ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT07911176

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryFinal Peer Assessment Rating (PAR)Baseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).
The primary analysis will compare the three randomized treatment strategies with respect to the final PAR score at 18 years of age, adjusted for baseline PAR score, according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan. PAR scores will be assessed on digital study models.
SecondarySpontaneous alignment of crowded teethBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Dental alignment assessed on digital study models using tooth size arch length discrepency (TSALD, mm) and Little's Irregularity Index (LII, mm)
SecondarySpontaneus extraction space closureBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Space closure closure assessed on digital study models using extent of space closure (mm).
SecondarySagittal skeletal relationship assessed by ANB AngleBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Sagittal skeletal relationship asessed using ANB angle (degrees) on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
SecondarySagittal skeletal relationship assessed by Wits appraisalBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Sagittal skeletal relationship asessed using Wits appraisal (mm) on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
SecondaryChange in jaw inclination (ML/NSL Angle)Baseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Vertical skeletal relationship asessed using jaw the ML/NSL angle (degrees) on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
SecondaryFacial height changesBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Vertical skeletal relationship asessed using facial height (mm) measurements on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
SecondaryNasolabial angle changesBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Soft-tissue relationships assessed using nasolabial angle (degrees) anon lateral cephalometric radiographs and profile photographs.
SecondaryLip positions relative to Rickett's estethic lineBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Soft-tissue relationships assessed as the distance from the upper and lower lips to Ricketts' estethic line (mm) on lateral cephalometric radiographs and profile photographs.
SecondaryTooth inclination changes on cephalometric radiographsBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Tooth inclination assessed on lateral cephalometric radiographs using anagular measurments (degrees).
SecondaryTooth movements on cephalometric radiographsBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Tooth movements assessed on lateral cephalometric radiographs using linear measurments (mm).
SecondaryChange in objective treatment need assessed using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN).Baseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).
Orthodontic treatment need assessed using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). The scale ranges from Grade 1 (no treatment need) to Grade 5 (very great treatment need) with higher scores indicating greater orthodontic treatment need.
SecondaryChange in objective treatment need assessed using the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON).Baseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).
Orthodontic treatment need assessed using the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). The scale ranges from \< 29 (easy) to \> 77 (very difficult), with higher scores indicating greater orthodontic treatment need and treatment complexity.
SecondaryChange in objective treatment need assessed using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAIBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).
Orthodontic treatment need assessed using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI). The scale ranges from ≤ 25 (no or slight treatment need) to ≥ 36 (treatment mandatory), with higher scores indicating greater orthodontic treatment need and treatment complexity.
SecondaryOral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)Baseline, Post-extraction (9-12 years of age), 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).
Oral health-related quality of life assessed using the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14) Short Form. The scale ranges from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact on oral health-related quality of life.
SecondarySelf perceived orofacial aestheticsBaseline, Post-extraction (9-12 years of age), 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Orofacial aesthetics assessed using the Orofacial Estethic Scale (OES). The scale ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with orofacial appearence.
SecondaryHealth economic impactFrom baseline to the end of active orthodontic treatment (approximately 16 years of age).Health economic impact assessed based on treatment duration, chair time, number of visits, healthcare resource utilization, and patient and family costs.
OtherChange in white spot lesions14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Changes in number of white spot lesions (early caries lesions) assessed on clinical photographs.
OtherChange in DeFS (Decayed, enamel included and Filled Tooth Surfaces)14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Initial and manifest caries lesions assessed on bitewing radiographs using the DeFS index. Higher scores indicate greater caries experience.
OtherChange in root lengthBaseline, 14 years of age, 16 years of age, and 18 years of age (through study completion).Extent of root resorptions assessed as change in root length (mm)on panoramic radiographs and periapical radiographs using linear measurements (mm).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT07911176/registered