ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT05102591

A Pilot Clinical Trial of a New Neuromodulation Device for Acute Attacks of Migraine in Children and Adolescents

NCT05102591, Phase 3, Completed, University of Calgary; results first posted 2025-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Pilot Clinical Trial of a New Neuromodulation Device for Acute Attacks of Migraine in Children and Adolescents. Trials, record NCT05102591. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05102591

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Pilot Clinical Trial of a New Neuromodulation Device for Acute Attacks of Migraine in Children and Adolescents
NCT number
NCT05102591
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
22 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Calgary
Conditions
Migraine Disorders
Interventions
Ketorolac, Metoclopramide, Active Remote Electrical Neuromodulation Device, Placebo, Sham Remote Electrical Neuromodulation Device
First posted
2021-11-01
Last updated
2025-03-12
Results first posted
2025-03-12
Limitations and caveats
Our study was conducted during the COVID19 pandemic, the Fall of 2022 tripledemic, and a shiga-toxin E. Coli outbreak. These events hampered recruitment and our recruitment estimate is likely lower than what we anticipate under 'normal' conditions. Due to delays in the approval process, we had a shorter crossover than the parallel-group phase (9 vs. 15 months). Lastly, 90% of our study participants were White, as such the generalizability of our results is limited.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAssessment of Recruitment RateEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
The primary outcome for this pilot study involves assessment of the feasibility of using the REN device to treat children and adolescents suffering from acute migraine attacks in the ED. The primary feasibility outcome will be determined based on the recruitment rate, defined as the number of participants enrolled per month. Our target is to have an average recruitment rate of 1.5 participants per month. Feasibility will be used as the primary outcome, along with the secondary outcomes, to provide preliminary data to help design and optimize a fully powered, phase III RCT. Recruitment rate for both phases of the study are reported to understand if changing to crossover design improved recruitment. We switched to a crossover design strictly to address participant and recruitment concerns around not receiving standard of care migraine treatment if initially randomized to receive REN treatment and such treatment was unsuccessful.
SecondaryReduction in Pain SeverityDifference between baseline and 1 hour, 2 hours, and 48 hours post-intervention.
Reduction in pain severity between baseline and 1-hour, 2 hours, and 48 hours post-interventions. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain. Headache pain was only assessed at 48 hours if participants indicated they were currently experiencing a headache and the 48 hours reduction in pain severity outcome does not include participants who crossed over and were exposed to both interventions as we expected them to become unblinded after being exposed to both study treatments; Standard of Care (Initial Treatment) n = 7, REN (Initial Treatment) n = 5.
SecondaryNumber of Eligible Participants Who Are Screened, Enrolled, and Complete All AssessmentsEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
This secondary feasibility outcome involves the following: The number of participants who complete all assessments at each time point (baseline, 60, 120 minutes or at discharge if before 120 minutes, and 48-hours; for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable).
SecondaryGlobal Impression of ChangeEvaluated for each participant at 2-hours post-intervention, and 48-hours post-intervention
This acceptability outcome involves the following: * The proportion of participants who report a global impression of change as "very much improved" or "much improved". * Measured on a 7-point Likert scale (Patient Global Impression scale in clinical status; PGI-C) where 1 = "Very much improved", 4 = "No change", and 7 = "Very much worse" * Smaller values indicate improvement of overall change while larger values indicate worsening of overall change.
SecondaryStudy Feedback From Participants and StaffParticipant feedback evaluated at 48 hours post-intervention
This acceptability outcome involves the following: \- Participant feedback regarding study acceptability. Participant feedback measured on 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), where higher values indicate agreement and lower values indicate disagreement. Feedback questions related to study treatments is reported for both treatment groups and combined across treatment groups. Feedback questions related to the research staff and overall study experience is only combined and reported across both groups, rather than being reported for each group separately since these questions don't relate to specific study treatments. Feedback from clinical staff was collected after each participant's enrollment but not analyzed as this feedback was free-form and not collected using a scale.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Pain Freedom2 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who indicated they were pain free 2-hours post-intervention. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Freedom48 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who indicated they were pain free 2-hours post-intervention and again 48-hours post-intervention. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain.
SecondaryNumbers of Participants Reporting a Change in 4-point Pain Severity Scale Between Baseline and 2 Hours Post-intervention2 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who experienced a pain reduction from "severe" or "moderate" severity down to a "mild" or "no pain" severity, or those participants who experienced a pain reduction from "mild" to "no pain" severity between baseline and 2 hours post-intervention. Measured using the 4-point pain severity scale where 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe. Smaller values indicate no/less severe pain and higher values indicate more severe pain.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Relief48 hours post-intervention
Change from baseline "moderate" to "severe pain" to "mild or "no pain", or change from baseline "mild pain" to "no pain" 2 hours post-intervention, which is sustained to 48 hours post-intervention. Measured using the 4-point pain severity scale where 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe. Smaller values indicate no/less severe pain and higher values indicate more severe pain. Participants who reported they did not have a headache between 2 hours and 48 hours post-intervention were not asked to rate their pain severity and were considered to have no headache pain at 48 hours.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse EventsEvaluated from time of intervention to 2 hours and 48 hours post-interventionThe number of participants who reported experiencing adverse events and serious adverse events following intervention

