ConductScience.org, home

85,013 comparisons from ClinicalTrials.gov.

85,013 comparisons

Most participants first33,758 with no events in either group come last3,201 to 3,220 of 85,013

Show the results as
ComparisonWith the outcomeRisk difference, 95% intervalParticipantsTrial
Golytely vs Miralax-Gatorade Prep: serious adverse events6 of 1,139

5 of 1,100

0.1 points

-0.6 to 0.7

2,239NCT03298945

Comparative Effectiveness of Split-Dose Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Regimens

Fosaprepitant vs Aprepitant: No Vomiting Overall (in the 120 Hours Following Initiation of Cisplatin)806 of 1,106

844 of 1,132

-1.7 points

-5.3 to 2.0

2,238NCT00619359

Evaluation of Fosaprepitant (MK0517) in Single Dose Schedule (0517-017)

Receiving Highlighted Prompts vs Receiving Non-highlighted Prompts: The Number of Prompts That Were Responded to672 of 1,076

712 of 1,161

1.1 points

-2.9 to 5.1

2,237NCT01583101

Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation (CHICA) Highlighting Study

Dapsone Gel vs Dapsone Gel Vehicle: serious adverse events4 of 1,117

4 of 1,118

0.0 points

-0.6 to 0.6

2,235NCT01974323

Safety and Efficacy Study of Dapsone Gel in Patients With Acne Vulgaris

Seqirus QIV vs Comparator QIV: serious adverse events11 of 1,673

3 of 559

0.1 points

-0.9 to 0.7

2,232NCT02914275

A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Seqirus Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in a Pediatric Population 6 Months Through 59 Months of Age.

Whey Permeate RUSF vs Soy Protein RUSF: Recovery From Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM)960 of 1,144

874 of 1,086

3.4 points

0.3 to 6.6

2,230NCT01790048

Whey Permeate Study

Bempedoic Acid vs Placebo: deaths from any cause13 of 1,487

2 of 742

0.6 points

-0.2 to 1.3

2,229NCT02666664

Evaluation of Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of ETC-1002 in High-Risk Patients With Hyperlipidemia and High CV Risk (CLEAR Harmony)

Bempedoic Acid vs Placebo: serious adverse events216 of 1,487

104 of 742

0.5 points

-2.7 to 3.5

2,229NCT02666664

Evaluation of Long-Term Safety and Tolerability of ETC-1002 in High-Risk Patients With Hyperlipidemia and High CV Risk (CLEAR Harmony)

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With an 5-minute Apgar Score Less Than 44 of 1,117

4 of 1,110

-0.0 points

-0.6 to 0.6

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Tachysystole325 of 1,117

313 of 1,110

0.9 points

-2.9 to 4.6

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Presence of Chorioamnionitis203 of 1,117

155 of 1,110

4.2 points

1.2 to 7.3

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants Used Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor949 of 1,117

935 of 1,110

0.7 points

-2.3 to 3.7

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Uterine Hyperstimulation Syndrome184 of 1,117

147 of 1,110

3.2 points

0.3 to 6.2

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid227 of 1,117

234 of 1,110

-0.8 points

-4.1 to 2.6

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Unplanned Hysterectomy1 of 1,117

0 of 1,110

0.1 points

-0.3 to 0.5

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Neonatal Sepsis2 of 1,117

1 of 1,110

0.1 points

-0.3 to 0.6

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With NICU Admission Order16 of 1,117

17 of 1,110

-0.1 points

-1.2 to 1.0

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Uterine Rupture0 of 1,117

1 of 1,110

-0.1 points

-0.5 to 0.3

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants With Postpartum Fever11 of 1,117

3 of 1,110

0.7 points

0.0 to 1.5

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Foley Bulb Plus Oral Misoprostol vs Oral Misoprostol: Number of Participants Administered Neonatal Antibiotics and/or Neonatal Blood Cultures277 of 1,117

237 of 1,110

3.4 points

-0.1 to 6.9

2,227NCT03407625

Foley Bulb With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Request

GET /api/comparisons/v1

Words from a trial's title, conditions or interventions, its outcome or its groups, or an NCT number.

An outcome counted in participants, the serious adverse events, or the deaths from any cause.

