ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05102591

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAssessment of Recruitment RateEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
The primary outcome for this pilot study involves assessment of the feasibility of using the REN device to treat children and adolescents suffering from acute migraine attacks in the ED. The primary feasibility outcome will be determined based on the recruitment rate, defined as the number of participants enrolled per month. Our target is to have an average recruitment rate of 1.5 participants per month. Feasibility will be used as the primary outcome, along with the secondary outcomes, to provide preliminary data to help design and optimize a fully powered, phase III RCT. Recruitment rate for both phases of the study are reported to understand if changing to crossover design improved recruitment. We switched to a crossover design strictly to address participant and recruitment concerns around not receiving standard of care migraine treatment if initially randomized to receive REN treatment and such treatment was unsuccessful.
SecondaryReduction in Pain SeverityDifference between baseline and 1 hour, 2 hours, and 48 hours post-intervention.
Reduction in pain severity between baseline and 1-hour, 2 hours, and 48 hours post-interventions. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain. Headache pain was only assessed at 48 hours if participants indicated they were currently experiencing a headache and the 48 hours reduction in pain severity outcome does not include participants who crossed over and were exposed to both interventions as we expected them to become unblinded after being exposed to both study treatments; Standard of Care (Initial Treatment) n = 7, REN (Initial Treatment) n = 5.
SecondaryNumber of Eligible Participants Who Are Screened, Enrolled, and Complete All AssessmentsEvaluated monthly and at the end of recruitment (i.e., 2 years or once the final participant has completed the study)
This secondary feasibility outcome involves the following: The number of participants who complete all assessments at each time point (baseline, 60, 120 minutes or at discharge if before 120 minutes, and 48-hours; for both the initial assigned intervention and the crossover intervention where applicable).
SecondaryGlobal Impression of ChangeEvaluated for each participant at 2-hours post-intervention, and 48-hours post-intervention
This acceptability outcome involves the following: * The proportion of participants who report a global impression of change as "very much improved" or "much improved". * Measured on a 7-point Likert scale (Patient Global Impression scale in clinical status; PGI-C) where 1 = "Very much improved", 4 = "No change", and 7 = "Very much worse" * Smaller values indicate improvement of overall change while larger values indicate worsening of overall change.
SecondaryStudy Feedback From Participants and StaffParticipant feedback evaluated at 48 hours post-intervention
This acceptability outcome involves the following: \- Participant feedback regarding study acceptability. Participant feedback measured on 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree), where higher values indicate agreement and lower values indicate disagreement. Feedback questions related to study treatments is reported for both treatment groups and combined across treatment groups. Feedback questions related to the research staff and overall study experience is only combined and reported across both groups, rather than being reported for each group separately since these questions don't relate to specific study treatments. Feedback from clinical staff was collected after each participant's enrollment but not analyzed as this feedback was free-form and not collected using a scale.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Pain Freedom2 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who indicated they were pain free 2-hours post-intervention. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Freedom48 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who indicated they were pain free 2-hours post-intervention and again 48-hours post-intervention. Pain measured on an 11-point Likert scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain possible, with lower values indicating no/less pain and higher values indicating more pain.
SecondaryNumbers of Participants Reporting a Change in 4-point Pain Severity Scale Between Baseline and 2 Hours Post-intervention2 hours post-intervention
Number of participants who experienced a pain reduction from "severe" or "moderate" severity down to a "mild" or "no pain" severity, or those participants who experienced a pain reduction from "mild" to "no pain" severity between baseline and 2 hours post-intervention. Measured using the 4-point pain severity scale where 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe. Smaller values indicate no/less severe pain and higher values indicate more severe pain.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Sustained Pain Relief48 hours post-intervention
Change from baseline "moderate" to "severe pain" to "mild or "no pain", or change from baseline "mild pain" to "no pain" 2 hours post-intervention, which is sustained to 48 hours post-intervention. Measured using the 4-point pain severity scale where 0 = None, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe. Smaller values indicate no/less severe pain and higher values indicate more severe pain. Participants who reported they did not have a headache between 2 hours and 48 hours post-intervention were not asked to rate their pain severity and were considered to have no headache pain at 48 hours.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Adverse EventsEvaluated from time of intervention to 2 hours and 48 hours post-interventionThe number of participants who reported experiencing adverse events and serious adverse events following intervention
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Freedom From Most Bothersome Symptom2 hours post-interventionThe number of participants who experienced freedom from their most bothersome symptom (nausea, vomiting, sensitivity to light, or sensitivity to sound).
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discharged From the Emergency Department With no Further Intervention2 hours post-intervention (after last intervention, following ED discharge)The number of participants discharged from the emergency department with no further intervention other than study intervention

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05102591/registered