComparator Arm68
Overall StudySafety Evaluable PopulationPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL105
Overall StudySafety Evaluable PopulationComparator Arm68
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDComparator Arm0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL106
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDComparator Arm68

Adverse events47

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCataractEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL61058
otherConjunctival haemorrhageEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL7910593
otherConjunctival hyperaemiaEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL1210512
otherConjunctival oedemaEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL1010510
otherDiabetic retinal oedemaEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL61057
otherDiabetic retinopathyEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL71058
otherEye painEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL910515
otherForeign body sensation in eyesEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL91059
otherIritisEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL1010510
otherOcular hypertensionEye disordersPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL71059

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL0106
Total, other adverse eventsPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL89105
Total, serious adverse eventsPDS With Ranibizumab 100 mg/mL17105

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40048178DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04503551

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04503551/registered?page=2