ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04685538

Chloroprocaine 3% Gel Eye Drop as Topical Anestheticsin Phacoemulsification.

NCT04685538, Phase 3, Completed, Sintetica SA; results first posted 2022-10-27

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Chloroprocaine 3% Gel Eye Drop as Topical Anestheticsin Phacoemulsification. Trials, record NCT04685538. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04685538

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Chloroprocaine 3% Gel Eye Drop as Topical Anestheticsin Phacoemulsification.
NCT number
NCT04685538
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
338 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sintetica SA
Conditions
Cataract
Interventions
Chloroprocaine 3%, Tetracaine 0.5%
First posted
2020-12-28
Last updated
2023-01-18
Results first posted
2022-10-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaBefore Intra Ocular Lens (IOL) implantation surgery.
Τhe primary endpoint is the number of partecipants in each treatment group with a successful surface anesthesia, without any supplementation at the time point T4 (1 minute after the 3rd drop installation)
SecondaryChanges in Ocular SymptomsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Changes in ocular symptoms (pain, irritation/burning/stinging, foreign body sensation) will be graded by the patients according to the following scale (0 is the minimum value and 3 is tha maximum value) (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) during the study on Visit 1-selection and on visit 4-final
SecondaryObjective Ocular SignsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
\- Objective ocular signs assessed by slit lamp examination, flare, and other objective ocular signs will be graded according to the following scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 3
SecondaryFluoresceineVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Modification of the basal status evaluated with fluorescein test Approximately 2-3 minutes following fluorescein instillation, corneal staining was to be evaluated in both eyes, using a slit lamp, based on the Oxford scale (grades of 0-5: 0 is normal, 5 is severe abnormal).
SecondaryEndothelial Cell CountsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the Endothelial cell counts evaluated with the specular microscopy
SecondaryCorneal ThicknessVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment (Corneal thickness). Measurement of the central corneal thickness was to be performed with a pachymeter
SecondaryBest Far Corrected Visual AcuityVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Modification of the basal status of the assesment evaluated by LogMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution). When using a LogMAR chart, visual acuity is scored with reference to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, as the chart's name suggests. An observer who can resolve details as small as 1 minute of visual angle scores LogMAR 0, since the base-10 logarithm of 1 is 0; an observer who can resolve details as small as 2 minutes of visual angle (i.e., reduced acuity) scores LogMAR 0.3, since the base-10 logarithm of 2 is near-approximately 0.3; and so on.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities of the Retina, Macula, or Optic Nerve by FundoscopyVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment. Dilated fundus examination on retina, macula, optic nerve.
SecondaryIntra-ocular PressureVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment. Intraocular pressure (in mmHg) was assessed according to site current practice (air puff or applanation tonometer).
SecondarySurgeon Satisfactionday 1 - visit2 (Inclusion visit/Surgery)
Evaluation of surgeon satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction was assessed through the question "How do you consider the study product global tolerance?", at a scale (a score of 0 is the minimum value with the best outcome and 3 is the maximum value with the worst outcome): (0) Very satisfactory, (1) Satisfactory, (2) Not very satisfactory, (3) Unsatisfactory. It is recorded at V2 and filled in by the surgeon who had performed the study. It is measured at Visit 2.

Outcomes11

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaBefore Intra Ocular Lens (IOL) implantation surgery.participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChanges in Ocular SymptomsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYObjective Ocular SignsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYFluoresceineVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYEndothelial Cell CountsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 dayscell/mm^2MEAN
SECONDARYCorneal ThicknessVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysumMEAN
SECONDARYBest Far Corrected Visual AcuityVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysLogMARMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Abnormalities of the Retina, Macula, or Optic Nerve by FundoscopyVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYIntra-ocular PressureVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysmmHgMEAN
SECONDARYSurgeon Satisfactionday 1 - visit2 (Inclusion visit/Surgery)score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group60

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaChloroprocaine 3%Anesthesia Success153participants
Number of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaTetracaine 0.5%Anesthesia Success152participants
Number of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaChloroprocaine 3%Anesthesia NO Success14participants
Number of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaTetracaine 0.5%Anesthesia NO Success19participants
Changes in Ocular SymptomsChloroprocaine 3%Foreign Body Sensation visit10.08Standard Deviation 0.32score on a scale
Changes in Ocular SymptomsTetracaine 0.5%Foreign Body Sensation visit10.06Standard Deviation 0.33score on a scale
Changes in Ocular SymptomsChloroprocaine 3%Foreign Body Sensation visit40.19Standard Deviation 0.43score on a scale
Changes in Ocular SymptomsTetracaine 0.5%Foreign Body Sensation visit40.17Standard Deviation 0.41score on a scale
Changes in Ocular SymptomsChloroprocaine 3%Irritation/Burning/Stinging visit10.11Standard Deviation 0.33score on a scale
Changes in Ocular SymptomsTetracaine 0.5%Irritation/Burning/Stinging visit10.11Standard Deviation 0.37score on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDChloroprocaine 3%167
Overall StudySTARTEDTetracaine 0.5%171
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChloroprocaine 3%167
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTetracaine 0.5%168
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChloroprocaine 3%0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTetracaine 0.5%3

Adverse events52

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
othercorneal DystrophyCongenital, familial and genetic disordersChloroprocaine 3%01670
othercorneal DystrophyCongenital, familial and genetic disordersTetracaine 0.5%11711
otherConjunctival hemorrhageEye disordersChloroprocaine 3%11671
otherConjunctival hemorrhageEye disordersTetracaine 0.5%01710
othercongiunctivitisEye disordersChloroprocaine 3%01670
othercongiunctivitisEye disordersTetracaine 0.5%11711
othercorneal degenerationEye disordersChloroprocaine 3%01670
othercorneal degenerationEye disordersTetracaine 0.5%11711
othercornela disorderEye disordersChloroprocaine 3%01670
othercornela disorderEye disordersTetracaine 0.5%11711

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityChloroprocaine 3%0167
Total, all-cause mortalityTetracaine 0.5%0171
Total, other adverse eventsChloroprocaine 3%14167
Total, other adverse eventsTetracaine 0.5%19171
Total, serious adverse eventsChloroprocaine 3%0167
Total, serious adverse eventsTetracaine 0.5%0171

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38489057DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Chloroprocaine 3% vs Tetracaine 0.5%: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Chloroprocaine 3% vs Tetracaine 0.5%: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04685538

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04685538/results?page=2