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAssessment of Recruitment RateEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
Number of participants who were screened, deemed eligible, and subsequently enrolled. Three (3) participants during the parallel-group design phase withdrew after consent but before being randomized/receiving study treatments. No other participants withdrew during the study.
participants per monthMEAN
SECONDARYReduction in Pain SeverityDifference between baseline and 1 hour, 2 hours, and 48 hours post-intervention.
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Eligible Participants Who Are Screened, Enrolled, and Complete All AssessmentsEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYGlobal Impression of ChangeEvaluated for each participant at 2-hours post-intervention, and 48-hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYStudy Feedback From Participants and StaffParticipant feedback evaluated at 48 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Reporting Pain Freedom2 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Freedom48 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumbers of Participants Reporting a Change in 4-point Pain Severity Scale Between Baseline and 2 Hours Post-intervention2 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Relief48 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse EventsEvaluated from time of intervention to 2 hours and 48 hours post-intervention
Treatment data are combined across phases, separated based on treatment given and time given to be consistent with how we specified results would be reported in the protocol (i.e., ...for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable). Participants who received SoC IV at crossover received REN initially, and vice versa. No participants received REN crossover treatment as they were well enough to go home after the initial IV treatment (as per protocol).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group89

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Assessment of Recruitment RateParallel-group Design1.1Standard Deviation 1.5participants per month
Assessment of Recruitment RateCrossover Design0.6Standard Deviation 1.0participants per month
Reduction in Pain SeverityStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)1 hour post-intervention2.9Standard Deviation 2.9units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)1 hour post-intervention2.1Standard Deviation 1.3units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityStandard-of-Care IV (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)1 hour post-intervention3Standard Deviation 0units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)2 hours post-intervention4Standard Deviation 3.5units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)2 hours post-intervention2.4Standard Deviation 1.6units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityStandard-of-Care IV (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)2 hours post-intervention3.5Standard Deviation 0.7units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)48 hours post-intervention3.3Standard Deviation 2.7units on a scale
Reduction in Pain SeverityREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)48 hours post-intervention2.6Standard Deviation 1.5units on a scale

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDStandard-of-Care IV Group (Parallel Design Phase)7
Overall StudySTARTEDREN Group (Parallel Design Phase)7
Overall StudySTARTEDStandard-of-Care IV Group First, Then REN Group if Applicable (Crossover Design Phase)3
Overall StudySTARTEDREN Group First, Then Standard-of-Care IV Group First if Applicable (Crossover Design Phase)2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStandard-of-Care IV Group (Parallel Design Phase)7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDREN Group (Parallel Design Phase)7
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStandard-of-Care IV Group First, Then REN Group if Applicable (Crossover Design Phase)3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDREN Group First, Then Standard-of-Care IV Group First if Applicable (Crossover Design Phase)2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStandard-of-Care IV Group (Parallel Design Phase)0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDREN Group (Parallel Design Phase)0

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)1101
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)090
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersStandard-of-Care IV (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)020
otherAkathisiaNervous system disordersREN (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)000

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)010
Total, all-cause mortalityREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)09
Total, all-cause mortalityStandard-of-Care IV (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)02
Total, all-cause mortalityREN (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)00
Total, other adverse eventsStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)110
Total, other adverse eventsREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)09
Total, other adverse eventsStandard-of-Care IV (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)02
Total, other adverse eventsREN (Crossover Treatment; Crossover Phase)00
Total, serious adverse eventsStandard-of-Care IV (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)010
Total, serious adverse eventsREN (Initial Treatment; Parallel and Crossover Phases)09

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
39290050DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05102591

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05102591/results?page=2