ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07899151

Decision Support for Chemoprevention

NCT07899151, Not applicable, Recruiting, Columbia University

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Decision Support for Chemoprevention. Trials, record NCT07899151. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT07899151

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
NCT number
NCT07899151
Status
Recruiting
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
240 participants, estimated
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
RealRisks Decision Aid
First posted
2026-10-27
Last updated
2026-11-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChemoprevention Uptake12 months after randomization
The primary outcome is to compare the uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) at 12 months among women at high-risk for breast cancer assigned to standard educational materials alone or combined with the web-based decision aid, RealRisks. Assessed by EHR log and self-report
SecondaryBeliefs about medicationBaseline, 6 months, 12 months
Beliefs in Medication Questionnaire (BMQ)adapted for use in chemoprevention decision-making. The BMQ includes the Necessity scale (10 items that assess how patients perceive their personal need for chemoprevention for reducing BC risk, maintaining their health, and preventing illness), the Concerns scale (10 items measuring concerns about potential adverse effects of chemoprevention). Participants rate the extent to which they agree with each item on a scale (scored 1- 5). The total score for each scale is computed by adding the scores for each scale item together and dividing by the number of items.
SecondaryPerceived Breast Cancer RiskBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months3 items of absolute estimate, comparative risk assessed on a 3-point Likert scale, and numeric 10-year risk of breast cancer on a scale of 0 to 100%
SecondaryPerceived Cardiovascular Disease RiskBaseline, 6-months and 12-months3 items of absolute estimate, comparative risk assessed on a 3-point Likert scale, and numeric 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease on a scale of 0 to 100%.
SecondaryAccuracy of Perceived Breast Cancer RiskBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Difference between perceived numeric risk estimate and actual 10-year risk of breast cancer risk according to the BCSC risk calculator; Categorized as accurate if the difference between subjective and objective risk estimates are ≤5% in either direction, underestimate if \>5% below objective risk, and overestimate if \>5% above objective risk
SecondaryAccuracy of Perceived Cardiovascular Disease RiskBaseline, 6-month, and 12-month
Difference between perceived numeric risk estimate and actual 10-year risk of Cardiovascular Disease Risk according to the 2013 ACA/AHA ASCVD risk calculator; Categorized as accurate if the difference between subjective and objective risk estimates are ≤5% in either direction, underestimate if \>5% below objective risk, and overestimate if \>5% above objective risk
SecondaryInformed ChoiceBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
This measure combines the chemoprevention knowledge scale, an attitudes scale, and chemoprevention decision. Informed choice defined as 1) those who have an adequate knowledge score, a positive attitude towards chemoprevention, and decide to take chemoprevention; 2) those who have an adequate knowledge score, a negative attitude towards chemoprevention, and decide not to take chemoprevention.
SecondaryDecision ConflictBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Score on the 10-item Decision Conflict Scale assessing uncertainty and conflict related to decisions about chemoprevention uptake. Items are rated using three response categories: Yes (0), Unsure (2), and No (4). Scores are summed, divided by 10, and multiplied by 25. Final scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater conflict and lower scores indicating less conflict.
SecondaryIntention or decision about chemoprevention uptakeBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Behavioral intentions to take chemoprevention measured using 'Given what you know right now, how likely do you think you are to take a breast cancer prevention drug in the next year?' (1 = 'not at all likely,' to 5 = 'extremely likely').
SecondaryFactors influencing intention about chemopreventionBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Survey item to rank the main factors influencing a patient's decision about chemoprevention: 1) Personalized risk information; 2) polypharmacy for CVD or other comorbidities; 3) Provider recommendation; 4) RealRisks DA; 5) Other:\_\_\_\_

Outcomes0

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

None in this release.

Results by group0

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

None in this release.

Participant flow0

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

None in this release.

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals0

The totals the trial posted for each group.

None in this release.

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01CA293927Integrating Breast Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Risk to Explore Decision-Making for Chemoprevention Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Women at High Risk for Breast CancerKUKAFKA, RITA; CREW, KATHERINE DCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2024 to 2025

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07899151

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07899151/registered