ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT06516094

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Comparison of the percentage change of Celecoxib / Pregabalin / Vitamin B Combination versus Celecoxib + Vitamin B versus Pregabalin + Vitamin B in the management of chronic low back pain through the visual analog pain scale (VAS).
3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups.
PrimaryNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record.3 months
To describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher.
SecondaryTo describe the sociodemographic characteristics of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 months
A general description of sex, age, race, weight, height and BMI. * Body weight: should be obtained on a scale, with the patient without shoes, in a standing position it would be recorded in kilograms. * Height: must be obtained with a stadimeter, with the patient without shoes, in a standing position, the record will be in meters Height will be measured only at visit 0, and will be taken as a reference for measurement of BMI. * BMI: calculated with the formula: Weight/height2 and will be recorded in kg/m2. Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
SecondaryAssess the proportion of patients who reported >30% improvement in pain intensity measured through VAS at 12 weeks per treatment group3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups.
SecondaryAssess the proportion of patients who reported >50% improvement in pain intensity measured through VAS at 12 weeks per treatment group3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain \>50% will be reported and compared between treatment groups.
SecondaryAssess at what time of follow-up the greatest reduction in pain intensity was achieved, measured through VAS, per treatment group.3 months
The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess time of greatest reduction in pain intensity.
SecondaryAssess and compare the degree of physical disability due to low back pain, measured through the Oswestry disability questionnaire at 4 and 12 weeks per treatment group.3 months
The Oswestry questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life of patients, it classifies QOL as: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability and completely disabled. The disability degree would be compared.
SecondaryAssess and compare the degree of disability to perform daily activities due to low back pain, reported through Roland-Morris questionnaire at 4 and 12 weeks per group treatment3 months
The Roland-Morris questionnaire has been designed to assess the activities of daily living functional mobility pain. A maximum score of 24 indicates the greatest degree of disability from pain. The disability degree would be compared.
SecondaryAssess and compare health status through the 5-level, 5-dimensions EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) at 12 weeks from baseline in each group of treatment3 months
The EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can image' and 'The worst health you can image'.
SecondaryReport the number of patients that required dose escalation3 months
Dose escalation criteria: 1. Increase in VAS values compared to the previous visit. 2. Use of rescue medication at least in three consecutive occasions. 3. Percentage of adherence to treatment ≥ 80% The researcher will assess the need for dose escalation or not in each visit.
SecondaryReport the number of patients who require the use of rescue medication during the clinical trial by treatment group.3 months
The rescue medication will be tramadol 50 mg: \- The patient that considers the need for rescue medication must call the doctor, who will be in charge of applying the VAS scale by telephone. If the doctor considers it necessary, the taking of the rescue medication will be indicated.
SecondaryReport the number of patients who presented therapeutic failure during the study among the treatment groups3 months
Therapeutic failure will be defined by the principal researcher previous medical consult, the following criteria must be present: * Increase in the parameters of the VAS scale at 12 weeks from baseline * ≥80% to adherence to treatment * The consumption of at least 2 doses of the designated group treatment * The need of use of the rescue medication during 24 consecutive hours * The absence of comorbidities that could increase the pain (knew traumatism during the clinical trial)
SecondaryTo report the percentage of therapeutic adherence at 12 weeks of intervention by group of treatment.3 months
Therapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal researcher. Adherence to treatment will be defined as a consumption ≥ 80% of the doses that the patient should have ingested at the time of the corresponding evaluation.
SecondaryBlood concentration of BUN of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting BUN parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.
SecondaryBlood concentration of glucose of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting glucose parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.
SecondaryBlood concentration of urea of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting urea parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.
SecondaryBlood concentration of creatinin of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting creatinin parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.
SecondaryBlood concentration of Alkaline Phosphatase of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting Alkaline Phosphatase parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.
SecondaryBlood concentration of total bilirrubin of the patients included in the study by treatment group3 monthsA blood sample will be taken in each visit reporting total bilirrubin parameters. Comparisons of serum levels between groups will be made.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT06516094/registered