ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trials

User-Led Meaningful Activity and Early-Stage Dementia

NCT05159869, Not applicable, Completed, Johns Hopkins University; results first posted 2026-01-12

Trial 11

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

FieldValueSource
TitleUser-Led Meaningful Activity and Early-Stage DementiaClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT05159869ClinicalTrials.gov
StatusCompletedClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesNot applicableClinicalTrials.gov
Enrollment61 participants, actualClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsDementiaClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsUser-Led Meaningful Activity PlanClinicalTrials.gov
First posted2021-12-16ClinicalTrials.gov
Last updated2026-01-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2026-01-12ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes 26

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescriptionSource
PrimaryChange in Global Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-IIIBaseline and 4 months
Global cognitive function will be measured by the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III) information/orientation subtest, which assesses general personal information and orientation to person, place, and time. Scores range from 0-14, with higher scores indicating more intact global cognitive function. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Attention as Assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span TestBaseline and 4 months
Attention will be assessed via the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV) digit span subtest total score, obtained by adding up the total score on Digit Span Forward, Digit Span Backward, and Digit Span Sequencing. For all 3 tests, range = 0-16, with higher scores indicating better attention. Total raw score range = 0-48. Every series on each digit span subtest consists of two trials, each of which is scored 1 or 0 points. Testing is discontinued when a zero is obtained on both trials of an item. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Processing Speed as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part ABaseline and 4 months
Processing speed will be assessed via the Trail-Making Test Part A. Participants must draw lines connecting 25 numbered circles in sequential order within a maximum time of 150 seconds. The raw completion time in seconds is converted to age-normed T-scores to facilitate standardized interpretation. Lower T-scores indicate slower processing speed, whereas higher T-scores indicate faster processing speed. Regarding clinically relevant thresholds, T-scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A T-score below 40 (i.e., 1 SD below the mean) may suggest mild impairment in processing speed. T-scores below 30 (i.e., 2 SDs below the mean) may reflect substantial processing speed dysfunction. T-scores above 60 reflect performance that is above average for the individual's normative peer group. The outcome is measured as a change in T-score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part BBaseline and 4 months
Executive function will be assessed via the Trail-Making Test Part B. Participants must draw lines connecting 13 numbered circles alternately with 12 letters of the alphabet, all in ascending order within a maximum time of 300 seconds. The raw completion time in seconds is converted to age-normed T-scores. Lower T-scores indicate potential deficits in executive function, and higher T-scores indicate more intact executive function. For clinically relevant thresholds, T-scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A T-score below 40 (i.e., 1 SD below the mean) may suggest mild executive dysfunction. T-scores below 30 (i.e., 2 SDs below the mean) may reflect substantial executive dysfunction. T-scores above 60 reflect above average executive function for the individual's normative peer group. The outcome is measured as a change in T-score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Stroop Color-Word TestBaseline and 4 months
Executive function will be assessed via the Stroop Color-Word Test, a 100-item word-color page where word meanings and ink colors are mismatched (score range = 0-100). The participant must name as many correct ink colors as possible within a time limit of 45 seconds. The number of items correctly named is the raw score, which is converted to a T-score based on normative data, with higher T-scores indicating better executive function. For clinically relevant thresholds, T-scores are standardized scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A T-score below 40 (i.e., 1 SD below the mean) suggests mild executive dysfunction. T-scores below 30 (i.e., 2 SDs below the mean) suggests substantial executive dysfunction. T-scores above 60 reflect above average executive function for the individual's normative peer group. The outcome is measured as a change in T-score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Clock Drawing Test (CLOX1)Baseline and 4 months
Executive function will be assessed via the Clock Drawing Test Part 1 (CLOX 1). Participants will be asked to draw a clock, put in all the numbers, and set the hands to a specific time. The results will be scored using the CLOX method, which specifically evaluates executive function. CLOX1 scores range from 0-15. Lower scores reflect greater impairment. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Learning SubtestBaseline and 4 months
Immediate memory and new learning will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) subtest of List Learning. In list learning, 10 semantically unrelated words are orally presented to the subject at a two-second rate. The subject is asked to repeat as many words as possible after each of four learning trials. A higher number of words recalled (range 0-40) indicate more intact immediate memory. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domains of Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestBaseline and 4 months
Memory and new learning will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) subtest Story Memory. Story Memory is a twelve-item short story presented over two trials (score range: 0-24). The story is read aloud at a slow reading speed. After each presentation, the subject is asked to recall as much of the story as he or she can remember, with more items recalled indicating more intact immediate memory. A verbatim criterion is used. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recall SubtestBaseline and 4 months
Delayed memory will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) subtest of List Recall. List Recall requires the participant to remember as many words (range 0-10) from the list learning test as possible after a delay, with a higher number of words recalled indicating more intact delayed recall. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recognition SubtestBaseline and 4 months
Delayed memory will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) subtest of List Recognition. After the List Learning and List Recall tasks (immediate and delayed), the participant is presented with a series of yes/no recognition trials including target words from the original list and foils. One point is awarded for each correct yes/no answer (range = 0-20), with a higher number of words recognized indicating more intact delayed recall. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestBaseline and 4 months
