ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT04667104

A Study of JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs, and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

NCT04667104, Phase 2, Completed, Janssen Research & Development, LLC; results first posted 2024-07-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs, and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Trials, record NCT04667104. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04667104

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of JNJ-73763989, JNJ-56136379, Nucleos(t)Ide Analogs, and Pegylated Interferon Alpha-2a in Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
NCT number
NCT04667104
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
48 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Conditions
Hepatitis B, Chronic
Interventions
JNJ-73763989, Tenofovir disoproxil, Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), Entecavir (ETV) monohydrate, PegIFN-alpha2a
First posted
2020-12-14
Last updated
2024-07-03
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2020-003956-34
Results first posted
2024-07-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes31

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2 log10 International Unit/Millilitres (IU/mL) in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels From Baseline to Week 24From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24
Percentage of participants with a reduction of at least 2 log10IU/mL in HBsAg levels from baseline to Week 24 were reported. A responder was defined as a participant with reduction of at least 2 log10 IU/mL in HBsAg levels from baseline at Week 24.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Percentage of participants with TEAEs were reported. An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or follow-up period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that had worsened since baseline.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the intervention period or follow-up period or that were a consequence of a pre-existing condition that had worsened since baseline. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs (pulse rate, and blood pressure \[systolic and diastolic\]) were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Findings as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory findings (including hematology, blood biochemistry, and urinalysis) were reported. Only parameters in which any participant had abnormality are reported below.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to Week 28Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in 12- lead ECGs (heart rate, PR, QRS and QT corrected \[QTc\]) were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination were reported.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Ophthalmic Examination as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24Number of participants with abnormalities in Ophthalmic examination were planned to be reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Protocol-defined Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at End of Study Intervention (EOSI)At Week 24 (EOSI)
Percentage of participants meeting the protocol-defined NA treatment completion criteria at EOSI were reported. NA treatment completion criteria are defined based on laboratory results at Week 24 were; HBsAg \<10 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative; HBV DNA \<20 IU/mL, that is, lower limit of quantification(LLOQ); alanine aminotransferase(ALT) \<3\*ULN.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Levels Below Different Cut-offs
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Percentage of participants with HBeAg levels below different cut-offs were reported. The cut-offs for HBeAg levels were as followed:\< 100 IU/mL, \< 10 IU/mL, \< 1 IU/mL, \< LLOQ (0.11 IU/mL).

Outcomes31

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2 log10 International Unit/Millilitres (IU/mL) in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels From Baseline to Week 24From Baseline (Day 1) to Week 24
Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were enrolled and who received at least 1 dose of study intervention within this intervention-specific appendix (ISA). Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for specified arm only.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Findings as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this endpoint and n(number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECGs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to Week 28Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Follow-Up Period as pre-specified in protocol.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Ophthalmic Examination as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTreatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24
Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants were analyzed according to the study intervention they actually received. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed at TP 1 and TP 2 for participants with diabetes/hypertension only. Since no subject had diabetes/hypertension hence data for this OM was not collected and analyzed as pre-specified in protocol.
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Protocol-defined Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Treatment Completion Criteria at End of Study Intervention (EOSI)At Week 24 (EOSI)
FAS included all participants who were enrolled and who received at least 1 dose of study intervention within this ISA. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for Treatment Period 1 and Follow-Up period as pre-specified in protocol.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Hepatitis B e Antigen (HBeAg) Levels Below Different Cut-offs
Treatment Period 1: From Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 12; Treatment Period 2: From Week 12 up to Week 24; Follow-Up Period: From Week 24 up to follow-up Week 48 (with window period of +/- 4 days, that is Week 72.4)
FAS included all participants who were enrolled and who received at least 1 dose of study intervention within this ISA. Here N (Number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants that were evaluable for this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group211

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2 log10 International Unit/Millilitres (IU/mL) in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Levels From Baseline to Week 24TP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA64.690% Confidence Interval 51.73percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA52.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA87.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)60.4percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA2.1percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)8.3percentage of participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA0Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs as a Measure of Safety and TolerabilityFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0Participants

Participant flow27

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12STARTEDTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA48
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12STARTEDTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12STARTEDFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12COMPLETEDTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA48
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12COMPLETEDTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12COMPLETEDFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12NOT COMPLETEDTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12NOT COMPLETEDTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA0
TP 1: From Week 1 to Week 12NOT COMPLETEDFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0
TP 2: From Week 12 to Week 24STARTEDTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0

Adverse events78

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0480
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA3484
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0480
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0480
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA4486
otherNeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)0480
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0480
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA4485
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)1481
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA0480

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA048
Total, all-cause mortalityTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA048
Total, all-cause mortalityFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)048
Total, other adverse eventsTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA1248
Total, other adverse eventsTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA3548
Total, other adverse eventsFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)2048
Total, serious adverse eventsTP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA048
Total, serious adverse eventsTP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA148
Total, serious adverse eventsFollow-Up (FU) Period-nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)448

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40919077DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
TP 1:JNJ-73763989 200 mg+JNJ-56136379 250 mg+NA vs TP 2:JNJ-3989 200 mg+JNJ-6379 250 mg+PegIFN-alpha2a 180 mcg+NA: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04667104

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04667104/registered?page=2