ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04685538

Registered outcomes11

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants in Each Treatment Group With a Successful Surface AnesthesiaBefore Intra Ocular Lens (IOL) implantation surgery.
Τhe primary endpoint is the number of partecipants in each treatment group with a successful surface anesthesia, without any supplementation at the time point T4 (1 minute after the 3rd drop installation)
SecondaryChanges in Ocular SymptomsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Changes in ocular symptoms (pain, irritation/burning/stinging, foreign body sensation) will be graded by the patients according to the following scale (0 is the minimum value and 3 is tha maximum value) (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) during the study on Visit 1-selection and on visit 4-final
SecondaryObjective Ocular SignsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
\- Objective ocular signs assessed by slit lamp examination, flare, and other objective ocular signs will be graded according to the following scale: 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 3
SecondaryFluoresceineVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Modification of the basal status evaluated with fluorescein test Approximately 2-3 minutes following fluorescein instillation, corneal staining was to be evaluated in both eyes, using a slit lamp, based on the Oxford scale (grades of 0-5: 0 is normal, 5 is severe abnormal).
SecondaryEndothelial Cell CountsVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the Endothelial cell counts evaluated with the specular microscopy
SecondaryCorneal ThicknessVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment (Corneal thickness). Measurement of the central corneal thickness was to be performed with a pachymeter
SecondaryBest Far Corrected Visual AcuityVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 days
Modification of the basal status of the assesment evaluated by LogMAR (Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution). When using a LogMAR chart, visual acuity is scored with reference to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, as the chart's name suggests. An observer who can resolve details as small as 1 minute of visual angle scores LogMAR 0, since the base-10 logarithm of 1 is 0; an observer who can resolve details as small as 2 minutes of visual angle (i.e., reduced acuity) scores LogMAR 0.3, since the base-10 logarithm of 2 is near-approximately 0.3; and so on.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities of the Retina, Macula, or Optic Nerve by FundoscopyVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment. Dilated fundus examination on retina, macula, optic nerve.
SecondaryIntra-ocular PressureVisit 1 (Day -90/Day -1) and Visit 4 (Day 8 ± 1 day), up to approximately 102 daysModification of the basal status of the assesment. Intraocular pressure (in mmHg) was assessed according to site current practice (air puff or applanation tonometer).
SecondarySurgeon Satisfactionday 1 - visit2 (Inclusion visit/Surgery)
Evaluation of surgeon satisfaction. Surgeon satisfaction was assessed through the question "How do you consider the study product global tolerance?", at a scale (a score of 0 is the minimum value with the best outcome and 3 is the maximum value with the worst outcome): (0) Very satisfactory, (1) Satisfactory, (2) Not very satisfactory, (3) Unsatisfactory. It is recorded at V2 and filled in by the surgeon who had performed the study. It is measured at Visit 2.
SecondaryPatient Global Satisfactionday 1 - visit2 (Inclusion visit/Surgery) after the treatment
Patient global satisfaction at D1 based on a 5-question questionnaire read by a masked observer. A question read by a masked observer assessed the patient satisfaction about the overall anesthesia during the surgery: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the topical study product used for your local anesthesia during your cataract surgery?" It was measured with 5 possible answers (Likert satisfaction scale): Very satisfied (0), Globally satisfied (1), Neither satisfied nor Unsatisfied (2), Globally unsatisfied (3), Very unsatisfied (4). It was measured at Visit 3.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04685538/registered