Delayed memory will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) subtest of Story Recall. In Story Recall, participants are asked to recall as many specific details as possible from the story learned in the story memory subtest, with more details indicating more intact delayed recall. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Visual Memory as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 months
Immediate visual (non-verbal) memory will be assessed via the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) test. Participants will first copy a complex geometric figure and then immediately reproduce it from memory. Scoring of drawings is based on the widely used 36-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating more intact immediate visual memory. Each of the 18 scoring units is scored based on accuracy and placement criteria. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Visual Memory as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 months
Delayed visual (non-verbal) memory will be assessed via the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) test. Participants are asked to draw all the elements of the figure from the initial figure copy that he or she can recall without visual display of the figure. Scoring of drawings is based on the widely used 0-36-point scoring system (score range), with higher scores indicating more intact delayed visual memory. Each of the 18 scoring units is scored based on accuracy and placement criteria. Raw scores are converted to a scaled score and percentile rank based on normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Controlled Oral Word Association TestBaseline and 4 months
Language, specifically verbal fluency, will be assessed via the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA) test. Participants are asked to come up with as many words as possible that begin with a given letter within a one-minute time period. Participants are also instructed to exclude proper nouns, numbers, and the same word with a different suffix. Score range 0-36. The number of correct responses is totaled, with higher numbers indicating greater verbal fluency, and the sum compared with normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Boston Naming TestBaseline and 4 months
Language will be assessed via the Boston Naming Test (BNT). Participants are asked to name 60 line drawings of objects of graded difficulty, ranging from very common objects to less familiar ones. Objects must be spontaneously named within a 20-second period. If time limit expires, two kinds of prompting cues (one phonemic, one semantic) may be given. Rules allow for discontinuation and for starting the test at an advanced level, thus saving considerable time for subjects without obvious impairment. The examiner will then total the number of spontaneously produced correct responses, the number of cues given, and the number of responses after phonemic cuing and after semantic cuing. Score range 0-60. A higher number of correct spontaneous responses indicates more intact language skills. Scores will be compared to normative data. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a positive mean indicates an improvement in the group mean.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Semantic FluencyBaseline and 4 months
Language will be assessed via the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) semantic fluency subtest. This test involves the generation of as many unique examples as possible from a given semantic category within 60 seconds. Raw scores typically range from 0 to approximately 30-40, depending on age and clinical status, with higher scores indicating better performance (i.e., greater language fluency and semantic access). The outcome is reported as a change in group mean T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), where the raw score is defined as the total number of valid, non-redundant examples generated on the RBANS Semantic Fluency subtest. A positive value indicates improved semantic fluency.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Visuospatial Constructional Ability as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 months
Visuospatial constructional ability is assessed using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF) test, a neuropsychological task in which participants reproduce a complex geometric figure. Scoring uses the standard 36-point system, in which 18 components are rated for accuracy and placement (0-2 points each). The total raw score ranges from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating better performance. The outcome is reported as a change in mean raw score from baseline (T1) to 4 months (T2). A positive change score reflects improvement in visuospatial constructional ability.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Frequency x Severity of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Persons With Dementia as Assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)Baseline and 4 months
Frequency and severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms are measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) as reported by the primary caregiver. The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as 1 = occasionally, 2 = often, 3 = frequently, 4 = very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as 1= mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = marked. The total score is calculated as a sum of all 12 domain scores and thus ranges from 12 to 144, with a higher score indicating worsening symptoms. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a negative mean indicates an improvement in frequency x severity of symptoms.
ClinicalTrials.gov
PrimaryChange in the Cognitive Domain of Visuospatial Ability as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Line OrientationBaseline and 4 months
Visuospatial ability is assessed using the Line Orientation subtest of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). In this task, participants are asked to match two angled lines to corresponding lines from a semicircular fan of 13 lines. The test includes 10 trials, and each correct match is awarded 2 points, for a total raw score range of 0 to 20. Higher scores indicate better visuospatial performance. The outcome is reported as a change in mean raw score from baseline (T1) to 4 months (T2). A positive score reflects improved visuospatial ability.
ClinicalTrials.gov
SecondaryChange in Depression as Assessed by the Geriatric Depression ScaleBaseline and 4 months
Depression in persons with dementia will be measured by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15). The GDS-15 is a 15-item self-report scale tested and used extensively with older adults. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal, while scores of 5-8 signify mild depression, 9-11 signify moderate depression, and 12-15 indicate severe depression. The outcome is measured as a change score, calculated as T2 (4 months) - T1 (baseline), whereby a negative mean indicates an improvement in depressive symptoms.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcomes 26