No key needed

Code

Show the call in
curl "https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?page=161"

Response

The first 2 of this page's 20 results. GET /api/comparisons/v1?page=161

{
  "data": {
    "total": 85013,
    "results": [
      {
        "id": "NCT03298945-sae",
        "title": "Golytely vs Miralax-Gatorade Prep: serious adverse events",
        "summary": "6 of 1139 against 5 of 1100; risk difference 0.1 points, 95% interval -0.6 to 0.7; NCT03298945, Comparative Effectiveness of Split-Dose Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Regimens",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT03298945-sae",
        "nct_id": "NCT03298945",
        "kind": "serious-adverse-events",
        "participants": 2239,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": 0.0007223242078378163,
          "lower": -0.005966679090135514,
          "upper": 0.00742537134907077
        },
        "group_1": "6 of 1,139",
        "group_2": "5 of 1,100",
        "difference": "0.1 points",
        "interval": "-0.6 to 0.7",
        "trial_title": "Comparative Effectiveness of Split-Dose Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation Regimens"
      },
      {
        "id": "NCT00619359-0c850ea6",
        "title": "Fosaprepitant vs Aprepitant: No Vomiting Overall (in the 120 Hours Following Initiation of Cisplatin)",
        "summary": "806 of 1106 against 844 of 1132; risk difference -1.7 points, 95% interval -5.3 to 2.0; NCT00619359, Evaluation of Fosaprepitant (MK0517) in Single Dose Schedule (0517-017)",
        "record": "/library/comparisons/NCT00619359-0c850ea6",
        "nct_id": "NCT00619359",
        "kind": "outcome",
        "participants": 2238,
        "risk_difference": {
          "value": -0.016830778471427887,
          "lower": -0.05326852087211246,
          "upper": 0.019624987413915995
        },
        "group_1": "806 of 1,106",
        "group_2": "844 of 1,132",
        "difference": "-1.7 points",
        "interval": "-5.3 to 2.0",
        "trial_title": "Evaluation of Fosaprepitant (MK0517) in Single Dose Schedule (0517-017)"
      }
    ],
    "no_events": 33758,
    "columns": [
      {
        "key": "title",
        "label": "Comparison"
      },
      {
        "key": "group_1",
        "label": "With the outcome",
        "under": "group_2"
      },
      {
        "key": "difference",
        "label": "Risk difference, 95% interval",
        "under": "interval"
      },
      {
        "key": "participants",
        "label": "Participants"
      },
      {
        "key": "nct_id",
        "label": "Trial",
        "under": "trial_title"
      }
    ],
    "order": "Most participants first",
    "kinds": {
      "all": 85013,
      "outcome": 33568,
      "serious-adverse-events": 31897,
      "deaths": 19548
    }
  },
  "release": "trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0",
  "terms": [
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT",
      "license": "ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "Freely available. Acknowledgement requested"
    },
    {
      "source": "ClinicalTrials.gov",
      "license": "none stated",
      "notice": "ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.",
      "short": "No license stated"
    }
  ],
  "next": "/api/comparisons/v1?page=162",
  "request_id": "sML_ebHvFenhNlF9"
}

Ask about these results. The first 10 go in the prompt.

About this data
Holds
85,013 comparisons
From ClinicalTrials.gov. Counted 10 Nov 2026.
Release
23 Mar 2026
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Checked
20 of 20 review comparisons traced to ClinicalTrials.gov, and all 510,078 numbers calculated again apart from the builder agree
Access
Open
No account. 60 calls a minute from one address.

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

Genes

NCBI Gene

One gene with its proteins, patents, drugs, trials, grants and papers.

Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov

Search clinical trials by condition, drug, outcome or NCT number, with the results each one posted.

Sequences

Patent publications

Paste a sequence and see the patents that disclose it.

Opens sequences.conductscience.org

For software

Read Trial comparisons from software.

Every answer on this page is also JSON, under /api/comparisons/v1. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1?q=placebo%20heart%20failure&kind=outcome

Ask an assistant

  • In FOURIER, how did serious adverse events compare between evolocumab and placebo?
  • Which metformin trials reported deaths, and what was the risk difference?
  • What was the number needed to treat for HELIOS-B's composite outcome?
  • Which placebo-controlled heart failure trials had the most participants?