ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06027593

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Secondary28-day Acute Otitis Media-related Outpatient Revisits (Emergency Department, Urgent Care, or Primary Care)28 days
Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with a return visit in the outpatient setting (emergency department, urgent care, or primary care) for pediatric acute otitis media within 28 days of the index acute otitis media encounter. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with a return visit in the outpatient setting was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media to generate the percentage of participants with a return visit in the outpatient setting.
Secondary28-day Mastoiditis or Intracranial Infection Admissions28 days
Count of participants with a readmission for mastoiditis or intracranial infection within 28 days of the index encounter for pediatric acute otitis media. The count of participants with a readmission for mastoiditis or intracranial infection was divided by the total number of participants with pediatric acute otitis media to generate the percentage of participants with readmissions within 28 days of discharge following an index hospitalization for acute otitis media.
SecondaryGuideline-concordant Decision to Not Prescribe Antibiotics for Pediatric Acute Otitis MediaPre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years
Count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics. The count of participants with pediatric acute otitis media with an appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics was divided by the total number of participants with no antibiotics prescribed to generate the percentage of participants appropriately not prescribed antibiotics for acute otitis media. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.
SecondaryGuideline-concordant Decision to Not Prescribe Antibiotics for Adult PharyngitisPre-intervention and post-intervention, up to 2 years
Count of participants with adult pharyngitis with guideline-concordant antibiotic use for appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics. The count of participants with adult pharyngitis with an appropriate decision not to prescribe antibiotics was divided by the total number of participants with no antibiotics prescribed to generate the percentage of participants appropriately not prescribed antibiotics for pharyngitis. These proportions were compared for the group of participants in the pre intervention period (1 year) and the post intervention period (1 year). There were not individual participant level measures for this outcome.
OtherFeasibility of Intervention - OutpatientOne time measure in the post intervention time period
Feasibility is defined as the extent to which the intervention can be carried out in the clinical setting. The feasibility of intervention measure is the full name of this scale. The feasibility of intervention scale consists of four questions, each with 5 possible responses (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, or completely agree) on a numeric 1-5 scale. These four subscores are summed to generate a total score, with possible scores ranging from 4-20. A higher score indicates that the intervention is more feasible. There are no validated cutoffs for feasibility. The mean total score and standard deviation of the mean total score for all respondents are reported. The feasibility of intervention measure was assessed by a one time survey in the post-intervention time period.
OtherAcceptability of Intervention - OutpatientOne time measure in the post intervention time period
Acceptability is defined as how well the intervention was received by the prescribing clinicians. The acceptability of intervention measure is the full name of this scale. The acceptability of intervention scale consists of four questions, each with 5 possible responses (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, or completely agree) on a numeric 1-5 scale. These four subscores are summed to generate a total score, with possible scores ranging from 4-20. A higher score indicates that the intervention is more acceptable. There are no validated cutoffs for acceptability. The mean total score and standard deviation of the mean total score for all respondents are reported. The acceptability of intervention measure was assessed by a one time survey in the post-intervention time period.
OtherFeasibility of Intervention Measure - InpatientOne time measure in the post intervention time period
Feasibility is defined as the extent to which the intervention can be carried out in the clinical setting. The feasibility of intervention measure is the full name of this scale. The feasibility of intervention scale consists of four questions, each with 5 possible responses (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, or completely agree) on a numeric 1-5 scale. These four subscores are summed to generate a total score, with possible scores ranging from 4-20. A higher score indicates that the intervention is more feasible. There are no validated cutoffs for feasibility. The mean total score and standard deviation of the mean total score for all respondents are reported. The feasibility of intervention measure was assessed by a one time survey in the post-intervention time period.
OtherAcceptability of Intervention Measure - InpatientOne time measure in the post intervention time period.
Acceptability is defined as how well the intervention was received by the prescribing clinicians. The acceptability of intervention measure is the full name of this scale. The acceptability of intervention scale consists of four questions, each with 5 possible responses (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, or completely agree) on a numeric 1-5 scale. These four subscores are summed to generate a total score, with possible scores ranging from 4-20. A higher score indicates that the intervention is more acceptable. There are no validated cutoffs for acceptability. The mean total score and standard deviation of the mean total score for all respondents are reported. The acceptability of intervention measure was assessed by a one time survey in the post-intervention time period.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06027593/registered?page=2