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured asSource
PRIMARYChange in Global Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-IIIBaseline and 4 monthsscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Attention as Assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span TestBaseline and 4 monthsscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Processing Speed as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part ABaseline and 4 monthsT-scoreMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part BBaseline and 4 monthsT-scoreMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Stroop Color-Word TestBaseline and 4 monthsT-scoreMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Clock Drawing Test (CLOX1)Baseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Learning SubtestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domains of Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recall SubtestBaseline and 4 monthsParticipants with data collectedunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recognition SubtestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Visual Memory as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Visual Memory as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Controlled Oral Word Association TestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Boston Naming TestBaseline and 4 monthsunits on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Language as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Semantic FluencyBaseline and 4 monthsexamplesMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Visuospatial Constructional Ability as Assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure TestBaseline and 4 monthspointsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Frequency x Severity of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Persons With Dementia as Assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)Baseline and 4 monthsscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov
PRIMARYChange in the Cognitive Domain of Visuospatial Ability as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Line OrientationBaseline and 4 monthspointsMEANClinicalTrials.gov
SECONDARYChange in Depression as Assessed by the Geriatric Depression ScaleBaseline and 4 monthsscore on a scaleMEANClinicalTrials.gov

Results by group 52

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnitsSource
Change in Global Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-IIIExperimental-0.2Standard Deviation 0.8score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in Global Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-IIIWait-List Control-0.2Standard Deviation 0.9score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Attention as Assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span TestExperimental0.6Standard Error 0.3score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Attention as Assessed by the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV Digit Span TestWait-List Control-0.2Standard Error 0.3score on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Processing Speed as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part AExperimental2.6Standard Deviation 6.4T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Processing Speed as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part AWait-List Control-0.2Standard Deviation 6.7T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part BExperimental2.7Standard Deviation 7.6T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Trail-Making Test Part BWait-List Control-0.6Standard Deviation 7.2T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Stroop Color-Word TestExperimental1.1Standard Deviation 6.9T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Stroop Color-Word TestWait-List Control0.4Standard Deviation 5.8T-scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Clock Drawing Test (CLOX1)Experimental1.3Standard Deviation 1.9units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Executive Function as Assessed by the Clock Drawing Test (CLOX1)Wait-List Control0.2Standard Deviation 2.2units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Learning SubtestExperimental2.7Standard Deviation 4.6units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Immediate Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Learning SubtestWait-List Control0.1Standard Deviation 4.4units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domains of Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestExperimental1.8Standard Deviation 3.4units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domains of Memory and Learning as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Story Memory SubtestWait-List Control0.3Standard Deviation 3.2units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recall SubtestExperimental1.2Standard Deviation 2.0units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recall SubtestWait-List Control0.2Standard Deviation 2.1units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recognition SubtestExperimental1.1Standard Deviation 2.3units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov
Change in the Cognitive Domain of Delayed Memory as Assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status List Recognition SubtestWait-List Control0.2Standard Deviation 2.3units on a scaleClinicalTrials.gov

Participant flow 10

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits countedSource
Overall StudySTARTEDExperimental Group - Individuals With Dementia31ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudySTARTEDWait-List Control Group - Individuals With Dementia30ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCaregivers (Not Enrolled)Experimental Group - Individuals With Dementia31ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCaregivers (Not Enrolled)Wait-List Control Group - Individuals With Dementia30ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyIndividuals With DementiaExperimental Group - Individuals With Dementia31ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyIndividuals With DementiaWait-List Control Group - Individuals With Dementia30ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExperimental Group - Individuals With Dementia31ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDWait-List Control Group - Individuals With Dementia30ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDExperimental Group - Individuals With Dementia0ClinicalTrials.gov
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDWait-List Control Group - Individuals With Dementia0ClinicalTrials.gov

Adverse events 0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEventsSource

Adverse event totals 6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt riskSource
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental031ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, all-cause mortalityWait-List Control030ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental031ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, other adverse eventsWait-List Control030ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental031ClinicalTrials.gov
Total, serious adverse eventsWait-List Control030ClinicalTrials.gov

Papers 4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
20579167BACKGROUNDPubMed
20699725BACKGROUNDPubMed
27986794BACKGROUNDPubMed
28332736BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants 0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal yearsSource

Trial comparisons 2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Experimental vs Wait-List Control: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Experimental vs Wait-List Control: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests 10

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed asSource
Category FluencyPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Clock Drawing TaskPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Complex Figure Copy and RecallPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Digit Span TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Picture Naming TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Short Story RecallPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Stroop Color-Word TestPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test APrimary outcomeConductCognition
Trail Making Test BPrimary outcomeConductCognition
Verbal FluencyPrimary outcomeConductCognition

Source 5

FieldValueSource
Releasetrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-2560f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry capture2026-11-12ClinicalTrials.gov
Results copy, AACT2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
NIH clinical studies file2026-11-13ClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project files: Public domain (NIH RePORTER)