ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07899151

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChemoprevention Uptake12 months after randomization
The primary outcome is to compare the uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) at 12 months among women at high-risk for breast cancer assigned to standard educational materials alone or combined with the web-based decision aid, RealRisks. Assessed by EHR log and self-report
SecondaryBeliefs about medicationBaseline, 6 months, 12 months
Beliefs in Medication Questionnaire (BMQ)adapted for use in chemoprevention decision-making. The BMQ includes the Necessity scale (10 items that assess how patients perceive their personal need for chemoprevention for reducing BC risk, maintaining their health, and preventing illness), the Concerns scale (10 items measuring concerns about potential adverse effects of chemoprevention). Participants rate the extent to which they agree with each item on a scale (scored 1- 5). The total score for each scale is computed by adding the scores for each scale item together and dividing by the number of items.
SecondaryPerceived Breast Cancer RiskBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months3 items of absolute estimate, comparative risk assessed on a 3-point Likert scale, and numeric 10-year risk of breast cancer on a scale of 0 to 100%
SecondaryPerceived Cardiovascular Disease RiskBaseline, 6-months and 12-months3 items of absolute estimate, comparative risk assessed on a 3-point Likert scale, and numeric 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease on a scale of 0 to 100%.
SecondaryAccuracy of Perceived Breast Cancer RiskBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Difference between perceived numeric risk estimate and actual 10-year risk of breast cancer risk according to the BCSC risk calculator; Categorized as accurate if the difference between subjective and objective risk estimates are ≤5% in either direction, underestimate if \>5% below objective risk, and overestimate if \>5% above objective risk
SecondaryAccuracy of Perceived Cardiovascular Disease RiskBaseline, 6-month, and 12-month
Difference between perceived numeric risk estimate and actual 10-year risk of Cardiovascular Disease Risk according to the 2013 ACA/AHA ASCVD risk calculator; Categorized as accurate if the difference between subjective and objective risk estimates are ≤5% in either direction, underestimate if \>5% below objective risk, and overestimate if \>5% above objective risk
SecondaryInformed ChoiceBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
This measure combines the chemoprevention knowledge scale, an attitudes scale, and chemoprevention decision. Informed choice defined as 1) those who have an adequate knowledge score, a positive attitude towards chemoprevention, and decide to take chemoprevention; 2) those who have an adequate knowledge score, a negative attitude towards chemoprevention, and decide not to take chemoprevention.
SecondaryDecision ConflictBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Score on the 10-item Decision Conflict Scale assessing uncertainty and conflict related to decisions about chemoprevention uptake. Items are rated using three response categories: Yes (0), Unsure (2), and No (4). Scores are summed, divided by 10, and multiplied by 25. Final scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater conflict and lower scores indicating less conflict.
SecondaryIntention or decision about chemoprevention uptakeBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Behavioral intentions to take chemoprevention measured using 'Given what you know right now, how likely do you think you are to take a breast cancer prevention drug in the next year?' (1 = 'not at all likely,' to 5 = 'extremely likely').
SecondaryFactors influencing intention about chemopreventionBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Survey item to rank the main factors influencing a patient's decision about chemoprevention: 1) Personalized risk information; 2) polypharmacy for CVD or other comorbidities; 3) Provider recommendation; 4) RealRisks DA; 5) Other:\_\_\_\_
OtherPerceived usefulness of RealRisks6 months and 12 months
Preparation for Decision Making scale. 10-items assesses a patients perception of how useful a DA or decision support intervention is in preparing the respondent to communicate with their provider at a consultation making a health decision.
OtherAcceptability of RealRisks6 months and 12 monthsOttawa 10-item Acceptability questionnaire includes questions evaluating comprehensibility, sufficiency of information, and overall suitability of the DA for decision making.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07899151/registered