Trial · NCT07890792
Registered outcomes15
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 15 of 15
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Nutrition Knowledge | 1 month | Change in nutrition knowledge as assessed by change in Canadian Behavior, Attitude and Nutrition Knowledge Survey (C-BANKS 2.0) survey scores from baseline to end of month 1 between intervention and control crossover group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Nutrition Knowledge | 2 months | Within group change in C-BANKS 2.0 survey scores from baseline to end of month 2 in the intervention group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Nutrition Knowledge | 1 month | Within group change in C-BANKS 2.0 survey scores from end of month 1 to end of month 2 in the control crossover group. The C-BANKS 2.0 Survey score ranges from 14.3 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher nutrition knowledge. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 1 month | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) pre and post intervention in control crossover group. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 2 months | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) pre and post intervention in intervention group. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Diet Quality | 1 month | Change in diet quality as assessed using Health Eating Index (HEI) between intervention and control crossover group at the end of month 1. The HEI score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better diet quality. |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 2 months | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification over time in the intervention group. |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 2 months | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification over time in the control crossover group |
| Secondary | Intake of ultra-processed foods | 1 month | Change in intake of ultra-processed foods as assessed using food records data from the app and using NOVA classification between the intervention and control crossover group at the end of month 1 |
| Secondary | App's potential to change behavior | At the end of 2 months | Assessed using the ABACUS app behavior change scale at the end of intervention. The ABACUS scale scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate higher behavior change potential. |
| Secondary | Usability of the app | Anytime in 2 months based on end of participation. | Assessed using the mAUQ questionnaire at the end of participation in the study after starting intervention. The 18-items on this questionnaire are scored on a likert scale of 1 to 7, where higher scores indicate better usability. |
| Secondary | Acceptability | Anytime in 2 months based on end of participation | Assessed using the TFA questionnaire at the end of participation in the study after starting intervention. The 8-items on this questionnaire are scored on a likert scale of 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate better acceptability. |
| Secondary | Adherence to Mediterranean diet | 2 months | Assessed using the mediterranean diet serving score (MDSS) over time in the intervention group. MDSS score ranges from 0 to 24 , where a higher score indicates better adherence to mediterranean pattern of eating. |
| Secondary | Adherence to Mediterranean diet | 2 months | Assessed using the mediterranean diet serving score (MDSS) over time in the control crossover group. MDSS score ranges from 0 to 24 , where a higher score indicates better adherence to mediterranean pattern of eating. |
| Secondary | Adherence to Mediterranean diet | 1 month | Assessed using the mediterranean diet serving score (MDSS), change in MDSS score compared between the intervention and control crossover group at the end of month 1. MDSS score ranges from 0 to 24 , where a higher score indicates better adherence to mediterranean pattern of eating. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07890792/registered