Trial · NCT07890792
Health Care Professionals Diet App Study
NCT07890792, Not applicable, Not yet recruiting, University of Alberta
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Health Care Professionals Diet App Study. Trials, record NCT07890792. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07890792
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Health Care Professionals Diet App Study
- NCT number
- NCT07890792
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 90 participants, estimated
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Conditions
- Nutrition Education
- Interventions
- MyDiet App
- First posted
- 2026-10-22
- Last updated
- 2026-10-26
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes15
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Nutrition Knowledge | 1 month | Change in nutrition knowledge as assessed by change in Canadian Behavior, Attitude and Nutrition Knowledge Survey (C-BANKS 2.0) survey scores from baseline to end of month 1 between intervention and control crossover group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Nutrition Knowledge | 2 months | Within group change in C-BANKS 2.0 survey scores from baseline to end of month 2 in the intervention group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Nutrition Knowledge | 1 month | Within group change in C-BANKS 2.0 survey scores from end of month 1 to end of month 2 in the control crossover group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 1 month | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) pre and post intervention in control crossover group. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 2 months | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) pre and post intervention in intervention group. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 1 month | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) between intervention and control crossover group at the end of month 1. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 2 months | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification over time in the intervention group. |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 2 months | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification over time in the control crossover group |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 1 month | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification between the intervention and control crossover group at the end of month 1 |
| Secondary | App's potential to change behavior | At the end of 2 months | Assessed using the ABACUS app behavior change scale at the end of intervention. The ABACUS scale scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate higher behavior change potential. |
1 to 10 of 15Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 15 registered outcomesOutcomes0
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
None in this release.
Results by group0
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
None in this release.
Participant flow0
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
None in this release.
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals0
The totals the trial posted for each group.
None in this release.
Papers0
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
None in this release.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07890792
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07890792/registered