ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04518995

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score of ≤20 at Week 24Week 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders on the Hair Satisfaction Patient Reported Outcome (SPRO) Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute SALT Score of ≤20 at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYRelative Change in SALT Scores From Baseline at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Responders Assessed Using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of respondersNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Clinician Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% and 90% Relative Reduction in SALT Score From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Brigham Eyebrow Tool for Alopecia (BETA) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Brigham Eyelash Tool for Alopecia (BELA) Scores From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the SPRO Scale From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a ≥2-point Change From Baseline in the SPRO Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in the Individual Items of the Hair Quality Patient Reported Outcome (QPRO) Scale From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in the Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) From Baseline at Week 24Baseline and Week 24
Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis of this outcome measure. Number of participants analyzed indicates the number of participants with data available for analysis at the specified timepoint.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving an Absolute SALT Score of ≤10 at Week 24Week 24Efficacy population included all participants who were randomized in the study and dispensed study drug during the treatment period.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04518995/outcomes