Trial · NCT04503551
Registered outcomes35
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 35
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study-Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS) at Week 52 | Baseline, Week 52 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. The Cochran-Mantel Haenszel (CMH) method was used for analysis and weighted percentage of participants are estimated and reported in this outcome measure. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. SD OCT= spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. |
| Secondary | Rate of Participants Developing a Vision-Threatening Complication or Center-involved Diabetic Macular Edema (CI-DME) Through Week 52 | From Baseline through Week 52 | A vision threatening complication is defined as proliferative DR (PDR) or anterior segment neovascularization (ASNV) or center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME). CI-DME is defined as central foveal thickness (CST) ≥325 micrometres (μm) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. |
| Secondary | Rate of Participants Developing PDR or ASNV Through Week 52 | From Baseline through Week 52 | The KM method was used for analysis, and estimates are in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. |
| Secondary | Rate of Participants Developing CI-DME Through Week 52 | From Baseline through Week 52 | CI-DME is defined as CST ≥325 μm on SD-OCT. The KM method was used for analysis, and estimated in terms of event rate. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. |
| Secondary | Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52 | From Baseline through Week 52 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 2-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS at Week 52 | Week 52 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Participants receiving supplemental treatments, prohibited therapy, or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) were considered non-responders. Missing values not preceded by these intercurrent events were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest decimal point. |
| Secondary | Rate of Participants Developing a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Through Week 52 | From Baseline through Week 52 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. Composite strategy (i.e., considered to be an event) was applied to participants who received supplemental or prohibited therapy or PRP in the study eye. The rate of participants developing ≥ 3-step worsening on the ETDRS-DRSS was calculated using the KM method. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-Step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 3-step Improvement From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR ), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale , from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. |
| Secondary | Time to First Development of Either PDR, ASNV, or CI-DME | Baseline up to Week 112 | |
| Secondary | Time to First Development of PDR or ASNV | Baseline up to Week 112 | |
| Secondary | Time to First Development of CI-DME | Baseline up to Week 112 | CI-DME is defined as CST ≥325 μm on SD-OCT. |
| Secondary | Time to First Development of a ≥ 2-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS | Baseline up to Week 112 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. |
| Secondary | Time to First Development of a ≥ 3-Step Worsening From Baseline on the ETDRS-DRSS | Baseline up to Week 112 | ETDRS-DRSS classifies diabetic retinopathy (DR) into 12 severity steps ranging from absence of retinopathy to advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). DRSS grades= 10 (DR absent) - 85 (very advanced PDR), DRSS 90 = ungradable. All DRSS values are converted into a 12-level scale, from 1 (DR absent) to 12 (very advanced PDR), allowing derivation of ≥2-step change from baseline for post-baseline assessment. A lower score represents less advanced diabetic retinopathy. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured on the ETDRS Chart Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | BCVA was measured at a starting test distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision Vision\^TM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R). The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a higher score indicates better visual acuity. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Lost <15, <10 and <5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | BCVA was measured at a starting test distance of 4 meters using a set of three Precision VisionTM or Lighthouse distance acuity charts (modified ETDRS Charts 1, 2, and R). The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score attainable), and a higher score indicates better visual acuity. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a BCVA Score of 69 Letters (20/40 Approximate Snellen Equivalent) or Better Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | BCVA is measured using the ETDRS visual acuity chart starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The number of letters read correctly, Snellen fraction are converted to a decimal scale. There are 11 lines on a standard Snellen chart ranging from 0.1 (20/200) at worst to 2.0 (20/10) at best. 20/20 on the decimal scale is equal to 1.0. The higher the number of letters read correctly (higher number on the decimal scale), the better the vision (or visual acuity). The Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better is 69 or more letters correctly read in the ETDRS chart. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CST as Measured on SD-OCT Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | CST is defined as the average thickness of the central 1 millimeter (mm) circle of the ETDRS grid centered on the fovea measured between the internal limiting membrane and the Bruch's membrane. CST is measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A central reading center graded the SD-OCT digital images. A negative change from baseline value represents a reduction in macular edema. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Macular Volume (TMV) as Measured on SD-OCT Over Time | Baseline up to Week 112 | Total macular volume in cubic millimeter (mm\^3), is the calculated volume from the layers of the retina based off OCT imaging. TMV is measured using SD-OCT. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) and Severity of Ocular AEs in the PDS Arm | From first dose of study drug through Week 52 | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product,regardless of causal attribution.An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable \& unintended sign,symptom,or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product,whether considered related to the pharmaceutical product.Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.Ocular AEs are the events which are localized in the ocular region,graded according to the AE Severity Grading Scale as Mild:discomfort noticed,but no disruption of normal daily activity;Moderate:Discomfort sufficient to reduce or affect normal daily activity;Severe incapacitating with inability to work or to perform normal daily activity.Number of participants with ocular AEs in the study eye are reported in this outcome measure.As prespecified in the protocol, this outcome measure was applicable to participants in the PDS arm only. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04503551/registered