ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT05664074

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis2 weeks
Below is the number of participants within the rectal indomethacin and IV ketorolac cohorts who developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis- Post ERCP Pancreatitis: A patient must have at least 2 of the following to establish a diagnosis of post ERCP pancreatitis: 1. Characteristic physical exam findings- pain worse than admission per pain scales (please see point 2) and/or nausea 2. Amylase (unit/L) or lipase(unit/L) greater than 3 times the age appropriate upper limit of normal. * Normal range of amylase (15-127 unit/L) * Normal range of lipase (12-50 unit/L) 3. Confirmatory imaging (Ultrasound, CT or MRI) that suggests or demonstrates pancreatic inflammation
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Duct Injections2 weeks
86 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 83 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic duct injections during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic duct injections.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Native Papilla2 weeks
36 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 33 from IV ketorolac had a native papilla for their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who had a native papilla.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Pancreatic Sphincterotomy2 weeks
25 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 19 from IV ketorolac received pancreatic sphincterotomies during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received pancreatic sphincterotomies.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Opti-Ray Amount2 weeks
83 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 84 from IV ketorolac received various amounts of Opti-Ray during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received Opti-Ray.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Therapeutic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeks
51 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 53 from IV ketorolac received a therapeutic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received therapeutic pancreatic duct stents.
PrimaryPost-ERCP Pancreatitis: Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placed2 weeks
11 participants from the rectal indomethacin cohort and 11 from IV ketorolac received a prophylactic pancreatic duct stent during their ERCP. Below we describe the outcome measure of post-ERCP pancreatitis vs. no pancreatitis for those who received prophylactic pancreatic duct stents.
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: PACU2 weeks
A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Evening2 weeks
Not all patients were admitted following the procedure which accounts for the difference in overall number of participants analyzed. A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10
SecondaryPain Assessed by FLACC or NRS Scoring Post ERCP: Morning2 weeks
Not all patients were admitted following the procedure which accounts for the difference in overall number of participants analyzed. A minimum of 3 pain assessments were completed by nursing staff/anesthesia during admission: Anesthesia/ PACU- initial pain assessment Evening-2100- pain assessment by RN Morning -0800- pain assessment by RN We defined \*Pain score \> 0 (any pain) for patients in the rectal indomethacin vs. IV ketorolac cohorts using the NRS and FLACC Pain scale. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain scale for patients 0-5 years of age and patients unable to verbalize pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain scale for patients 6 years old and above 1. Mild- 0 to 3 2. Moderate- 4 to 6 3. Severe- 7 to 10
SecondaryLaboratory Markers Associated With PEP ( Lipase)2 weeksLipase (unit/L)
SecondaryLaboratory Markers Associated With PEP (Amylase)2 weeksAmylase value in unit/L
SecondaryLength of Stay2 weeks
Below is the median length of stay for participants within the rectal indomethacin and IV ketorolac cohorts. The difference in participants analyzed is due to the fact that not all participants were admitted following the procedure.
SecondarySeverity of Pancreatitis (Mild, Moderately Severe, Severe)2 weeks
Severity of AP will be classified as mild, moderately severe, or severe in accordance with the NASPGHAN Classification system. 1. Mild: "AP that is not associated with any organ failure, local or systemic complications, and usually resolves within the first week after presentation." 2. Moderately Severe: "AP with either the development of transient organ failure/dysfunction (lasting no \>48 hours) or development of local or systemic complications. Local complications would include development of (peri) or pancreatic complications including fluid collections or necrosis. Systemic complications would include exacerbation of previously diagnosed co-morbid disease (such as lung disease or kidney disease)." 3. Severe: "AP with development of organ dysfunction per International pediatric sepsis consensus conference (please see definition 9) that persists \>48 hours. Persistent organ failure may be single or multiple, and may develop beyond the first 48 hours of presentation."

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT05664074/registered