ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05664074

Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac

NCT05664074, Phase 4, Completed, David Vitale MD; results first posted 2026-03-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac. Trials, record NCT05664074. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT05664074

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Rectal Indomethacin vs Intravenous Ketorolac
NCT number
NCT05664074
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
192 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
David Vitale MD
Conditions
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Interventions
Rectal indomethacin, IV ketorolac
First posted
2022-12-23
Last updated
2026-03-12
Results first posted
2026-03-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis2 weeks
Below is the number of participants within the rectal indomethacin and IV ketorolac cohorts who developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis- Post ERCP Pancreatitis: A patient must have at least 2 of the following to establish a diagnosis of post ERCP pancreatitis: 1. Characteristic physical exam findings- pain worse than admission per pain scales (please see point 2) and/or nausea 2. Amylase (unit/L) or lipase(unit/L) greater than 3 times the age appropriate upper limit of normal. * Normal range of amylase (15-127 unit/L) * Normal range of lipase (12-50 unit/L) 3. Confirmatory imaging (Ultrasound, CT or MRI) that suggests or demonstrates pancreatic inflammation
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct Injections2 weeks
86 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 83 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic duct injections during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic duct injections.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native Papilla2 weeks
36 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 33 from IV ketorolac had a native papilla for their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who had a native papilla.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Sphincterotomy2 weeks
25 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 19 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic sphincterotomies during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic sphincterotomies.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Opti-Ray Amount2 weeks
83 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 84 from IV ketorolac received various amounts of Opti-Ray during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received Opti-Ray.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Therapeutic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeks
51 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 53 from IV ketorolac received a therapeutic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received therapeutic pancreatic duct stents.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeks
11 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 11 from IV ketorolac received a prophylactic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received prophylactic pancreatic duct stents.
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: PACU2 weeks
A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Evening2 weeks
Not all patients were admitted following the procedure which accounts for the difference in overall number of participants analyzed. A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Morning2 weeks
Not all patients were admitted following the procedure which accounts for the difference in overall number of participants analyzed. A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct Injections2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native Papilla2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Sphincterotomy2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Opti-Ray Amount2 weeksAmount of Opti-Ray used on patients who developed Post-ERCP pancreatitismLMEDIAN
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Therapeutic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: PACU2 weeksNumber of participants below is the number that experienced any pain (pain score \>0) in the PACUParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Evening2 weeks
Number of participants below is the number that experienced any pain (pain score \>0) the evening following the procedure. There is a discrepancy in total participant number due to the fact that not all patients were admitted post-op.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Morning2 weeks
Number of participants below is the number that experienced any pain (pain score \>0) the morning (POD1) following the procedure. There is a discrepancy in total participant number due to the fact that not all patients were admitted post-op.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group44

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Post-ERCP PancreatitisRectal Indomethacin15Participants
Post-ERCP PancreatitisIV Ketorolac21Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct InjectionsRectal IndomethacinPost-ERCP Pancreatitis14Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct InjectionsIV KetorolacPost-ERCP Pancreatitis19Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct InjectionsRectal IndomethacinNo Post-ERCP Pancreatitis72Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct InjectionsIV KetorolacNo Post-ERCP Pancreatitis64Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native PapillaRectal IndomethacinPost-ERCP Pancreatitis11Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native PapillaIV KetorolacPost-ERCP Pancreatitis15Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native PapillaRectal IndomethacinNo Post-ERCP Pancreatitis25Participants
Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native PapillaIV KetorolacNo Post-ERCP Pancreatitis18Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRectal Indomethacin96
Overall StudySTARTEDIV Ketorolac96
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRectal Indomethacin96
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIV Ketorolac96
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRectal Indomethacin0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIV Ketorolac0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRectal Indomethacin096
Total, all-cause mortalityIV Ketorolac096
Total, other adverse eventsRectal Indomethacin096
Total, other adverse eventsIV Ketorolac096
Total, serious adverse eventsRectal Indomethacin096
Total, serious adverse eventsIV Ketorolac096

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: Post-ERCP PancreatitisTrial comparisons
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: MorningTrial comparisons
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: EveningTrial comparisons
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: Pain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: PACUTrial comparisons
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Rectal Indomethacin vs IV Ketorolac: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05664074

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05664074/results?page=2