ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04518995

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CTP-543 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata (THRIVE-AA1)

NCT04518995, Phase 3, Completed, Concert Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2023-05-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CTP-543 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata (THRIVE-AA1). Trials, record NCT04518995. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04518995

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CTP-543 in Adults With Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata (THRIVE-AA1)
NCT number
NCT04518995
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
706 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Concert Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Alopecia Areata
Interventions
CTP-543 matching placebo, CTP-543, CTP-543
First posted
2020-08-19
Last updated
2023-05-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-002704-40
Results first posted
2023-05-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24Week 24SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss with scores ranging in severity from 0 (no scalp hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete scalp hair loss).
SecondaryPercentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
SPRO is a questionnaire answered by the participant and designed to measure how satisfied alopecia areata participants are with their hair at the time of the assessment. The responses range from 1 to 5: 1= very satisfied, 2= satisfied, 3= neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4= dissatisfied, and 5= very dissatisfied. Responders were defined as participants with responses of "satisfied" or "very satisfied".
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute SALT Score of ≤20 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss with scores ranging in severity from 0 (no scalp hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete scalp hair loss).
SecondaryRelative Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss with scores ranging in severity from 0 (no scalp hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete scalp hair loss). Relative change (percent change) to baseline is calculated as: 100 x (\[post-baseline SALT score - baseline SALT score\]/baseline SALT score).
SecondaryPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CGI-I is a questionnaire that asks the clinician to evaluate the improvement or worsening of the participant's alopecia areata as compared to the start of the study on a 7-point scale. Responses range from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved). Responders were defined as participants with responses of 6 (much improved) or 7 (very much improved).
SecondaryPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
The PGI-I is a self-administered questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the improvement or worsening of their alopecia areata as compared to the start of the study on a 7-point scale. Responses range from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved). Responders were defined as participants with responses of 6 (much improved) or 7 (very much improved).
SecondaryChange in the Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CGI-S is a questionnaire that asks the clinician to evaluate the symptom severity of the participant's alopecia areata at the time of assessment. The symptom severity was rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1=normal, no hair loss; 2=borderline hair loss; 3=mild hair loss; 4=moderate hair loss; 5=marked hair loss; 6=severe hair loss; 7=among the most extreme hair loss. Higher scores indicate more hair loss. A negative change from baseline indicates less hair loss.
SecondaryChange in the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
The PGI-S is a self-administered questionnaire that asks the participant to evaluate the symptom severity of their alopecia areata at the time of assessment. Symptom severity was rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, where 1=normal, no hair loss; 2=borderline hair loss; 3=mild hair loss; 4=moderate hair loss; 5=marked hair loss; 6=severe hair loss; 7=among the most extreme hair loss. Higher scores indicate more hair loss. A negative change from baseline indicates less hair loss.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% and 90% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24
SALT is a quantitative assessment of scalp hair loss with scores ranging in severity from 0 (no scalp hair loss) to a maximum of 100 (complete scalp hair loss). Percentage of participants achieving at least a 75% and 90% relative reduction in SALT score from baseline at Weeks 12 and 24 are reported.
SecondaryChange in the Brigham Eyebrow Tool for Alopecia (BETA) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24
BETA is a clinician-rated scale that assesses the total eyebrow hair present. The BETA score is calculated based on hair density and surface area of each individual eyebrow of the participant, ranging from 0 to 3, where 0 = no eyebrow, 1 = minimal eyebrow, 2 = moderate eyebrow, 3 = normal eyebrow. The BETA score is the sum of the right and left eyebrow scores, ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate less hair loss of eyebrows. A positive change from baseline indicates less hair loss of eyebrows.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24Week 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute SALT Score of ≤20 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRelative Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% and 90% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Brigham Eyebrow Tool for Alopecia (BETA) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group234

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24Placebo0.8percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24CTP-543 8 mg BID29.6percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24CTP-543 12 mg BID41.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24PlaceboWeek 1211.9percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24CTP-543 8 mg BIDWeek 1235.3percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24CTP-543 12 mg BIDWeek 1246.4percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24PlaceboWeek 168.3percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24CTP-543 8 mg BIDWeek 1638.2percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24CTP-543 12 mg BIDWeek 1651.5percentage of responders
Percentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24PlaceboWeek 206.1percentage of responders

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo140
Overall StudySTARTEDCTP-543 8 mg BID351
Overall StudySTARTEDCTP-543 12 mg BID215
Overall StudyEfficacy PopulationPlacebo140
Overall StudyEfficacy PopulationCTP-543 8 mg BID351
Overall StudyEfficacy PopulationCTP-543 12 mg BID215
Overall StudySafety PopulationPlacebo140
Overall StudySafety PopulationCTP-543 8 mg BID350
Overall StudySafety PopulationCTP-543 12 mg BID215
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo129

Adverse events48

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo8140
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsCTP-543 8 mg BID19350
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsCTP-543 12 mg BID15215
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo5140
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsCTP-543 8 mg BID18350
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsCTP-543 12 mg BID8215
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo9140
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsCTP-543 8 mg BID9350
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsCTP-543 12 mg BID8215
otherBlood creatine phosphokinase (increased)InvestigationsPlacebo2140

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0140
Total, all-cause mortalityCTP-543 8 mg BID0351
Total, all-cause mortalityCTP-543 12 mg BID0215
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo31140
Total, other adverse eventsCTP-543 8 mg BID117350
Total, other adverse eventsCTP-543 12 mg BID75215
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo4140
Total, serious adverse eventsCTP-543 8 mg BID4350
Total, serious adverse eventsCTP-543 12 mg BID1215

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39053611DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04518995

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04518995/results?page=2