ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06516094

Efficacy and Safety in the Combination of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B for Low Back Chronic Pain

NCT06516094, Phase 3, Completed, Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety in the Combination of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B for Low Back Chronic Pain. Trials, record NCT06516094. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT06516094

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety in the Combination of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B for Low Back Chronic Pain
NCT number
NCT06516094
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
192 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Laboratorios Silanes S.A. de C.V.
Conditions
Chronic Low-back Pain
Interventions
Celecoxib+Pregabalin+Vitamin B fixed dose, Celecoxib + Vitamin B fixed dose, Pregabalin + Vitamin B fixed dose
First posted
2024-07-23
Last updated
2025-04-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Comparison of the percentage change of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B Combination versus Celecoxib + Vitamin B versus Pregabalin + Vitamin B in the management of chronic low back pain through the visual analog pain scale (VAS).
3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups.
PrimaryNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record.3 months
To describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher.
SecondaryTo describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 months
A general description of sex, age, race, weight, height and BMI. * Body weight: should be obtained on a scale, with the patient without shoes, in a standing position it would be recorded in kilograms. * Height: must be obtained with a stadimeter, with the patient without shoes, in a standing position, the record will be in meters Height will be measured only at visit 0, and will be taken as a reference for measurement of BMI. * BMI: calculated with the formula: Weight/height2 and will be recorded in kg/m2. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
SecondaryAssess the proportion of patients who reported >30% improvement in pain intensity measured through VAS at 12 weeks per treatment group3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups.
SecondaryAssess the proportion of patients who reported >50% improvement in pain intensity measured through VAS at 12 weeks per treatment group3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>50% will be reported and compared between treatment groups.
SecondaryAssess at what time of follow-up the greatest reduction in pain intensity was achieved, measured through VAS, per treatment group.3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess time of greatest reduction in pain intensity.
SecondaryAssess and compare the degree of physical disability due to low back pain, measured through the Oswestry disability questionnaire at 4 and 12 weeks per treatment group.3 months
The Oswestry questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life of patients, it classifies QOL as: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability and completely disabled. The disability degree would be compared.
SecondaryAssess and compare the degree of disability to perform daily activities due to low back pain, reported through Roland-Morris questionnaire at 4 and 12 weeks per group treatment3 months
The Roland-Morris questionnaire has been designed to assess the activities of daily living functional mobility pain. A maximum score of 24 indicates the greatest degree of disability from pain. The disability degree would be compared.
SecondaryAssess and compare health status through the 5-level, 5-dimensions EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 12 weeks from baseline in each group of treatment3 months
The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can image' and 'The worst health you can image'.
SecondaryReport the number of patients that required dose escalation3 months
Dose escalation criteria: 1. Increase in VAS values compared to the previous visit. 2. Use of rescue medication at least in three consecutive occasions. 3. Percentage of adherence to treatment ≥ 80% The researcher will assess the need for dose escalation or not in each visit.

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers11

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
21083513RESULTPubMed
22135737BACKGROUNDPubMed
22231424RESULTPubMed
22299823BACKGROUNDPubMed
22336956RESULTPubMed
27209166RESULTPubMed
27713336RESULTPubMed
28860855RESULTPubMed
29126136RESULTPubMed
30288088RESULTPubMed

1 to 10 of 11

See all 11 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06516094

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06516094/registered