ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT04770753

A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT)

NCT04770753, Phase 3, Active not recruiting, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2025-01-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT). Trials, record NCT04770753. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT04770753

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT)
NCT number
NCT04770753
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
194 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Non-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia, Non-Transfusion-dependent Beta-Thalassemia
Interventions
Placebo Matching Mitapivat, Mitapivat
First posted
2021-02-25
Last updated
2026-10-30
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2021-000211-23
Results first posted
2025-01-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineDouble-Blind Period: Baseline up to Week 12 through Week 24
Hb response is defined as ≥10 grams/ liter (g/L) (1.0 gram per deciliter) (g/dL) increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through Week 24 compared with baseline. Hb response was tested using the Mantel-Haenszel stratum weighted method adjusting for randomization stratification factors. Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue Subscale Score From Week 12 Through Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 12 through Week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue subscale includes a 13-item self-reported fatigue subscale, which assesses the severity and impact of fatigue (including the impact on daily activities and functioning).The FACIT-Fatigue subscale is scored on a 5-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The total FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score indicating better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Baseline is defined as the last assessment before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or the last assessment before start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Hb Concentration From Week 12 Through Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 12 through Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hb 1.5+ Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineDouble-Blind Period: Baseline up to Week 12 through Week 24
Hb 1.5+ response is defined as a ≥1.5 g/dL increase in average Hb concentration from Week 12 through Week 24 compared with baseline. Hb 1.5+ response will be summarized using the Mantel-Haenszel stratum weighted method adjusting for randomization stratification factors. Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Erythropoietin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24
Baseline is defined as the average of all assessments within 42 days before randomization for subjects randomized and not dosed or within 42 days before the start of study treatment for subjects randomized and dosed.
SecondaryDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)- Fatigue Response at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Double-Blind Period: At Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24
PGIS-Fatigue measured participants' perception of their fatigue severity (7-day recall) on a 4-point scale ranging from '1=none' to '4=severe'. A participant was considered to have achieved the PGIS-Fatigue response at Weeks 12, 16, 20, or 24, if their baseline to postbaseline score met one of the following conditions: 'none' at baseline to 'none' postbaseline; 'mild' to 'mild' or 'none'; 'moderate' to 'mild' or 'none'; or 'severe' to 'moderate', 'mild', or 'none'.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineDouble-Blind Period: Baseline up to Week 12 through Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue Subscale Score From Week 12 Through Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 12 through Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Hb Concentration From Week 12 Through Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 12 through Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.Gram per Liter (g/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hb 1.5+ Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineDouble-Blind Period: Baseline up to Week 12 through Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.Micromole per Liter (umol/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.Units per Liter (U/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.Gram per Liter (g/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.10^9 cells per liter (10^9 cells/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Erythropoietin at Week 24Double-Blind Period: Baseline, Week 24FAS included all participants who were randomized. Overall number of participants analyzed indicates number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.International units per Liter (IU/L)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYDouble-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)- Fatigue Response at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24Double-Blind Period: At Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24FAS included all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group92

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Double-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineMitapivat42.3Percentage of participants
Double-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hemoglobin (Hb) Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselinePlacebo1.6Percentage of participants
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue Subscale Score From Week 12 Through Week 24Mitapivat4.85Standard Error 0.732score on a scale
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) -Fatigue Subscale Score From Week 12 Through Week 24Placebo1.46Standard Error 0.955score on a scale
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Hb Concentration From Week 12 Through Week 24Mitapivat8.57Standard Error 0.666Gram per Liter (g/L)
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Average Hb Concentration From Week 12 Through Week 24Placebo-1.06Standard Error 0.867Gram per Liter (g/L)
Double-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hb 1.5+ Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselineMitapivat24.6Percentage of participants
Double-Blind Period: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Hb 1.5+ Response From Week 12 Through Week 24 Compared With BaselinePlacebo0Percentage of participants
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin at Week 24Mitapivat-10.65Standard Error 1.047Micromole per Liter (umol/L)
Double-Blind Period: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin at Week 24Placebo-0.03Standard Error 1.403Micromole per Liter (umol/L)

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDMitapivat130
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo64
Overall StudyTreatedMitapivat129
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo63
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDMitapivat122
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo62
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDMitapivat8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2

Adverse events48

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsMitapivat13129
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo463
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsMitapivat8129
otherCOVID-19Infections and infestationsPlacebo563
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsMitapivat5129
otherInfluenzaInfections and infestationsPlacebo663
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersMitapivat15129
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo563
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersMitapivat11129
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo663

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityMitapivat0130
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo064
Total, other adverse eventsMitapivat80129
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3363
Total, serious adverse eventsMitapivat8129
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo063

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
40544857DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Mitapivat vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Mitapivat vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04770753

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT04770753/registered?page=2